I do hope the new version is XHTML + CSS Otherwise you're passing up a huge opportunity to save TONS of wasted bandwidth.
Aaron W.
Perhaps he's very low on space?
Yeah, the intro page doesn't load for me... Just sits there. I have flash plugin etc. No loading going on... This is why sites should not rely entirely on flash
Naw, it's prolly natural. I can't help but be paranoid about it...
Alright, so I can be found hugging my knees in a corner if there is word of a spider in the house, but this SARS thing is scaring me... A friend of mine along with his family have been quarenteened, and another friend of mine was hanging out with the potentially-infected friend... Should I be worried sick like I am, or just relax? I hear it kills about 5% of those infected, but does it kill random people, or just the young, old and/or weak? The fear keeps me awake...
Well I think the time has come that they will have to learn a new language out of necessity. PHP is actually very easy to learn. Its syntax rules are very simple. The only think one needs to know is what functions are available to them. Functions can be found at the PHP site (php.net) so it's easy to find what you need. Then there's JSP (Java Servlets), but I'm not sure how much faster/slow that would be than PHP or ASP. My guess would be faster, but it's definately not as easy
Yes, PHP is definitely a wise way to go about things. Also, with Apache + PHP + MySQL you can get special cache modules which work like so: A page is generated dynamically. Yay! Now that page has been stored in the cache of the server so if it is called again with the same parameters and hasn't been changed, the cache is dished out and no parsing is required. Basically it just lightens the load on the server's processing end, but bandwidth usages stays the same. Then y
IPlural kinda odd hehe
Or perhaps the whole "friendly fire" thing is a cover up. Why would we want Iraq soldiers to know they are succeeding anywhere? If we lose a troop, we blame it on ourselves so not to give Iraq the "credit". They watch our news too, so we have to be careful.
It's not a dictatorship. It's simply a matter of enforcing politeness and proper etiquette. What he said was simply "Those who cannot design skins yet, just stop trying to learn." If that doesn't strike you as wrong, then both your attitudes need adjusting... I've been voicing my opinion in this thread for 5 pages now, and despite the mods' disagreeing with me, I still haven't be threatened with a ban. Why? Because I do it politely and I back up my opinion as best I can.
I'm not suggesting they stop. I just thought it would make sense to wait until they've developed more as skinners before submitting their works. That only goes for those incomplete skins though. One of the ones I pointed out (the trippy rainbow one) was well skinned, but I just didn't like the colours. Nothing wrong with posting those because lots of people love those skins.
100th post. I just had to be the one to do that. My first thread and it's gone to #100... Though ~20 or so seem to be odd little messages with no apparent meaning :o Meh. 100 is 100. Post on.
Alllllright, has this thread been declared dead? Now all the flies are buzzing around making small talk (You guys going on about the gelly are the flies, but I'm not "attacking" you, just using a metaphore.)
What?
Perhaps I will try making some more elaborate skins for my site, too... But I'd still like to try one for XP.
Well firstly, I am capable of taking criticism be it good or bad. In fact, I'm quite used to taking more of the negative and it's hardened me so to speak. I'm not a very "emotional" person and am not easily hurt by negative comments. I can usually understand the intent. I guess, because of that, I should learn to think of others not as myself :S I can take negative criticism but it's apparent that not everyone can and that's fine with me. Meanwhile, I think I'd like to try my h
My showing of examples was simply because I'd been asked. I was affraid of being flamed for it, which in retrospect I should've KNOWN I'd get flamed for it. "Those who can, do. Those who can't, criticize" Not at all the case. I don't have the software to make skins, and if I did I'd likely only make a few as I'm sure the process is quite tedious. I do respect the work put into the skins, I just don't agree with the authors' choice to submit them when they aren't complete or the
MrGupps - is the wallpaper in my profile bad?????? I wouldn't say it is. I haven't seen any bad wallpapers on this site though (except for that XP wall I did a year or so ago... I swear it was the one that convinced the WC people they need to enforce some stricter guidelines )
I have never made a WB skin, but I can distinguish between something that has been carefully pieced together and something that hasn't. I consider myself a perfectionist to a flaw, almost Skins don't have to be perfect to be awesome. I just think that when the XP start menu is illegible, then the artist didn't put much effort into it... I consider myself a creative person, too. I just don't have the
Well in the comments I've read, they've simply been praise and no critique. There's nothing wrong it, but I think contructive critisism inspires them to improve. I put hours of work into the wallpapers which were rejected, too. I just don't see how they consider fair, though I'm sure they have their reasons.
I've been browsing the WindowBlinds skins for a while now, and have noticed that a good amount of them are very poorly done. The previews reveal graphical and alignment errors galore, and yet somehow they were still added to the collection. What struck me as odd were the comments on these skins. They were all positive about them as a parent is to her 2 year old child about his/her drawing of a house and a tree (which I can understand; he or she is 2 years old). I have seen skins which a
WTF is with the popup window at every page load? Just spams my tray browsing the site >
Hehe, I can't help find it a LITTLE amusing when they complain about server usage and whatnot when they run IIS... http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=wincustomize.com It'd save them a lot of resources to switch over to PHP on Apache.
Doh, I wish we could edit our posts... Can YOU spot the mistake in my last post?
Heck no. People who use this site aren't too likely to have garbage computers, as proven by another poll I believe... You'll notice that if you ask if they have CD drives, it'll be 100% yes and 0% no When that's the case for dvd drives, then we can start delivering software on CDs Of course, it'd be fine to offe