Alverez
[quote who="player1_fanatic" reply="6" id="3670598"] Quoting Alverez, reply 1 Randomized maps have always felt like a way of artificially inflating games to me. It makes sense in a 4x where the 'story' is different every game, but in an RPG it's just annoying. SC is not just
I would really like a basis for the design intent of each ship. It will be a big help for us providing feedback on their function. Hyperspace needs to stay the same. Red hue and all. Make it a little prettier sure but the overall idea needs to be the same. It's a huge part of the star control feel. I'm giving Starbases a chance but feel that having safe ports all over will subtract from the "us against the universe" feel. Space fe
Randomized maps have always felt like a way of artificially inflating games to me. It makes sense in a 4x where the 'story' is different every game, but in an RPG it's just annoying.
I support giving Shade some new subject matter for his drawings. Please.
Don't hurt yourself with all that edge.
It won't. It's not a good game. There aren't any redeeming features about it. The story was poor, the game play was boring, the game was buggy, the combat felt flat, and the puppets.
I'm aware of NWO and it's a terrible game. The multiverse thing is an explanation for why they are making a Star Control game without any Star Control races, ships, or lore. No more no less. It's also being played as a reason for user created content, but that sort of thing is really Stardock's modus operandi. They just have an excuse this time.
Sounds like the kind of thing that would make me quit the game and not come back. If I wanted to join a user created universe I'll do it with mods.
Just going to point out that the video we got was a teaser..just because the lander sequence took 12 seconds there doesn't mean that is how long it will be in game.
As an EVE player..what's broken about the view? Also going to point out that the camera drone can be moved.
Fun is acceptable again, GWAR is good.
I read the monthly update zoomed all the way out. It looked pretty top down, but I just took another look zoomed in to normal levels. From the screens there it look like it's 87 degrees. Feel is a big part of it, you have that experience, I dont. I'll get it eventually
1) Willing to give it a shot, but I like the idea of top-down better. 2) I like a clear view of things. Off to the side or to the top. 3) I wrote something rather long about this the other day.
[quote who="Rhonin_the_wizard" reply="36" id="3669440"] My thoughts. Planet exploration My only request is that resources not be represented as floating glowing cubes or spheres. [/quote] Thank you..so much of this. I've expressed my hatred of the current candy resources before.
Good update. Lots of info in there.
That's usually how words work.
Ran it through Google Translate for you. He said: 'Fyleoosa wykti o tlkuta h, itoyn d.aida eftep l aeat suyw s <p class="goog-textarea short_text" style="overflow-y: hidden; overflow-x: auto; box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 32px; he
[quote who="The_Think_Tank" reply="58" id="3669115"] Am I the only one who is unable to see the new Gameplay Trailer? Or am I just missing the obvious about where it is? [/quote] [video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6ntg47q_cM[/video]
It means a day later than was initially planned. What day it was planned for is up for debate.
March is the new February, haven't you heard?
Name submissions ended sometime in October if I remember correctly.
Until we start talking to you. Then you'll regret it.
Guess I never posted here. Here goes: Intel Core i5 i5-4690K MSI Z97 Gaming 7 Kingston HyperX 16GB DDR3 MSI GeForce GTX 970 (4GB) Crucial MX100 256GB SSD WD Blue 1TB HDD WD Blue 320GB HDD SeaSonic SSR-650RM Think that covers it. Edit - Windows 10 btw
[quote who="Lone_Utwig" reply="62" id="3668378"] Hmmm. Frogboy, is there a specific reason why you are not adding me to the channel? [/quote] Busy guy. Took a couple of days to approve me. He'll get to you.