You're Banned!: The Forum Game
Okay, here's what you do for this game: You have to "ban" the person who posted above you for an outrageous, silly, or funny reason. Got it?
Okay, here's what you do for this game: You have to "ban" the person who posted above you for an outrageous, silly, or funny reason. Got it?
Banned for including monks in your sexual fantasies.... and are they like Scotsmen... no undies under their robes?
Banned for we do it for the free air conditioning. But it's the sheep that get it in the end, not us.
Banned for all those poor sheep who cop it in their 'ends'... and who's the monk who can lift his robe with both hands behind his head?
Banned for I ain't touchin' that one.
Banned for believing that Microsoft will, ever, create a great gui.
Banned for ye of little faith... shall be rewarded with Metro and other ghastly shit in Win 8...
.... also, banned for neglecting to mention that Stardock does it better.
Banned for mentioning Win8 in the forums.
banned for not Winning8
Banned for not winning 9.
Banned for not winning 6 and 9. Get it .... 6 and 9 .... sixty ...... never mind.
banned for lame sex joke
banned for lame sex.

Banned because there are a number of reasons that picture gives me the creeps. The missing legs are actually somewhat low on the list (although I do think that curved spring design is strange, and may not be optimal from an engineering perspective).
And double banned for that poor girl need not have been paraded like that on the forum.
And I triple ban because I agree with starkers.
Banned for agreeing with a lunatic.
Hehe, welcome to the asylum... we have padded cells in a variety of decor colours to soothe the mind and a one-size-fits-all range of designer strait jackets with colour co-ordinated shoes and matching accessories.
banned for she's not bad looking if you ignore the legs. Besides, she has a whole album of her pics published online already. I think she's comfortable with herself.
And actually those legs work quite well from an engineering perspective. I've seem some fast runners with those things. No mountain climbing though.
Banned for justification... and she's good looking regardless of her legs.
And now......
Banned [me] because it's waaaaaay past my bedtime [6.02AM] and I'm still up. F**ken insomnia.
banned for doing that to insomnia. What did it ever do to you?
And I include the legs in my judgement because some people would have trouble getting past that and I accept that everyone has their preferences or issues with a variety of things. Of course, there's a difference between judging her as a person and judging her as a potential mate. Where the latter is regarded, I fault no one for their views.
Banned because it keeps me a-fucken-wake... that's what it ever did to me.
Banned for being so philosophical and non-judgemental... whatcha want, sainthood?
Banned for that assertion... she may have been caught by the papparazzi while doing her morning exercises
Banned because assertions are highly overrated.
Banned cuz Ok then.... allegedly posed.
Banned for allegedly alleging that she posed... and did the alleged photographer pay her for her alleged services?
banned for photography can make all the difference.
And I guess the lame part would be more apporpriate prior to the attachments... hmm... but yes, it was an evil joke. I admit to having a cruel sense of humor often times.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.