"First, those people who do evil are not committed to the service of God, they are working against Him in satan's camp. They are deceived." Believing unquestioningly is a key component of being deceived. "The Bible is clearly the transmission of God's truth." Mormons would say the same thing about the Book of Mormon. Yet, you'd say that they are "clearly" wrong. The fact is none of this is clear. It's
The last bump. Period. Either it gets removed or not. Admins are aware, the message was given the appropriate one. Done what I can do. If they want to let this kind of thing go on, fine. I don't have to take part.
BUMP.
/yawn. About that 'not having a life' thing you were tossing around earlier. Where would this little "experiment" fit in with having a wildly full and fascinating life? I wonder, if I were tossed off a site, and spent my time lurking there and stewing and finally posting under other names... would I want to project my total lack of a life on other people just to make myself feel better? Yeah... I think I would.
The thing is we've seen stuff like this in the skinning community for years. People who wander in and post other people's skins, wallpapers, icons, etc., having recolored them a little, or made them grayscale, etc. When someone points out their thievery they inevitably call the person a whiner, ask what the big deal is, etc. So ShadowWar's characteration of me isn't hitting me the way he thinks it is. I've seen this since 1999 on a regular basis. I've forced websites to take my work
"...but again, i'm not ready to convict." uh... why? There wasn't a link in the article for the first week that it sat here, even with people pointing out where it came from. He says he forgot where he got it, but you can put the first few words of the original in google and it is the first hit. So, he purposely took someone's entire article, posted it to his blog, with a few sentences pasted in. There's really no other definition of plagiari
Again, you aren't seeing it as what it is. He didn't say the Book of Enoch said something, he said ENOCH said something. We came to believe that the book was certainly not written by Enoch. How could he possibly know that Enoch said that?
Yeah, so you are just a "new user" then, lol...
Yes, yes, you're on your way to a dazzling success here. Heck, look at all the attention you're getting. You're popular in the way fleas are popular on a dog.
The word you are looking for is clique. Anyway, one look at what you've written about in the last two days shows that you most certainly aren't a new user.
Here's something to consider, ShadowWar. This isn't just JU. Paste When Sulejmen Talovic entered the Trolley Square into Google and hit search. Here's a link to the results . The five are by Robert Spencer. The next one, his article, is supposedly by you. Is that something you want hanging out of your fly?
bump. Plagiarized article.
No, I'm not. The cause to lower and prevent the raising of consent laws around the world has been spearheaded by gay and lesbian groups. Not, mind you, sex with adults, but sex with people their own age. They support laws that prevent predators over a particular age, but they avidly support the decriminalization of mid, even young teens having sex with each other. They openly opposed the effort to raise the age of consent in Canada from 14 to 16. They actively tried to prevent the r
Jennifer also plagiarized articles, if I recall. I think I even called her on it during her whole "Poor Hussein Family, the people who hung Hussein were as bad as Hussein" nonsense. I'd be more apt to believe it is someone here that is too embarassed to support plagiarism with their real account. Regardless, whoever it is is obviously projecting the 'life' stuff, because they've already devoted one of their four blogs to this, and another to critiquing all the main people who blog her
No, no. Jude didn't say that the Book of Enoch said something. If he had, then you'd be left to decide for yourself whether the book is valid. Instead, he quoted ENOCH as saying something. There's a big difference. Jude says not only that Enoch said something, but quotes him word for word. It lends, very directly, to whether the Bible is the word of God through men, or whether it is an attempt by Man to gauge God's intention and will. Here, I think it is obvious that Jud
I'm not religiously against homosexuality. Frankly, I see it much in the same way I see a lot of other self-possessed areas of sexuality, like S&M or masturbation or exhibitionism. In terms of sin its none of my business, if it is one at all. Am I comfortable with it? I'm not comfortable with treating it as if it is an overlooked equal to heterosexuality in terms of mankind in general. If people want to do it, fine, consenting adults can do what they want. I'm very, very uncomforta
What did it matter when Lucas stole articles and everyone gang raped him endlessly about it? It mattered then. What gives me the right? Uh, why do I need a right? What PREVENTS me from it? Definitely not cowards that they can't use their real account out of shame that they are defending a thief.
KFC: It doesn't matter if Enoch was a prophet, if you don't have his prophesies. It isn't as if someone went into the Book of Enoch and changed things. It's a spurious, apocryphal book that wasn't written by him at all. The Jews decided that before the Christians did. So when you say that just because a book isn't canon doesn't mean canon can't cite it, how do you go about finding out if the parts that ARE cited are true? If Enoch didn't write the book, and the only thing we have to
You are admitting, right out in the open, what you are. You can poke fun of me, but in the end, you're basically asking why it is a big deal that you are dishonest and lack integrity? Why have that eagle by your name and write about the military? OHHH, wait, you aren't writing about it, you just piece together what other people write about it. You can think that what you are doing is some sort of statement about me, but in reality every time you post you are reaffirming what you are.
The issue is your lack of integrity and your weak thieving of other people's ideas. You didn't put anything whatsoever about the fact it was someone else's until you were outed.
Stolen, uncredited article from here .
Oh, St. Augustine, also, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia. He simply believed that the work was too old to be trusted as something untampered with. He said: "But the purity of the canon has not admitted these writings, not because the authority of these men who pleased God is rejected, but because they are not believed to be theirs." In his City of God. What he didn't bother to explain, though, was how Jude came to know about what Enoch
"Just the fact that the Apostle quoted from the books points that the part they quoted was correct and without error. How do you know that? If Enoch didn't write that book, then we have no, zero, reason to believe he made that prophesy. If he didn't, then Jude is wrong. Other than a book that has been declared apocryphal, there's no evidence whatsoever to support it. The difference is, you believe that whatever the Bible says goes, then work
"Just because a verse or two was cited from books that didn't make the inspired canonical list, doesn't in any way discount the inspired book that cited it. Just the fact that the Apostle quoted from the books points that the part they quoted was correct and without error." And just because people who never met Jesus decided 300 years later what THEY thought "scripture" means doesn't mean that it was the same thing Jesus or Paul or anyone else at the tim
No. I'll keep bumping it until it is removed, or I am convinced that they know it is here and aren't going to. When that happens I delete my articles and leave. If JU is going to be a place where people can openly, knowingly steal other people's articles and indignantly thumb their nose when they are caught, I don't want to be here. I don't think that is true. Either they haven't seen it, or whoever did passed the buck to someone who hasn't had a chance to deal with it. In the mean
JoeUser Forums