Senkill

Reply to Why no multiplayer? in Galactic Civilizations II GalCiv2 Forums

I would like to thank the people associated with the project for their feedback, and everyone else as well. It is true that I conducted no polls when I said that I believe there are enough people to make multiplayer worth it. It was simply my presonal belief, which of course is now in question. There is a distinction to be noted, that are we talking about buying the game because of multiplayer or buying the game whether it has multiplayer or not. I do think that there are very few people who

Reply to Why no multiplayer? in Galactic Civilizations II Stardock Forums

Thanks for your responses guys and gals. I understand the arguements for multiplayer and against multiplayer. It is my belief that there are enough people out there who would use the multiplayer feature to make it worth it. If you look at MOO 2 it is still possible to buy the game, but why is that? The game is a piece of cake on level set to impossible, so it's replayability is limited. The game only lasts because of the multiplayer option (also the fact that it's hard to find a decent TBS

Why no multiplayer? in Galactic Civilizations II GalCiv2 Forums

Me and two other friends have been waiting years after botf and moo II for another great turn-based space strategy game. The reason we love these games is because we like to network our computers and hang out and play. This is the key reason any of us buy these kinds of games. We love these games, because we like to hang out and compete. This and Galciv look AWESOME you cannot believe how excited I was when I heard about these games! Until I heard there was no muiltiplayer. What a disaster