M4 isn't even an AR. These polls always make me wonder if the voters actually have ever fired a shot (paint guns don't count) or just like to talk about wiki articles and fps games. I mean real combat training (hopefully not real combat), not shooting range. AK47 in urban combat? That junk weighs almost 5kg. For me it's G3A3. I don't have first hand experience with M16 or AK47 (and I'm glad I don't), so can't vote on those. FAL is a close second.
Ai_Shizuka
Way to go to make it grow, eh?
My 2 eurocents after the first MP experience with Entrenchment. A bit better than vanilla, as there actually are a few games in prime time. But it's all 4v4, 5v5, huge maps. This is one of the main problems, I think. First, big battles are totally un-microable for me. I know my PC is quite old, but a rts should NOT be more intensive than a 64 players map of battlefield 2 with medium to high graphic settings. Don't know about the average playerbase, but I don't think everyone has an ub
Thanks everyone. I'll get Entrenchment tonight and play SP a bit more to get an idea about the new stuff. No problem about some sound beatings for a while. Hell, I EXPECT to get owned pretty badly for a while. Last game I played online extensively is Battlefield 2, and the first couple weeks was pretty rough there. A bit disappointed about the numbers. 130 people online are, well, pathetic. I mean, Sins really strikes me as a multiplayer game. No campaign, dumb
Hi all, new player/first post here. Sorry about grammar/spelling atrocities, English isn't my first language. First off, I'm quite surprised by this community. Usually rts forums are full of srs bsns kids flaming each other. Here, beside a few exceptions, there's a lot of mature and friendly people. I like it. Anyway, it's about a week of single player beating hard AIs no problem, so I tried my first mp game today. About 30 minutes to finally join a game, 4 players FFA. I see