ok.... that kinda clears it up... Seeing as the public preview of Vista was Beta2, and I reckon yall have been workin on building SV since well before Beta2 came out...
WDMaze
I am getting the same issue. I have a dual-boot config with XP and Vista, and when I boot to Vista and run StyleVistaUI.exe, it comes up with the DWM error. The only thing I can think of is that I don't have the amount of ran that will allow for the 'Aero Glass' effect, and that is what StyleVista skins and changes.......... Of course, I don't really know, but..... makes sense, huh?
If you get ONE email from anyone feeling they have been 'damaged', then I would have to suggest many long hours of therapy for the person so 'damaged'. People are in business to make money. It is the way things are. It is at the discretion of the person who is MAKING the money whether or not they wish to continue making money on a particular product. If someone happened to buy a thing, and then it
The WB skin name is 'Progressive', and was made by essorant (tim dagger). Web page is http://essorant.ipfox.com . Look for 'progressive' in the left side selection menu, and below that (in the :: details :: section) click 'WindowBlinds'. Hope this helps. Take care, and have a great day. /me thinks
If it was basic WinXP with a different color, Mr Benn is right. It's an option in Display Properties/Appearance. That was what I was using before taking the plunge into WindowBlinds and all that other great skinning stuff. Just choose Windows XP style under the Windows and Buttons: section, and choose Silver under Sub Design: . <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddl
/me thinks: Looks like a 'Sliders' type skin... have to look this up..
/me thinks it would be nice if it were feasible to ask for payment for goods or services rendered...
/me plays the devil's advocate for a second... "But, you have to pay for the SkinBrowser! Why should I pay for that when I can hit your website and download oodles of stuff for free, then come in and nag about the download limit and server busy messages???" ok... so maybe I shouldn't play devil's advocate any more... it didn't work out quite the way I expected it to..... <img src="http: