Ward Churchill Strikes again

This should be against the law.

Ward Churchill at a speech tonite, was talking about how we must support Conscientious objectors, then said we should also support anyman rolling a gernade into an officers tent in order to block the war effort.

This piece of human garbage is inciting service people to kill officers in the military, saying in his eyes and the eyes of the anti-war movement they would be heroes.

Is this the kind of male we want teaching our children?

Is this the kind of male that is an example of the new liberalism?

I am outraged over this and so should all of you too.

Lets see if anyone from the far left condemns this tratiorous behavior, or calls this man a "real american"

SICK! he should be prosecuted, sentenced to death.
8,822 views 27 replies
Reply #1 Top
Drops a gernade in Ward Churchills pants.............
Reply #2 Top
KABOOM!

Well,MM, who's next on your list...mind if i help...? (Just kidding)

Yeah churchill is a pain in most republican asses... he is a double speaker/talker (can't remember the correct term) says one thing , than says another, and makes himself look like an ass both ways...well, in some peoples eyes...
Reply #3 Top
Reply By: Dr. BaileyPosted: Wednesday, June 29, 2005KABOOM!Well,MM, who's next on your list...mind if i help...? (Just kidding)Yeah churchill is a pain in most republican asses... he is a double speaker/talker (can't remember the correct term) says one thing , than says another, and makes himself look like an ass both ways...well, in some peoples eyes comments like this thats tearring out our countries hearr.,
Reply #4 Top
The tolderant left strikes again. Peace is the answer, not war. Put a grenade in a tent and kill many people, that will help the anti-war cause.

Are these people just plain stupid? Where is the "outrage" from the democratic Senators who demanded Rove apologize?
Reply #5 Top
People like Churchill aren't the Demacrat party, but when you see what lengths they go to avoid distancing themselves from him, sometimes you gotta wonder.

I too respect the rights of consciencious objectors, but if a person is calling for troops to kill other troops, how on earth is that being a "consciencious objector".

There used to be a word for that.. it was called Sedition. Now apparently treason is no longer a capital offense, but what the far left (and I do mean FAR left) consider "Freedom of Speech".
Reply #6 Top
Reply By: Dr. BaileyPosted: Wednesday, June 29, 2005KABOOM!Well,MM, who's next on your list...mind if i help...? (Just kidding)Yeah churchill is a pain in most republican asses... he is a double speaker/talker (can't remember the correct term) says one thing , than says another, and makes himself look like an ass both ways...well, in some peoples eyes


--*stares* wow...oh well, IYO, i said mine...i was bding sarcastic btw...but never mind...i bid you adieu mm...
Reply #7 Top

The tolderant left strikes again. Peace is the answer, not war. Put a grenade in a tent and kill many people, that will help the anti-war cause.

That was the modus operandi of the 60s 'peace' movement.

But Moderate, I disagree.  Let him continue to speak.  Like Howard Dean, he is one of the strongest voices for conservatives out there.  We dont have to come up with slogans.  We can just play back their statements and ask (the 80% of Americans who are very rational) is that what they want.  The sane left cant stand those clowns, and the loony left is writing the speeches.  And the rest of America is just tsk tsking.

Reply #8 Top
forget my last comment...*feels idiotic*...
Reply #9 Top
Hey dog, the left only tolerates a hate bush agenda.
Reply #10 Top
5 by ParaTed2k
Thursday, June 30, 2005


People like Churchill aren't the Demacrat party, but when you see what lengths they go to avoid distancing themselves from him, sometimes you gotta wonder.

I too respect the rights of consciencious objectors, but if a person is calling for troops to kill other troops, how on earth is that being a "consciencious objector".

There used to be a word for that.. it was called Sedition. Now apparently treason is no longer a capital offense, but what the far left (and I do mean FAR left) consider "Freedom of Speech".


while I agree with C.O. status I don't supportn "after the fact C.O." i AM STILL WAITING TO SEE THE moderate dems distance themselves from the lunies of there psrty.
Reply #11 Top


{{{{{{{whip}}}}}} what really got to me was the huh rounds of applause.
Reply #12 Top
9 by Dr. Bailey
Thursday, June 30, 2005


forget my last comment...*feels idiotic*...


mm sprays lucas with Z"idiot away" body lotion.
Reply #13 Top
#8 by Dr. Guy
Thursday, June 30, 2005


#6 by Dr. Bailey
Thursday, June 30, 2005


--*stares* wow...oh well, IYO, i said mine...i was bding sarcastic btw...but never mind...i bid you adieu mm...


have a real good rest of the day,tell yasmina I said congrats on the marraige.
Reply #14 Top
by Dr. Guy
Thursday, June 30, 2005


But Moderate, I disagree. Let him continue to speak. Like Howard Dean, he is one of the strongest voices for conservatives out there.


I do believe in free speech with all my heart, BUT he has gone to far.
Reply #15 Top
#16 by little_whip
Thursday, June 30, 2005


Give us a link to the speech, hun, I want to quote it elsewhere.


I still have not figured out how to insert a link.
Reply #16 Top
clearly there must be a line between free speech and incitement. If your paraphrasing is indeed true to the original statement, then I'd really like to know where that line is, cuz if this guy doesn't end up a eunuch for such a statement, it seems to me that such a distinction is gone.

maybe just type in the url in a message, then someone can turn it to a link for ya
Reply #17 Top
Still waiting for someone anyone from the left to disavow this asshole churchill>>>>>

I am dissapointed that I have not hear or seen one person say anything about this.
Reply #18 Top
Reply By: Demosthenes LockePosted: Thursday, June 30, 2005clearly there must be a line between free speech and incitement. If your paraphrasing is indeed true to the original statement, then I'd really like to know where that line is, cuz if this guy doesn't end up a eunuch for such a statement, it seems to me that such a distinction is gone.maybe just type in the url in a message, then someone can turn it to a link for ya


check out shadowwars article about this subject.
Reply #19 Top
what really got to me was the huh rounds of applause.


I don't believe for one second these people are just a small group. The democratic party supports and tolerates peopel like this.
Reply #20 Top
This worthless waste of human flesh is "still" drawing air? I'm amazed someone hasn't shot him yet!
Reply #21 Top

I don't believe for one second these people are just a small group. The democratic party supports and tolerates peopel like this.

They not only tolerate them, they promote them!

Reply #22 Top
This worthless waste of human flesh is "still" drawing air? I'm amazed someone hasn't shot him yet!


I wonder, would he consider it as ok if someone "fragged" him? Or is murder only ok if someone else is the victim?

What a cowardly stinking bit of rancid tallow!!!
Reply #23 Top
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Thursday, June 30, 2005what really got to me was the huh rounds of applause.I don't believe for one second these people are just a small group. The democratic party supports and tolerates peopel like this.


I am watching vietnam again, slow at first then a ground swell of protest.
Reply #24 Top
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, June 30, 2005This worthless waste of human flesh is "still" drawing air? I'm amazed someone hasn't shot him yet!


not only has he not be shot, he has not even been fired from his job. disgusting pig that he is.
Reply #25 Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Friday, July 01, 2005I don't believe for one second these people are just a small group. The democratic party supports and tolerates peopel like this.They not only tolerate them, they promote them!


The silence here is deafening, NOT ONE LEFTY saying ward is a bad person and they do not agree with him.