JillUser JillUser

Homemaking is a "Real" Job

Homemaking is a "Real" Job

We need to change society's view

We as a society, meaning the majority of us, seem to view homemaking as something that anyone could do therefore it isn't a real job. If you are a homemaker and your spouse/partner isn't doing "their part" you must be subservient. And there seems to be no consideration of how well you do your job or how many tasks are included in your job. Sure, anyone could do almost any given part, but few could do all that a homemaker does.

Then there are those that seem conflicted in their view. They state how hard homemaking is but still don't treat it like a "real" job. I will give an example: (Keep in mind, I think these people mean well, they just aren't thinking it through.) Someone suggests to the homemaker "You deserve to have a vacation. Let your spouse take over for a couple of days". Does the homemaker ever take over the spouse's job so they can have a vacation? Don't think so. Now you might argue, the spouse gets vacation days through work. My rebuttal to that is, the spouse's job doesn't get taken over during that vacation. All that work is waiting to be caught up when he/she returns.

People often say they know what a demanding job homemaking is. Some even go as far to say that they couldn't do it. That they have a job outside the home as an escape. When you are a homemaker you never have a punch out time. You do however have a lot more control over how you use your time to accomplish your tasks. You might be able to stay in your PJs until noon but then you also have to be the one to doctor your family all night when they are sick and have the responsibility that everyone is getting to their appointments, eating well, are clothed, etc. Saturday and Sunday are just like any other work day (except you usually get to sleep a little later).

There are advantages and disadvantages to every job. I personally am very proud of my job as a homemaker. My husband and I decided that would be a priority for our family at least for as long as we have children at home. We have a wonderful home and a healthy, stable family. We don't have that just because my husband makes a lot of money. We are partners in life. He can do what he does because I do what I do and vice versa. I am an equal partner. My husband doesn't cook or do laundry and I don't run the business. I actually prefer him not doing stuff around the house because I am a bit of a control freak :) He helps out when I can't due to illness. That is all I would ever ask.

So the next time you ask someone "So what do you do?" and they say "I stay at home." Don't just say "Oh, that's nice." Try saying "So how are things going?" or "How are you liking it?" since that is usually how the conversation goes with those who have "real" jobs.
6,367 views 46 replies
Reply #26 Top
Then you have people like somebody that I am related to who has one child, works part time because she says she goes crazy staying home, is pregnant and talks about having a third. Now *that* is not being true to yourself. (working with two or three small children? especially when you can live on your husbands income?) Be true to yourself and make your life work the way you want it.

How is that not being true to herself? Perhaps she wants to have a large family, but yet she also gets satisfaction from spending some time away from the family...it doesn't have to be either one or the other, in my experience. My grandmother had nine children, loved them all dearly, and still worked full time at as an aide at the state mental hospital for pretty much their entire childhoods and beyond.
Reply #27 Top
I think I am more cut out for working vs. staying at home at times, only because, after years of deadlines at both work and school, it's a different view of the clock, for me. Time does seem to drag on. However, I've grown to appreciate these differences. I like being able to spend time to teach my daughter things, instead of hoping that daycare/school will cover it in more detail. (For instance, my daughter toilet-trained so easily... I'd love to take the credit, but her daycare did most of the hard job.) I think the hardest part of a stay at home parent, is maintaining a sense of individuality. Being called Mamma all the time is nice and deserving, but I am my own person, and it's easy to lose sight of that.

Now that I am working from home, I have the best of both worlds. I get to be both a stay-at-homer and a working Mom on alternating days when Kole is in kindergarden; these different opportunities have certainly been an eye-opener.
Reply #28 Top
JillUser, I mostly agree with you, but I've got to disagree on the vacation comment. When someone takes a vacation at work, the most critical tasks are usually delegated to someone else who can either handle them or has contact information for the vacationing person. The same thing should apply to home-makers. When the home-maker needs a break, the other family members should take care of the most critical business. Home-making is indeed just like any other job, and that means that the homemaker needs a break once in a while, otherwise we're not talking about a job, we're talking about indentured servitude at best.

My wife chose to be a full time home-maker until recently (when I left my cushy job to start my own company), and I've had a crash course in how difficult a job home-making is. I'm nowhere near as good at it as she is, and I don't do it full-time, but I only thought I appreciated it before...now I REALLY appreciate her efforts. I think everyone should have the opportunity at least once.

hats off to stay at home parents! :)
Reply #30 Top
My mom was also a "stay-at-home" mom, and it is much better for the kids. Then my parents got divorced (Dad had an affair and was subsequently thrown out), and since my mom had no real work experience for 15 years, and no education, she had to go to work as a supermarket cashier for minimum wage.....she worked her butt off "for peanuts" as she used to say. It was a constant struggle for us to stay afloat financially, even with child support payments. So yeah, it iS better for the kids to have mom stay home, but there is no guarantee that you will stay married. It taught me a valuable lesson and I got my college education in medical laboratory technology, so that after I had 3 children and unfortunately ended up divorced myself, I was able to provide very well for myself and my children. With the divorce rates so high in this country today, no matter how stable/happy your marriage is, ya' gotta have plan B.
Reply #31 Top
debidoll, I totally agree that women should establish themselves before having a family. My parents raised me to get a degree and be prepared to take care of myself first then have a family. I did that. I have a degree in applied math/computer science. I worked up until having children. I still work part time for the business we own so I am fortunate enough to not be totally cut off from the work world. Another example is a cousin of my husband's who taught school until she had her second child. She now has 5 children! She is a stay at home Mom, and BTW her husband isn't wealthy monetarily, and she still does some evening teaching jobs occasionally as well as coaching soccer and participating in a coed soccer league with her husband.

I think that planning for divorce is not necessarily the right outlook. I am old school on marriage though. I know that divorce happens to wonderful people who would never have imagined it though. You should have a plan B for loss of spouse due to any reason. If your spouse dies or is incapacitated, you need to have some idea of how your family will get by.

You don't have to be wealthy to have a parent stay at home. You have to be willing to budget carefully and go without some of the amenities that you would otherwise have. Our cousin who has 5 kids is one of the most outstanding parents and people I have ever met. She stays up on the outside world and keeps a very tidy, stable, comfortable home. I couldn't handle it the way she does.

BTW, just because someone has a lot of kids doesn't mean they are good parents but if they do well with 5 kids, that means they are incredible parents!
Reply #32 Top
Thanks GCJ, I am feeling better but still taking antibiotics for that stupid sinus infection. At least I can blame my airheadedness on the sinuses :)
Reply #33 Top
One more comment, to those of you moms that don't stay at home, just like any other job, it isn't for everyone. I know plenty of women who have tried it and were miserable. It wasn't because they were bored. I know a lot of people just picture women sitting at home watching soaps, eating, and vacuumming. It is one of those jobs that can include very little or an enormous amount. It all depends on what you want out of it.

I don't think that it is best for the child if the parent is at home and miserable. They need to have satisfaction in what they are doing in order for it to work. Everyone has different circumstances that determine how they deal with their lives. I am just suggesting that people accept homemaking as one of those valid career choices. After all, daycare workers haver real jobs. Maids, cooks, drycleaners, chaufers, personal assitants, travel agents, party planners, etc have "real jobs". Homemakers do all of those things.
Reply #34 Top
I am just suggesting that people accept homemaking as one of those valid career choices. After all, daycare workers haver real jobs. Maids, cooks, drycleaners, chaufers, personal assitants, travel agents, party planners, etc have "real jobs". Homemakers do all of those things.


WooHoo!! Absolutely and I thank you for making this post! It validates my proposal in somany ways!!!
Reply #35 Top
But how often can/does your wife go out with friends, and how often do the two of you go out together, without the children?


I don't think I've ever refused to watch the kids when my wife has wanted to go out with friends. My wife and I also try to go out once per week alone on a "date".
Reply #36 Top
I am just suggesting that people accept homemaking as one of those valid career choices. After all, daycare workers haver real jobs. Maids, cooks, drycleaners, chaufers, personal assitants, travel agents, party planners, etc have "real jobs". Homemakers do all of those things.

It's fair of you to feel this way and ask for acceptance, but IMO - you really shouldn't be looking for validation in the choices you've made, especially if you and your family are happy.

Thinking about it - my personal opinion is that homemaking is not a job, if only for the fact that calling something a "job" DEVALUES it. Staying at home to raise the children and take care of running the house should be worthy in it's own right. This was my original point - you don't get paid for it (unlike daycare workers) - and that IS A GOOD THING - it makes your intentions more "pure" in a way.

It might be more accurate to think of it as a "noble calling" - like ministry, or volunteer work, or some of the other undervalued "real jobs" we have such as teachers, ecologists, and.. well poet-philosophers. =D

Once you call homemaking a job, you get put in the same bucket as Donald Trump and Kenneth Lay. Dig?

So... get over the "real job" thing, and I think you will be secure in your choice when you see your children grown up and exceeding all your hopes and expectations of what you thought they could become.

Also

Enjoy the ride.
Reply #37 Top

Lol... 'dig'... hippy...

"It's fair of you to feel this way and ask for acceptance, but IMO - you really shouldn't be looking for validation in the choices you've made, especially if you and your family are happy."

It isn't validation. Children do the validating. If no one here needed to vent about their beliefs being misunderstood or mischaracterized, would there be any posts?  Few, anyway. 

People explain it this way because of pigheaded people who don't consider it 'labor'. In order to make said idiots understand you have to equate it to a 'job'. This isn't a matter of degrading what is being described, it is translating it into Neanderthal for those who differ.

Reply #38 Top
Poet, I am glad that you expanded you view but you missed my point. You are being far too literal. I am not looking for validation. I am very secure in what I do. That doesn't mean I appreciate the constant condescendance I recieve. I missed the progression from homemaking being a job and being in the same "bucket " as corporate sleaze.

Ministers, volunteer workers, teachers etc still get treated like they actually work. Homemakers in general aren't looked at in that same view.

BakerStreet, thanks for the clarification. I am just trying to point out that a lot of people have a instant reaction to homemaking as really doing nothing. You either work or stay at home. That is the attitude I am fighting against. I am very happy with and proud of what I do but can still see unmerited attitudes come from friends and others. Sure you can try to say you shouldn't care what others think. Nice in sentiment but in reality most of us guage ourselves in some respect to how others see us.
Reply #39 Top
It's fair of you to feel this way and ask for acceptance, but IMO - you really shouldn't be looking for validation in the choices you've made, especially if you and your family are happy.

Looking for validation? I don't think any of us who stay at home are looking for validation...the only validation I will ever need comes from seeing my children grow into responsible, caring, loving adults.
Reply #40 Top
Homemaking is a real job--but it is only open to those who are married to a man or woman rich enough to support them.


If rich is making $35k per year or more than we agree.
Reply #41 Top
I know many people, including my family, who have had lived happily as such making quite a bit less than 35k a year. The choices usually come down to '15k+ for a new car, or 2k for a used one." We pay almost 500 a month in health insurance alone, and it is difficult, but I find the hardships worthwhile for the time being.

Others have more demands, and I don't fault them. I don't think this thread was every about demeaning folks that don't live this way, rather how people who do opt to are often demeaned.
Reply #43 Top
I'm a youngin, so maybe that's why I don't see the world as the same when it comes to the 'stigma' around the homemaker area.
I just don't see a stigma, period. Maybe it's left-over sentiments from the Corporation 80's generation that was rebelling against the 50's? To hell if I know. :)

In all actuallity, when I do settle down it would be with someone who agreed someone has to be the "homemaker"... I think society as a whole needs MORE of them, regardless if it is the father/mother/husband/wife.. Maybe alot of problems we discuss here on joeuser could get a swift dent in the keister if there was a more family unit thing going on.

Hopefully more in my generation group agree that staying at home and doing those nessecary vital things is important, not something to look down on and scoff about..
Reply #44 Top
Lunaticus, well said. I guarantee you would see the stigma right away if you were a homemaker. It is very wise to discuss those sorts of things before settling down.
Reply #45 Top
I'm a homebody myself and value beyond belief a clean well-managed household. It's a machine that needs constant maintanence, including regular oilings of that green funny paper called money. I pity da fools who laugh at homemakers. ^_^
Reply #46 Top
Thanks Mr T I know for a fact that it makes a big difference for the kids to know that I will be there for them and that my husband gets to come home to a warm meal and cozy home. None of them are stressed out. We all talk and spend a lot of time together. We don't have to spend the weekends catching up on laundry and house work. None of our family's income goes to childcare or housekeepers. I can feed my family what they should be eating instead of just what I can get together in whatever little time I have. We take care of ourselves and have energy to then be there for others also. I guage my family's success in how happy we all are not in how much money we have. On that note, I know that homemaking does not give all people happiness. Just as I am not cut out for the cut throat business world, a lot of people aren't cut out for the stay-at-home world. Everyone has a different path. All paths are important though.