[quote who="Prof_Hari_Seldon" reply="70" id="3739460"] Kermamorjens, Stardock has said they started the suit because P&F infringed on Stardock's "Star Control" trademark by claiming Ghosts of the Precursors is the true sequel to Star Control. At the same time as Star Control Origins reached a publicity milestone with the release of the SCO beta at the 25th anniv
[quote who="Kermamorjens" reply="66" id="3739436"] Quoting Bufohominum, reply 52 So what I don't understand is why when you only have the rights to the name Star Control, you all but remade SC2? If this hadn't become so acrimonious I imagine they wouldn't have decided to exercise (what they believe to be) their rights.&nbs
[quote who="Sir_On_The_Edge" reply="57" id="3739361"] They had already said this, it's the same point as their previous post. How does it further anything? [/quote] It's the same subject, but they elaborated on it to defend their position. Seems like a genuine attempt at discussion to me.
[quote who="Sir_On_The_Edge" reply="54" id="3739348"] Someone is ignoring our replies to post more of their own rhetoric. Please take part in a conversation rather than spam the same points, and yes, it is spam if you have nothing new to say. [/quote] Uhhh, they directly addressed jafo's point about the copyright on the box. Your post sounds like you consider anything other than agreement to be ignoring people.
[quote who="ozdon81" reply="53" id="3739298"]... [/quote] You're wasting your time. This forum is mostly full of people who are Stardock fans first and foremost. They have already decided that Stardock can do no wrong. Personally, I was looking forward to Origins and whatever P&F would come up with, but Stardock's actions have poisoned the waters so I have yet to (and may never) buy Origins. It's a pity, I was pretty neutral when the dispute started, not be