Banned for Ryating
Brazilian_Joe
@Shadowhal: By Stances I mean the general attitude of your empire's government against each of the other empires and factions. It's a user-settable option. If player A sets its empire's stance (you can call it relationship) against player B as 'neutral' or 'peace', ships will not engage in combat on mere sight of player B ships. Additionally, the 'peace' stance tells the AI that it's OK to route trade ships through player B's planet nodes. With a trade alliance (implies
I have posted quite a few suggestions for a pirates overhaul which I believe fit in the 'Diplomacy' theme: https://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/351529 About the diplomacy with gaming factions, though, I haven't said anything. I will tell my ideas even if they have already been said, you should want to gauge the popularity of the ideas: One capital per star system. It could be researchable, and not as effective as the 'Empir
Banned for having a pokemon ball sticked in uranus as avatar.
Banned for going against the tradition.
Banned for not using the canonical 'Banned for...', or the only acceptable deviation 'Banned because...' form to banish grandposter.
Banned for being RIGHT.
Banned for being Qieth about the horse incident... Everyone wants to know about...
Banned for having a phallic-spaceship-in-orgasmic-cosmic-explosion as an avatar in a game forum not rated as 'adults only'
Banned for not funny enough ban
[GeneralVeers] Banned for not being choked to death by Darth Vader.
[9Soccerpro] Banned for prevailing with a stoned smiley.
I can't quote or paste inside the post text box. There may be other bugs. Had to post this one from Firefox (3.0 on Windows 7 RC).
[quote who="The Undying" reply="8" id="2230259"]Banned for being centric. And dying backwards. Undying is a proper word - it means someone who doesn't die. For antialiasing your avatar against a white background and using it on a black background. It's a white background from where I'm posting. You're posting from SoaSE, am I right? The Undying. [/quote] Banned for GrammarNaziing inside a game. For
[The Undying] For antialiasing your avatar against a white background and using it on a black background. And dying backwards.
[Scoutdog] Banned for using a gif from the 80's web as avatar - and it's not even animated.
About the fleet admiral thing...[quote who="ReiverTA" reply="10" id="2227458"]Not terribly seeing the point of the Admiral ship in that sense, really. If you think about it, a truly epic game shouldn't end up resolving around a single powerful ship - it's far more satisfying to watch squads of capitals with fleets of support craft venture forth and Lay Down The Smackdown - the US had more than one battleship in WWII, afterall, and that's always been the sense of 'capital ship' that Sins gave
For example I would like to see a 'Fleet sub-warp speed' improvement, which would boost the fleet's speed. That would counter that slow-fleets-to-a-crawl-flying-at-the-slowest-ship's-speed effect while not being balance-breaking. The tech justification is simple: warp engines are altered to operate in a sub-warp power level, which in a single ship is not enough to make a difference, but the multiple sub-warp waves of the ships resonating cause a mild space-wave distortion (like
[quote who="JSW_Ballz" reply="4" id="2217435"] Quoting wkw427, reply 3Add a third upgrade. It will deal the damage as the lvl 2 upgrade would, then 20 seconds later, it would do it agan. It gives time for cap ships to fall back to get owned =p Wait, so the entire base is going to explode... again? [/quote] OFFTOPIC: Hey did it in lethal weapon 3 or 4, not sure which.My brother brought in the rented DVD for us to watch. The Bad Grunts try to stop Mel Gi
[quote who="goodgimp" reply="10" id="2212423"] Quoting Phalnax811, reply 5 Yeah a really stupid (hopefully unintended) feature. I think it's intended. At the stage of the game where you have a L10 ship followed by lower level capital ships, it'd be safe to assume that you're dealing with fleets of substantial size. If the XP wasn't being split, you could level up a new cap ship insanely fast. IMO it would diminish the value of
Since TEC's Starbase can explode and damage everyone around, it only makes sense to add a 'shock wave' postprocessing effect dilating from the starbase in a circular fashion. It would look nice. Besides the cosmetic effect, it should also push everything away from the explosion centre. Even sructures and starbases. The closer it is, the more it is pushed away.
"select everyone and click on the enemy" will hardly get you any victories on ANY Total War game. You really must use strategy. I read E:TW has even more combat features such as cover, haven't played it though. In Medieval, you could really thrash the enemy while outnumbered if you use the proper counters. setting pikemen to halt a cavalry charge, while flanking the enemy's archers with your own cavalry. If you really manage your batallions and use the terrain in your favor (charging uphill =
Improved a few descriptions, added more information about parties, included section about mercenary nodes, and added 'Scavenger' ship.
I think it is a good mood-setting idea!
Dual 500GB disks? Meh. Wake me up when you switch that crap for 2 x 256GB Samsung 256GB SSD on RAID0 for the OS / VM / Sins / other apps, plus 2 x 2TB HD for storage. [e digicons]}:)[/e] Core i7 is a great platform though, congrats to you [e digicons]:digichet:[/e] . In theory Raid0 would be less safe, but with all the abstraction of actual physical addresses on flash, There is no such thing as 'bad blocks' , corruption is only likely if you have problematic software. If you ev