Questions for August 2009

We love you.

Edit: What is with the forums today?
This time I even reloaded this page to make sure that I didn't double-post, and only reposted after checking. Bam. Double-post. Bah!

1)  How will Elemental keep the end-game fast and playable, and prevent tedium?

Late-game Master of Magic (and to some extent, Civilization and MOO2) tend to get bogged down in building reports, such that choosing the next building for many, many cities took 95% of my time.  Gal Civ II got bogged down with fort-building, and Age of Wonders got bogged down with gigantic battles involving dozens of units that started really far away from each other.  I never actually finished a game of Master of Magic or Civilization because of all the late-game city-management.

2)  How will the combat formulas work - and will the formulas themselves be easily moddable?  Such as "Damage = (Strength * Weapon Power) / (Total Armor)", etc.

This may seem really nit-picky or overly technical, but I find that games live or die by such basic details.  Diablo and Diablo II, for example, were horribly flawed in that armor only served to give a chance of avoiding damage, making instakills very common in the late game.  Titan Quest's armor system gave at most a 50% damage mitigation, which (as with World of Warcraft) made the actual armor rating the least important statistic on a piece of armor.  Gal Civ II's offense/defence formula - sorry to say, I loathed it, and it's one of the things that made me stop playing.  Age of Wonders had a REALLY bad system (once again based on armor evading rather than mitigating damage) that resulted in semi-invicible heroes avoiding 30 hits in a row, only to be instakilled by the next one.  If only I had had the ability to mod the combat formulas, I would have gotten a lot more enjoyment out of all of them...

Darkodinplus' Top 7 Questions

1. Will Channelers be able to duel?
2. Can players create their own spells?
3. Can multiple forces participate in a single battle?
4. Can battles span more than one turn?
   
5. How detailed will Channeler customization be?
6. Can extremely powerful items be created by the player?
   
7. What kind of special abilities or traits can Channelers gain?

Will there be different planes of existence or is it at least something we can mod? And by this I mean will we be able to warp between one map to another?

1. If I send you cookies, will I get in the alpha?

Ok, all joking aside, here are my real questions. I outlined these in another post, but I imagine you don't have the time to browse the forums too closely

• What sort of things can you put essence into? Is it limited to other units (champions, priests, etc) and making land livable, or can we do other things with it? To use the Lord of the Rings example, can we imbue our fortress to create a Barad-dur-like indesructable tower, or create something like the One Ring? (I know, not everyone likes LotR/Tolkien, but it's the easiest way to get this idea across without a very long-winded explaination )

More details on magic! Do you plan on rigid magic trees? Something ala AoW:SM (which I think is similar to MoM)? We know you intend for much of faction diversity to be a result of the magic system, but does that mean we won't have as much freedom to mix and match various types of magic?

Feel lucky; my posts are all getting eaten. I spent half an hour writing a huge epistle in response to GW, and it was pretty well written I think and it got ate. And I unwisle had not copied to clipboard before hitting submit.

bah

Ohhhh Please... I want ALPHA! ...I dont think I could wait.... ok ill stop.... or will I?!?!?!?!??!?

Need a new TBS game to play!

My questions however have been mostly answered so am good.

Yes, players will be able to create their own spells. They've went over that numerous times in the modding dev journals. Not trying to be mean but I dont want to waste a FAQ question on something that has already been answered (ex: July FAQ's..."Will there be mounts?"). Unless of course you mean something like creating a spell while you're in game.."Create a spell, spell"

How many spells do you expect a player to have access to in a given game?

Are spells available based on faction?

Are spells made available based on the number and type of nodes?

Are there going to be spells that require access to multiple elements?

What other sorts of options at game creation will add replayability to the game?

Do you foresee including any player created content (from beta) in the Canon release?

Is February 2010 still looking likely as a release date, or have the various setbacks this summer made that unlikely?

Do you often read posts in the forums?

Apparently I'm obsessive about certain questions, so I'll avoid those, even if they have not been addressed yet

So, if we want to buy paraphernalia (shirt, poster... uh, mouse pad?), is there any chance we will be able to buy them from an official source?  (I remember a teaser of some sort of shirt whipped up by marketing)

How many different landscapes are planned to be included?

I remember somebody asking about computer wall paper in the last "ask your questions here" thread, I realize I'm fairly interested in this as well.

What I really want to know is

How extensive will the RPG elements/loot system be?

Will the game have dynamic "minor" factions?

Are there other way to gain essence besides leveling up?

How easy will it be to level up?

----Pretty much any info about the RPG part of the game would be appreciated. We still don't know hardly anything about that part of the game yet.

1- Pure -->hypothesis<-- but in the case of the game selling (really) well, microexpansions a la Sins of a Solar Empire would be considered? Could some of those microexpansions be eye candy only? Could some of those microexpansion based on eye candy be about premedieval stuff and/or hightech/scifi/modern stuff? Or could the microexpansions be limited to content that fits the basic Elemental "visual/tematic feeling"?

2- Population as resource for your army and it's impact in the hamlet/town/city. I have a long document about it (but that I don't dare to post), about possible things and problems it supposes. Quite difficult to make it clear enough and that makes sense when many details interlock themselves in different points of different situations.

3- Who isn't in the alpha? A complete list, please.

How many different resources will there be on the map?

How will these resources interact?

Are you considering allowing players to 'upgrade' resources - as in, will you allow means of transforming two metals into a metal that is better than either one metal that was used to create that metal?

Where is the main focus of the game? I understand that the economy will be very simple - which is disappointing in my book since I take complex and rich over simple anytime. So since the economy will not be a major focus - since managing it will supposedly be very simple - will the focus of the game lie in the battles?

I am not sure if this has been asked before, but here goes. In elemental, the story unfolds as the player plays. Will the story develop with each and every game?

Will the story only be available in the campaign or will it be present any game?

How adaptable will this story be?

Is it possible to avoid any form of story altogether and dive right into the game by playing a standalone game - like the custom games in Civ IV?

How do you determine what spells you have access to? Is it random, or based on what shards you can hold on the map, or based on picking "books" to specialize in at the start of the game?

i hope for much rain, and a lotto win into the alpha!

I really didn't want to answer any of the questions (leave that to Brad) but this is one that I keep going back and forth on. It's definatly more rewarding, for us and the players (I beleive) to do meaty, full blown expansions where we stuff all the goods in.

On the other hand, it's A LOT of fun to have a game that supports lots of different play-styles that can be toggled on and off to make each experience even more unique. Carcasonne has this, where we can play with rivers, kings, towers, dragons, trade goods, etc etc, which are all interchangable and balanced.

I'd be curious what you guys think about this subject as the beta's move forward...big expansions or micro?

Both?  

Gah...I can't help it.

Just because the economic system is simplified doesn't mean domestic management won't be engaging...streamlining economics was done to prevent tedium, not to de-emphasize the importance of a strong imperial backbone. If we do it right, 1.0 will have players that ONLY want to build massive, sprawling cities and have their fun focusing on growing settlements and keeping their cities prosperous.

Both?

Horrible answer, but I forgive you bacause of the smiley face 

Quoting BoogieBac, reply 23

 

Both?

 

Horrible answer, but I forgive you bacause of the smiley face 

Well, I'm only half-kidding

If the quantity of quality, player content is large enough, then micro expansions might not be that interesting unless they were gameplay expansions.

I tend to favor fewer big meaty expansions over many micro expansions.

Derailing Brad's thread, tsk tsk.

I am NOT praying for rain, my guess is this will be the last chance for some R&R for Froggy for some time and I hope he thoroughly enjoys it. I actually like rain when I am camping, I really love being in a tent inthe rain for some reason...OK he didn't say he was camping, but to me going to lake means campping and fishing!   And even though fishing sucks in the rain (it's yucky AND the fish don't bite) like I said give me some interesting reading material and a tent (and NO cell phone!) and it doesn't get much better.