Moderateman Moderateman

Why do Joeuser Liberals resort to name calling.?

▼

Why do Joeuser Liberals resort to name calling.?

Disagree with them and be slandered.

from JoeUser Forums
Just a fast question, why is it when anyone disagrees with the so called liberals here, most noteably dabe, myrrander, colgene and a few others, they immediatly resort to name calling.. oh yeh add bigrickstallion to this list, and reikihouse.

I can disagree with people on principle without name calling, why can't they?

Is it because they take stands on the unstandable? or take issue with anything someone from the right says?
Or can it just be they are mean spirited asses, small minded people that tolerate no opinion but there own?

One inquireing mind wants to know
blogging
6,355 views 37 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
Umm what about one of your recent articles where you call people idiots, and in this one you refer people as asses. Is that not name calling?
Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top
Have you finished your assignment junior?


I have an assignment?
ObjectDock - Access shortcuts and frequently used applications from an animated dock.
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
I have an assignment


Children! Psigh.

yes, you are to write I will not disrespect my elders (blog it) 100 times before being let off of restriction!

Want me to revoke your Star Wars priviledges? Get cracking Junior!
Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top
#26 by Phoenixboi
Monday, May 23, 2005


Umm what about one of your recent articles where you call people idiots, and in this one you refer people as asses. Is that not name calling?


yes it's name calling. BUT its not saying phoenixboi YOU ARE AN ASS> get the difference?
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
ummmmmm and where is A PERSON ATTACK>? AS in I think so and so is an idiot? or moron?


Dude, your original post was about name calling, not about personal attacks. If you wanna make it about personal attacks, then write that. But as far as name calling goes, go meet all the other kettles, Pot.

-A.
Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: AngloesquePosted: Monday, May 23, 2005ummmmmm and where is A PERSON ATTACK>? AS in I think so and so is an idiot? or moron?Dude, your original post was about name calling, not about personal attacks. If you wanna make it about personal attacks, then write that. But as far as name calling goes, go meet all the other kettles, Pot.-A.


ok pan... will do.
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
I agree in principle, even though I'm what you would call a liberal. Generalisations are fine, if these are recognised as such. But name calling on a personal level is completely unnecessary. It is counter-productive and immature. All it demonstrates is the writer's inability to cope with conflict.

Well said, mate.

Cheers,

Maso
Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top
32 by dynamaso
Monday, May 23, 2005


agree in principle, even though I'm what you would call a liberal. Generalisations are fine, if these are recognised as such. But name calling on a personal level is completely unnecessary. It is counter-productive and immature. All it demonstrates is the writer's inability to cope with conflict.

Well said, mate.

Cheers,

Maso


again I say you are level headed and a liberal, these days these two things do not necessarily go together.
Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
ok pan... will do.


See, this is what ticks me off about you. My point was entirely valid, on topic, but you ignored it. Why? Can't you fight it? Don't you understand it? Or would you rather just whine defensively than admit that you're wrong? But you fixate on one tiny aspect of it, the part where I metaphorically pointed out your hypocrisy, rather than face an argument that says something you don't want to admit.

Congratulations, you've just invalidated yourself.

-A.
Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top
ok pan... will do.


See, this is what ticks me off about you. My point was entirely valid, on topic, but you ignored it. Why? Can't you fight it? Don't you understand it? Or would you rather just whine defensively than admit that you're wrong? But you fixate on one tiny aspect of it, the part where I metaphorically pointed out your hypocrisy, rather than face an argument that says something you don't want to admit.

Congratulations, you've just invalidated yourself.


To you, maybe. But not all of us would feel that way. And if you want to get technical about it... nowhere in this post did he call anyone a name! All he did was ask a question!


Or can it just be they are mean spirited asses, small minded people that tolerate no opinion but there own?


This is a question not a declarative sentence! Note the question mark at the end of the sentence? So in reality your point was not valid. Which is probably why he didn't respond.
Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: AngloesquePosted: Monday, May 23, 2005ok pan... will do.See, this is what ticks me off about you. My point was entirely valid, on topic, but you ignored it. Why? Can't you fight it? Don't you understand it? Or would you rather just whine defensively than admit that you're wrong? But you fixate on one tiny aspect of it, the part where I metaphorically pointed out your hypocrisy, rather than face an argument that says something you don't want to admit.Congratulations, you've just invalidated yourself.


gee now my day is ruined because you have invalidated me. oh what to do. oh worry, worry worry.
Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top
Or can it just be they are mean spirited asses, small minded people that tolerate no opinion but there own?This is a question not a declarative sentence! Note the question mark at the end of the sentence? So in reality your point was not valid. Which is probably why he didn't respond.


Well doc since when does a question mark make any distinction to someone looking to poke holes??