There is really no excuse for ill-informed comments like yours. The server in question was not a mail server and not connected to the internet in any way. The mobile computer is also never connected to the internet. The ultimate protection for dedicated use machines is no exposure at all. You can't infect what you can’t touch. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/joke.gif" border=0 AL
Wow! Talk about piling on... I was not going to post again since I didn’t expect everyone to agree with my comment in the first place, but since I've basically accused of stealing movies I'm forced to defend myself. 1) I have never downloaded a movie nor do I hide behind a screen name. 2) One of the caps mentioned in the article was 5G/month, that's certainly too low. However,
Windows 2K server: 9.5 months 24/7, shutdown to replaced failed CPU Fan, ran another 6 months before backup application required reboot, still running now after 3 more months 24/7 with ~ 25 users. Windows 2K workstation: installed in telematic prototype application (OBDII monitor, GPS navigation & mp3 player) with 65K miles on system, hibernating between driving sessions, regularly runs for 2 to 3
This is really an issue of infrastructre build out and headroom. As a DSL user with no caps, I find it hard to believe that the cable modem users are willing to live with these caps. It will not be long until the cap amount falls, or more likely, the average user will see that the use of new streaming multi-media will quickly put them over the cap. Its just another way they will dig into subscribers pockets. I was considering switching to cable modem, but not anymore!
WinCustomize Forums