Hey that looks really cool... I tried to download, however the file is missing from the path of the link provided under Subscriber resources.
citats
Are you using Dashboard? If yes you have two options there. the built in mini Launcher plus the laucher plug in. There are others as well Dashboard http://www.snoopsoft.com/ Program Launcher (free today plug in) http://www.pocketpccity.com/software/pocketpc/Launcher-2000-12-15-ce-pocketpc.html
http://www.omegaone.com/PocketPC/BPInstructions.html#4 this should assist you
definitely look into what Doreen is describing. I had that happen to me and it took me quite awhile to figure out where the heck to turn that off. This is an item that should never be set to default "ON", however it is.
Are you running any other apps that might be trying to take control of the Nav bar. Like wisbar or icbar etc.
My experience shows that in this case the Properties on your processor are actually embeded on the chip. I might be of the belief that you are running an "Athlon XP 2000+" this is the chips name. The stepping and mode are more reflective of the actual bus speed. I recommend you give SiSoft's Sandra a try. You can find a Demo on this http://www.sisoftware.co.uk/ run the cpu/bios info for greater detail.
I am a Mi'kmaq of the Algonquin nations... My name is Sulian, I might add I am amused not offended by the website. What is the world coming too if we can not laugh at our selves?
The government can do no good by adding more regulations. what would it be? force manufacturers to write drivers for every alternative OS... this is a happ hazzard solution that could add financial strain on some companies, force them to release blue prints... now they get phone calls from users complaining about how bad the driver is... I really believe that the open source software is doing fine the way it is... just so long as they can put down SCO... and on another note MS is indeed a mono
What program is being used to chose which OS to boot to? as well as all the Q's hashonboat is asking. the easiest way would be with Partition magic. Especially if your not really good with computers. Don't read any more if your not at least an intermediate computer user. however it is possible to fix all your problems with a win98 start up disk ... (this is assuming the OS you wish to keep is a windows OS) b4 you do this make a back up of all critical files... do
oh btw kona when you see my si sandra specs you do see a dvd rom however I can only use it for data disks. 233 is not fast enough to decode and play a dvd movie. very jumpy misses lots of frames... i was experimenting. If I get the k6 I will put the dvd back in.
I disagree... 2k runs just as fast as 98se and boots faster. My notebook specs are the same as kona's. the 266 k6 2 does not have any L1 cache. Unless code is writen for 3d now it would run considerably slower then a p2 233. I found out the my notebook is using a socket 7. I can upgrade my p2 to a k6-2 380 mhz... unfortunately my system can not handle a plus k6 chip so still not L1 cache but at an increase of 147 mhz it will perform much better.
Neither. They are completely separate programs from dashboard however they tend to compliment it quite nicely. They skin the top and bottom bars as well they add functionality like task management. Dashboard only skins the today page. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle"
When you first install Dashboard it asks you if you would like dashboard to replace the today screen as the main screen. If you select no then you can run dashboard ontop of the today screen but I believe that it then acts like any other today plug in. I suggest you reinstall and chose yes to that q: On the other hand if your refering to the start bar not being skinned and the command bar on the bottom. Dashboard does not skin those bars, you need another program to do this. your op
Kona something sounds seriously not right about that boot. Even if your exagerating by a minute, thats just not right. below is a copy paste from Si Sandra note the I am using a triple boot with win98/winxp and RH Linux yes on a p233 notebook with 96mb of ram My boot is 70 sec. using XP SiSoftware Sandra Processor Model : Intel(R) Pentium(R) MMX Speed : 234MHz Performance Rating : PR234 (estimated) Type : Standard Mainboard Bus(es) : ISA P
I agree with Koasati... only I would take it one step further... I think a user should have to log in to download anything. Being a member of wincustomize, presented with an clear understanding of the MB limits for non subscribers and an overall understanding of the bandwidth issues in general. this alone prevents deep linking to downloads. I do not believe the argument that such a mandatory log in would prevent users from frequenting Wincusto, but your unique # of visitors will drop
the mobo would have to be designed with a temp monitor. I think that based on the age of the notebook that is highly unlikely.
http://docs.us.dell.com/docs/systems/pmojav/specs.htm your specs sir...
sorry kona unless you have an i after the cp your ram is maxed... but like I said xp will run fine on it.
Memory info based on the latitude cp Memory module sockets 2 Memory module capacities and type* 16-, 32-, 64-, and 128-MB, 3.3-V EDO SODIMMs (128-MB SODIMMs for the CPi system only, with CPi BIOS A03 or higher) Standard RAM one 32-MB memory module (CP) or one 64-MB memory module (CPi) Maximum RAM 128 MB (CP) 256 MB (CPi) Memory access time: tRAC 60 ns tCAC 15 ns <A HREF="https://www.wincustomize.com/index.asp?Cmd=fu
dell is easy... on the bottom of your notebook is a support tag# just type it in here https://support.dell.com/register.aspx if your using this machine when you goto the site you can do a scan of the current setup.
check the manufactures website. You may find that your notebook supports EDO and Sdram.
oh and expect that 233 to take about an hour and a half to install XP. Your question about upgrading... there is a really strong chance that your ram is max'd on your notebook. the only upgrad
I have run XP on my Umax 233 with 96 mb ram. It ran pretty good actually I only decided to remove it and go with win2k because of the size of XP on my dinky 3 gig HD. 2k runs quite smartly too I must say. the trick to getting good performace with smaller ram is memory management. brick wall your swap file at 2x your ram. This will prevent excessive disk usage that you would other wise get from windows resizing the virtual memory every bloody 5 minutes. <img src="http://images.stardock.c
I have been really pro Mandrake for those just starting out... but I am changing my colors! I have found that Red Hat has done an incredible job of creating a Desktop replacement for windows... The RPM installer is awesome. The redhat network does quick and painless updates. I have setup RealVNC server and connect to it from my windows machines. Its a really easy distro. Try it. I did, and I love it so far. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/joke.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmid
... I would know pretty fast that it was XP no matter what. most likely the reason is that your company is too cheap to pay for an XP license. The classic theme that comes with XP is the closest you can get, use small icons on the start menu to remove the banner, the only obvious give away will be the windows logo on the start button... don't forget to disable the auto hide notification area and the pop u