science question
contradiction
JoeUser Forums
Okay light is constant currently 300000 kilometers per second. Anything that is matter is slower. It doesn't matter what kind of light it is but it runs at the same speed and matter is slower. All the universe came from one particle. The bigger the particle the slower it goes through space. We are seeing the original light. The light that would have outrun us a long time ago. Even if light used to go faster even smaller pieces of matter would have run slower. There is no way we could be seeing the original light. It doesn't matter if its all the light or infared all light runs at the same speed and we are slower because we have mass. There is no way to see the light of the big bang. It is more probable that we are seeing more recent light.
Another problem is that they have multiple big bang particles. Is there a theory that could explain this. First what is the proof that leads to the zero dimension centerI don't know. When the idea of the atom came about it was the smallest mass. Are there smaller particles. Yes. There is a observation of particles mysteriously appearing. I got a theory it forms from particles that are so small that we don't know they exist. I understand this is 1/200 quintillionth of a centimeter. If mass is intimately smaller I think it is impossible to wormhole this way. I'm talking about the big kind. Current science can't prove or disprove non quantum wormholes. Maybe gravity is produced by spinning. According to physics if you keep compacting it explodes big bang particle or exploding black holes you decide.
Y Lets talk about science if you do something a hundred times and it comes up one way 99 times and another way once you go with the 99 right except when it comes to dating. Before I finish radioactive dating has proven to be 200 times more recent if it was reliable. Radioactive dating is reliable until you add or take away water. Anybody believed in a world wide flood or that they can prove it never rained there. Anything grew there. No one pissed or pooped there. Spit on the ground. Every other dating method. AAnotherthing let's say there used to be less of some elements. Even there were all the elements there were fewer of some. Let's say some element's turn into other's. Let's assume that one element came from energy and all other elements formed from one element. Two different things should bring about the Evidence. One thing is the universe was created expanding with all the elements with some elements changing into others. the other conclusion says everything came from energy. Recap creation would leave the same evidence as evolution.
Millerurrey experiment was really good self replicating molecule from a protein was really good 23 of 26 proteins. This stuffrocks. They tried to go further they can't. Matter of fact they gave up and went on to other stuff.The userr interface was invented because the screen was to small on cell phones. Why do I want this on a big computer screen. Why do I want mini programs I mean apps on a big terabyte hardrive. These are reasons smart phones and computers need different operating systems.virtual keyboards are irritating. Scrolling forces to select when you don't want to when you are reading a page and it goes to the wrong page because it doesn't know the difference between scrolling and selecting. Compared to a computer where you use a mouse wheel to scroll and a button to select. Smart phones are inferior to computers but Microsoft will go to a teenager or young adult to find out what to do because there are more of them. That is why Microsoft does not seem to know what thevusets want and we get inferior technology.
