JillUser JillUser

When "Mom" is Away the Kids Burn Down the JU House

▼

When "Mom" is Away the Kids Burn Down the JU House

from JoeUser Forums

Wow, I go on vacation and come home to see all sorts of "stuff" going on here.  It looks as though Mikimouse is gone.  People are commenting left and right that things are getting nasty here.  Sir Peter declares war against the morons.  Wow!

So what is the cause of all of the nastiness?  My husband says I am a calming force in his life.  Maybe I can do the same here.  I just don't even know where to start.

I do see a lot of complaints regarding personal blogs vs blog "journalism".  I think this is an old subject and simply don't understand why anyone cares what is being written about in other people's blogs unless they are named personally.  I do think that people should keep "personal" blogs off the forums.  Likewise goes for any blog that you really don't want people to comment on.  Don't waste our time if you don't want our input.  You are just being a tease if you post to the forum and don't allow comments.

I personally enjoy JU and don't plan to ever leave.  I might not be on here as often as before due to my busy Summer and hopes for getting some sun.  I do enjoy popping in for an occasional quick visit whenever I get a free moment.  I hope people can be real and be civil to one another.  The rest will sort itself out.

blogging
12,793 views 82 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top

Oh and forgot to add that this means all the rightwinger fanatical Christian types who want to save me from my sluttishness and Buddhism and eventual burning in hell aren't reaching me anyway....AHHH SATISFACTION:)


hehe..'when the student is ready, the teacher will appear'....I needed to hear that this morning!  Thanks!

Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top
If you are Joking LW - you have to lest us know...

I have a reputation as a crack pot joker... denote the within my post...

I dont deny that you may have been joking... based on your recent encounters with the above mentioned bloggers, I have reason to doubt.

BAM!!!
Galactic Civilizations IV
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
hehe..'when the student is ready, the teacher will appear'....I needed to hear that this morning! Thanks!

You are very welcome:) (don't know exactly what I said but I'm glad it was helpful)

Cin
Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top

Mug, I'm not deleting or locking this.  I think it is a fine lesson in trying to judging others with the same guidelines that you wish to be judged with.  My experience with LW has lead me to believe that she has a sharp, cutting, and, since I can only read and imagine the way things might be said, possibly dry humor.  I am a huge fan of fine wit.  I think it hugely hypocritical for Sir Pete or even you Mug, to dub LW "nasty".


I think the accusations as far as LW and MP are concerned are unmerited.  LW has never been nasty to MP and stated in the title of the aforementioned blog that it was sarcasm.  I am a frequent user of sarcasm myself.  Some people often mistake sarcasm for nastiness.  Those people need to exercise their humor muscles.

Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
Drink some hot cocoa on my behalf and don't break any limbs skiing or snow boarding---It had to be said. I am the Mom after all


You forgot to mention that he should wear his coat...

And whatever happened to can't we all just get along?
Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top

(don't know exactly what I said but I'm glad it was helpful


You made that comment about right wing fanatical Chrsitians who want to save you from youe own sluttishness, Buddhism and from the fires of hell.....I had a convo yesterday with someone along those lines and I just really needed to hear my thoughts come from someone elses mouth.
So, thanks!

Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
little_whip - I am so flattered by your constant comments everywhere about me! I have only recently begun to see just how wonderful Sir Peter is, so I am again flattered that you think him and I would be good together. Thank you so much!
Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top
Actually, I think that you will find that in order to be a spinster one has to have never been married, and I think that the people you are referring to are in fact married.


You expect him to have a grasp of proper use of the English language? What a dreamer!!
Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
my Husband. The difference being that: a) He is a real person.b) His intellectual capacity dwarfs that of peteys.c) Im sure He has a larger penis, too.


This is just utter nonsense, again I will tell you to stop implying that I do not exist because you do not have any evidence to the contrary. I take this to be slander and now I am not joking with you: if I wanted to ruin your family I could, so do not toy with me.

When i am insulted by petey, its a joke.


No it isn't, you are a bloody vile person and quite frankly the world would be better off if lying scum like you were dead.

You expect him to have a grasp of proper use of the English language? What a dreamer!!


This suggestion is palpably absurd coming from an American. I have an extremely competent grasp of the ENGLISH language and do not need an AMERICAN to tell me otherwise.
Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top
If you think everything I do is for the purpose of role playing then you have obviously not fully understood Sir Peter Maxwell.

Not to worry you silly girl, not everyone can grasp the complexity and different levels of my articles.
Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top
So you are under the impression you can telephone Scotland Yard or Interpol and ask for the private files held on a citizen are you?

Silly girl
Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top
Where?

I said the world would be better if you people like you were dead not that I planned to kill you, you are getting paranoid you silly girl.

But I am impressed that in the 15 minutes since I posted that comment you have telephoned both Scotland Yard and Interpol and managed to persuade them to reveal information on a private individual totally going against all rules governing police procedure, bloody tremendous effort.

I can just imagine the call

Scotland Yard - Hello Scotland Yard here

Little Whip - A nasty man said bad things about me on the Internet

Scotland Yard - Really Madam

Little Whip - Yes he said I was a bitter housewife

Scotland Yard - We must investigate immediately
Reply #38 from JoeUser Forums Top
[moderator hat on] things like "No it isn't, you are a bloody vile person and quite frankly the world would be better off if lying scum like you were dead." will NOT be tolerated.  Attack the message not the messenger! That is a warning! [moderator hat off]
Reply #39 from JoeUser Forums Top
On another note- this thread is getting way off topic.  It's starting to look like middle school around here.  How about people agree to disagree and drop it?  Or, keep it to one central bash fest, OK?
Reply #40 from JoeUser Forums Top

"No it isn't, you are a bloody vile person and quite frankly the world would be better off if lying scum like you were dead."


Oh, that's just going too far.......

Reply #41 from JoeUser Forums Top
Actually, I will come clean. A while ago, after Sir Peter's numerous blogs about inflicting pain upon others (his wife, some peasants), I forwared a copy of his blog to the Gloucestershire Police. Honestly, I don't find "jokes" about domestic violence acceptable ever. In addition, I'm not sure why it wasn't considered a violation of the JU TOS.

k) promote or provide instructional information about illegal activities, promote physical harm or injury against any group or individual, or promote any act of cruelty to animals. This may include, but is not limited to, providing instructions on how to assemble bombs, grenades and other weapons, and creating "Crush" sites;

Clearly, Sir Peter was promoting physical harm or injury against individuals.

If he is real, like he says he is, he was commiting a crime. But since he is not real, no crime was committed. The Hi Tech Crime Unit for the Gloucestershire Police investigated.

Spare me the comments about having too much time on my hands. I worked for a DV shelter and one of my clients was murdered. Sir Peter struck a nerve, and I did something about it.

Hopefully this puts an end to the debate.
Reply #42 from JoeUser Forums Top
As I said to you at the time there is NO high tech crime unit in Gloucestershire. There is a National High Tech Crime Unit but no such thing exists in Glocestershire so I am not sure who you reported me to. Perhaps they created one to specifically deal with my blog entries, since they are proven to increase domestic violence in British households by nearly 85pc.

Please spare me the drama, my blogs do not promote domestic violence, and I will challenge anyone who says that they do. Do you really think that Sir Peter Maxwell could be prosecuted? You really could not make this nonsense up.

If he is real, like he says he is, he was commiting a crime.


A man is allowed to discipline his wife and servants how he sees fit and I doubt that even Tony's government would dare to become involved with the politics of the Maxwell dynasty. But, thank goodness you alerted the boys in blue here in Gloucestershire to my evil blog. Hopefully justice will be done and the evil peasant beater Sir Peter Maxwell will receive the punishment he deserves for being such a very very big bad nasty man.

Perhaps you should start a petition demanding my immediate removal from this site, after all I so threaten free speech that you are compelled to remove my right of free speech for the good of bruised housewives and repressed peasants everywhere! My removal is what you want is it not? Then let us see where everyone's loyalties lie.
Reply #43 from JoeUser Forums Top
Its been sitting there for over 5 hours. Thats FIVE hours without a comment, while his "good friend" pete is on this thread making death threats because i joked about his penis size.


Gene and I converse privately since it is impossible to have a rational discussion ANYWHERE on this site.
Reply #44 from JoeUser Forums Top
This is just utter nonsense, again I will tell you to stop implying that I do not exist because you do not have any evidence to the contrary.


No one has ever denied your existence...someone nonexistent couldn't be posting to the site, after all....we just dispute the existence of anyone named Sir Peter Maxwell, living in the location where you claim to live.....
Reply #45 from JoeUser Forums Top
Looking back over this thread, i think the irrational one is obvious. HInt: it aint me.


I will give you an example of you irrationality. Because Gene had written an article which was clearly a sign of distress, you expected numerous comments from Sir Peter Maxwell. When they didn't come you came to the conclusion that I was a bad friend to Gene. It never struck you that I would have other ways of interacting with Gene other than JoeUser comments. Now, what was that? "It aint me", bloody idiot.
Reply #46 from JoeUser Forums Top
we just dispute the existence of anyone named Sir Peter Maxwell, living in the location where you claim to live.....


Until you can provide conclusive proof I think my friends, family and my public can be forgiven for referring to me as Sir Peter Maxwell the English billionaire from Gloucestershire.
Reply #47 from JoeUser Forums Top

Now, what was that? "It aint me", bloody idiot.

[moderator hat on]  This is my last warning.  Quit the stupid little squabbles or I will be forced to take action.  Please people, quit acting like middle school children. [moderator hat off]

Reply #48 from JoeUser Forums Top
The argument is over, it has degenerated into petty insults which will go on for ever so I will walk away from this discussion for the good of everyone involved. I know karmagirl is a fair person and is obviously warning everybody involved in this little squabble and not just me as that would be a terrible thing to do.

I bid you all good day and wish you well.
Reply #49 from JoeUser Forums Top
To get back to Jill: I love the title! I guess Draginol is wrong about reliance on mommyism; it seems it is very much in need inasmuchas individual responsibility is on self destruct--with mommy away--particularly the Maxwellian brats.
Reply #50 from JoeUser Forums Top
Ugh, talk about proving "mom's" point... pretty damn shameless, imho.