Harassing fellow bloggers

stop it

I have recently read a bunch of threads that are nothing but pure harassment of fellow bloggers.  These type of threads are completely in violation of the Terms of Use of this site.

If I see these types of threads in the future, they will be removed from the forums.

This type of behavior is not acceptable.  People should be able to blog here without being harassed.

24,367 views 102 replies
Reply #1 Top
THANK YOU!!
Reply #2 Top

Was it me with my Troll of the month award?
Reply #3 Top
Was it me with my Troll of the month award?


KG said there were a bunch of them.
Reply #5 Top
Err, I think she was referring to you, JFJ


But not you, right? Nah, couldn't be.
Reply #7 Top

I'll admit I was a little naughty
Reply #11 Top
If she were, Icon, she'd tell me directly, she's not shy like that.


She hasn't told anyone directly. der. You're one of the worst.
Reply #12 Top

LW's Cat Naming Contest

I was verbally abused, he said words that were very hurtful to me.
Then I fell down the stairs and my shoes fell off!

Anyone?...

(Jerky boys....)
Reply #13 Top
I think many people fail to make a distinction between what Karma is talking about and blogs that are responses to ideas put forth on other blogs. I was accused of such an offense when I responded to Guns are for killing with Guns are not for Murder.

I don't see anything wrong with rebuttal, and I can't seen how people confuse retort articles with demanding whether someone is a "homo" or whining because they were blacklisted.
Reply #14 Top
Btw, Icon, which of the following threads were "pure harrassment


I didn't say your blogs. You contributed to one of someone else's.
Reply #15 Top
I personally consider I Take It Back to be one, L_W, but then I don't speak for JU.
Reply #16 Top
Me, I'm an argumentative fellow. Nothing like a heated debate to get the old circulation flowing, I always say.

So, while I can count on little_whip to be stupendously annoying in every single post, it would never occur to me to complain that I'm being harassed. I simply assume that I come across as equally annoying to L_W, and that we both find some kind of perverse pleasure in being annoyed by each other's remarks.

JFJ, on the other hand, gets nothing but bannination from me. I have faith in KarmaGirl's judgement, and in her ability to distinguish between the two.
Reply #17 Top

The winning name (which did not originate in JU) was Darth Meeps.

I figured there would be a meeps in there!

Reply #18 Top
Frankly, Gene, if I wanted any of your crap I'd squeeze your head. Keep banging the troll button and take what you get like a, well, like the human you are...
Reply #19 Top

Personally, I consider B.S.'s going from thread to thread continuing his crusade to be harassment. He just doesn't have enough sense to let it go. He apparently thinks it is more important to keep it alive.

Personally, I think you need to take a chill pill.  I dont know what you have against half the members here, but you do seem to want to harpoon instead of discuss.

I expect better of you than that.

Reply #20 Top
What Dr. Guy said. You can't seem to let it go, Gene. You even come over here on KG's article and do the very thing that she's referring to.
Reply #21 Top

As for having something against "half the members" here. There are thousands of members. I challenge you to support that statement.

I did not mean that literally.  just figuratively.  As your conflagaration grew, so did your black list.  And it made me wonder why?

That is all I meant.

Why?

Reply #22 Top

What Dr. Guy said. You can't seem to let it go, Gene. You even come over here on KG's article and do the very thing that she's referring to.

Icon, I do wonder why for those that seem to be so rational.  I accuse nothing.  But Gene has been a good debater and I just wonder why he has gone so far off on this issue.

yes, I want to know.  I do not want to prolong it.

Reply #23 Top

There can be no response if there is nothing to respond to.

I wish you would reconsider it.

Reply #24 Top
Urm, Gene, if I wanted to refer to you in particular I don't think I'd need to be subtle about it. I was just pointing out that many people think referring to another article in any way is "retaliation", which it isn't. The reason it came to mind was because you had accused me of it in PB's case, sure, but I'm not the kind of guy that needs to bitch about you in third person.

Your vanity aside, if you have to wonder if I am talking about you in particular, then I'm not. When I decide to address you, I'll make sure you know I am talking about you.

Reply #25 Top
And you left WC's board for this B Street?

btw, Hi Sweet Thing! Purrrr...