BetaguyGZT

BetaguyGZT

Joined Member # 1912678
0 Posts 0 Replies 73 Reputation

1.) The network quarantine feature is a badly-needed one. Kudos for Microsoft finally doing something in that regard. 2.) Hot-patching is a good thing as well. Many times, you can't *just* bring a server down for a restart. Some servers can take up to 30 minutes to fully boot up. 3.) Image-based setups: long overdue. Takes 39 minutes down to about 15 or 20 (under optimum conditions...). Another good idea.

2 Replies 7,490 Views

Yes, it was intended as a shell replacement. And my goal is (and has always been) COMPLETE replacement, down to the window management itself. If DX can't do it (or has been purposely made NOT to, as I suspect) then it's not the framework for the job. And I keep hearing a LOT about stuff not being meant as shell replacements, but that's never stopped me yet <img src="http://images3.stardock.com/wc/smiles/Tongue.gif" border=0 ALIGN="abs

15 Replies 9,148 Views

@thomassen: That's EXACTLY what I ran into. I attempted to fill a bug report, but had no idea where to do that at. Maybe at the newsgroup place(s) thru Stardock Central? *shrug* @Woodbridge: yes, that DOES interest me. Next question, will changes take hold when DX3 is running as shell?

15 Replies 9,148 Views

Hello everyone. Long time lurker, first time poster lol... Yes, I tried to do it with Desktop X. The first few releases of it's prototypes were my SlickWin project. Basically I was trying some new things, some worked and some didn't. Some of the things I tried were a little beyond DX's abilities, like using .png for the taskbar and systray components. I'd end up with transparent text and bad stretching/tiling of the images underneath.

15 Replies 9,148 Views