Give Brad a break everyone. He's a busy guy, and he'll fix it when he's able to.
Big Doug
One of THE most useful programs ever made.
Symantec products haven't been good since Norton 2002. My $.02 is that Microsoft is doing a good job with their new stuff (Windows Defender, OneCare is very good) while on the other end of the spectrum, IE7 is a worthy browser and has come a LONG way since IE6. I'm not a "fanboy", but I call a spade a spade and their new stuff IS decent. No operating system is EVER going to be 100% secure. Ever. As long as the developers keep work
Yes, AeroShell works. It uses Samurize. The author (who is a good friend of mine) tried it first using DesktopX and had problems with transparency or something. Don't remember exactly what the problem was beyond that.
we've had hints here and there....I think I know what it is....but I'm not telling.
I have your solution for your desktop icons. Go to Aston Setup, the Desktop option, and click on "Get Explorer Icons". Voila! You have your icons back. Of course, Aston offers .png support for icons, so just make my own anyway <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/grim.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmidd
Cheers to DA. Too bad their servers are always so stressed out from all the traffic.
I first tried Aston and Talisman about three or four years ago. Aston struck me as being more stable, while Talisman seemed to be good at crashing out. Since then both programs have added features. The difference is that Aston is STABLE. Rock-solid stable. Aston has an easy learning curve, and has the benefit of having MANY plugins, which likewise are stable. Talisman, while it DOES do more (theoretically Aston can be made to do everything that Talisman does eye-candy wise), Talisman ju
AveDesk is one of the coolest programs I've ever had the pleasure of using. And it owes it's existance to DesktopX and ObjectDock, with both programs being the inspiration for it. AveDesk is tops in my book and has the benefit of a LOT of people supporting it's development. Like IconX on steroids (which, of course, IS cool), but does what OD and DX does too. AndreasV should work for Stardock, making a program of this calibur. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/events.g
Brad, keep your chin up. Someone said earlier that for every hate email you get, there's at least two people who appreciate the site and everything you folks do. I'd like to pipe up modify that figure somewhat more like 15:1 who appreciate. Take your vacation bud. Go to Hawaii or to some paradise (Lab.06 at Microsoft would be a good start heheh.....). I realize you can't just *ignore* the haters but then again maybe you should since they *didn't* get a subscription and probabl
...and now Frog thinks to himself "dear god, MORE bandwidth being used..."
I'd like to see DesktopX become a shell replacement. Only thing stopping it from being a full-fledged one NOW is the taskbar and systray hooks don't work when explorer isn't running. I'm sure that both of those issues could be fixed easily, if Stardock decided it was worth doing.
Not a very wise thing to say to someone who gave APPLE the idea for Aqua in the FIRST place. After all, Stardock was making ALL of this stuff in the early and mid 90's on OS/2. Well, most of it. So stop trolling and go back to your Mac forums. You've no business here with the crap you keep spouting.
The widgets look horrid, IMO. Tiger itself looks...well...not great. Not even GOOD for that matter. Same old same old if you ask me.
thanks hipster.
I'd like to see .png support added to OB. Also, The ability to set font, font size and font type (bold, italic, etc) right in the program. And, the ability to set the sizing and spacing margins would be good as well. Thanks for your attention.
Really, what's to say DX and WB could NEVER work on OSX? Personally, if it's true then I say GOOD. Sure, development would be long but lemme see....Brad got HIS Mac last year, so seems to me that it's probable that he wanted to get WB and DX going on it.
Four years in development for THAT ? Whatever. Longhorn will be out by the time they finally get done with this.
Good stuff Brad. Thanks a lot. I and a LOT of people use Samurize. You've always been respectable in my view now you've reaffirmed why. I assume then that we're finally getting a Samurize section ? If that's the case, then I'm sure a LOT of new people will be start using it and thus, a lot of really REALLY good tutorials will be written finally. Thanks again Brad, and Stardock. <img src=
http://www.aqua-soft.org/board/index.php?showtopic=12910&st=15 Scroll down to the post by crni.
If this is true - THANK YOU Stardock!! Let's give ALL the support to these fine people that we can. Not that Sysmetrix is BAD or anything, just...well, Samurize does it's own thing.
I haven't been able to get it working at all.
I'm not saying that DX or anything is BAD --- just that it's too hard for most people to figure out right off the bat like most other PC Software. I can't make a WindowBlinds skin to save my own life (to give an example) because SkinStudio is too cumbersome for me to make much of anything work properly. We need a set of clear-cut standards. Not necessarily dumb things down, but do more with less. And easier.
I've been in the IT Profession a LOT of years --- since the early 80's when I was a schoolkid making programs to help my teacher sort out her grade books. First on the Vic-20 and C64, then on to the Amigas and IBM's. And I have NEVER seen a time when the IT industry was THIS boring. There's NOTHING new anymore. Everything we have going on now is derived from everything ELSE that we did back then. And I'm sick to fucking death of it. Windows XP. The "brilliant hallmark of Window