Thanks all. As I get older, I guess I get impatient more easily instead of taking the time to sleuth and figure things out for myself.
Adrenochrome
Geesh, you can't be serious. Do I have to watch these multiple windows trying to sell me games everytime I launch Impulse? Please somebody tell me what's going on. Maybe I've done something wrong. Otherwise this is a blatant piece of adware such as I would never have expected Stardock to try to foist on its loyal following. Please explain. Thank you for your help.
I don't have too big a problem with the idea of MyColors themes costing something--that is, as long as I can keep skinning my windows with WB and with new WB themes. I'm not one of those people who needs his skins seamlessly prepackaged with software in order to install and run themes. Why should I have to download the software every time I want a new theme? If I'm missing something here, please enlighten me. OD as it stands now is just fine with me. I think I'll stick with fr
Curious--Will most MyColors themes cost money to get?
Sorry, I can't see any difference between the two weather widget shots. What am I overlooking? As for the rest, thanks for the intelligent tips; I'll try to put them into action ASAP.
I've rebooted, reinstalled WB, uninstalled the WB beta, installed the stable version, reinstalled the video and monitor drivers, and repeated bits and pieces of this in various sequences. To no avail. I've been running WB for years (ODNET) and never had this problem. Mostly problem free, although I did have installation problems with early WB 5 betas. For example, since reinstalling WB 5 this time, my skins don't show up in the skins list--
Just tell me one thing: what kind of an example does the Vice President of our country provide to our young people when he himself doesn't get off his gluteus long enough to pay $7 for a hunting license? Can you say Cheap Bastard? We have cheaps shots, Tricky Dicky, trigger-happy Dick and, oh yeah, jail inmate charged with involvuntary manslaughter if that lawyer dies as a result of Mr. Cheney's manly sportsmanship. Sorry, I got all mad and
Neil, Not sure if you're referring to the exception message I mentioned or to the non-appearance of my installed skins in the WB 5 config. I'll address the latter. I've got 1,000's of apps installed, but my GUI apps besides WB are Sysmetrix, Rainlendar, CursorXP; Additionally, the following are always running: xplorer2 filemgr, Slickedit 10, X1, 4NT cmd window, BVRP FaxTools, OpenOffice 1.5 or 2.0, Process Explorer, Antivir Classic w/ AVGuard, WordWeb 5, Mozilla 1.7.12, Di
Thanks, but clicking the Rebuild button doesn't help. I've tried it about 6 times. The window refreshes but the only two skins that show are Windows XP and Classic.
I'm using WB 5.0.1. Most things seem to be working fine, although clicking on the Appearance tab in Display applet causes an exception, which I can document if needed. My big problem is that my installed skins don't show up in WB 5 previews, even skins I've newly installed since this latest version of WB 5. They DO get installed, however, and can be loaded as the current skin by double clicking on the .WBA file and clicking on the 'load this skin' popup. Any suggestions? The skins are still in t
With XP, I finally got used to (and came to like) the somewhat cryptic two-letter OS names that began with "NT". Now Microsoft takes a new tack and adopts a name that sounds like the Vista Cruiser on That 70's Show. That's right, it sounds like an old car ... and many other things like VISTA, Volunteers in Service to America at http://www.friendsofvista.org/ If we're lucky, maybe VISTA will sue MS for illegal use of its name! I do thin
Sad but true. I thought it was kind of funny recently when I discovered a thread on a Usenet OS/2 news group, in which one last diehard cursed eCS as a bastard OS with phony support and vehemently defended IBM as the only company that could be relied on to continue to truly support OS/2 into the future. Remember those days when we thought almost anything IBM did was good, because we loved OS/2? Personally, I always thought it stupid t
Dang...sounds like me....except I'd be 'brown-nosing'... You're right! I thought something wasn't right about "brownosing", but couldn't see it.
Brad, I'd like to address the general issue of your postings and the kinds of responses you've described here in the AveDesk exchange. I don't want to sound patronizing ( or crazy , but when we look back on history 5, 10 or more years from now, I think you'll be seen as an innovative businessman who was highly involved in the development and user communities, and who spent time far beyond th
As long as I can get equivalent functionality with a lower memory footprint from tools like Rainmeter, Rainlendar, Sysmetrix, KlipFolio and the like for the widgets I want running on my desktop (system resources, clock, calendar, weather and maybe an RSS feed), I won't run DesktopX. This is despite the fact that I've been an Object Desktop subscriber for two years and a Stardock supporter since the late '90's.) For similar reasons, I don't like IconX
This was helpful to me, who knew little details about Aston. I'd like to see a comparison of system performance under the two shells. Knowing memory consumption is helpful, but how about questions like Which shell has less of a hit on performance of other programs? Which has fewer video problems on a given system? and so on.
Build REXX as an alternative scripting language into DesktopX. -) Not kidding.
Your political compass Economic Left/Right: -2.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.23 I'm down with Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama. 's alright by me.
Pixel 8. Novel yet spare, eyeappealing yet practical, animated but not distracting, tastefully and thoughtfully done. The scrollbars are the best pistons I've seen in any skin and perhaps the only ones I've liked. Go for it.
You've captured my feelings exactly. The magazines left the real world around the same time and in much the same way as Lou Gerstner abandoned OS/2. They've bowed down before the soulless god of the "enterprise." Then again, they make alot of money. Dare I say, even Spencer the Katt isn't very funny anymore.