General Pants General Pants

Should we ask Stardock to postpone Crusade and fix the game we have?

Should we ask Stardock to postpone Crusade and fix the game we have?

Does anyone else want the game we have to work before we get a new one?

Having just encountered my umpteenth previously-discovered, still-unresolved glitch in this game, I find myself again reconsidering my commitment Gal Civ 3. It seems everywhere I go in the game I find bugs, 'unintended features,' or lackluster performance. In nearly every case, these problems are known, and have been for some time. I am not a pro gamer, I don't know how much polish is expected of a released game, but I never had this many problems with GC2, or Civ5, or Shogun, certainly not over a year after release.

I love this game, I have a huge investment of time and energy in this game, and given the dependence on crowd-sourcing for additional content, I'd like others to remain invested as well. Gamer support is unquestionably vital to the success of a game and a game company. However, I imagine support drops off rapidly when things don't work the way they are supposed to.

I therefore ask my fellow players for opinions on this question: does it seem to you that Stardock is serving your interests by working on a major expansion for a game that has been accused of working more like a beta than a finished product? Should Stardock concentrate limited resources developing new parts of the game when the old parts still have glaring, fun-killing problems? Or should they hold off and use that time and effort to allow the present game to live up to its full potential?

I am a wary of buying a new car from someone who already sold me one that doesn't work right. Do you consider the game complete enough to warrant another major expansion? I understand that a second expansion is part of the de rigour game company business model now. I am as excited as the next person to find out what is in it, but isn't there a point at which you as a gamer should withdraw your support for a game rather than encourage business practices with which you disagree?

If you feel strongly about this, I would suggest lettering the developers know in a constructive, positive manner. I've seen a lot of disparaging remarks here and on Steam, and I don't think they help anyone. Suggesting a solution and offering support is a lot more helpful than yelling. However, if people are as frustrated as I am, we need to at least try to engage the devs on this.

 

Is there a point at which you as a gamer will withdraw your support for a game and move on? 

322,177 views 57 replies
Reply #52 Top

Should we ask for something they would never do?

Isn't posting a question about if a request should be made in a place where the ones who would receive the request the same thing as making the request?

Could I think of a third rhetorical question?

Yes

Yes

No

Reply #53 Top

 

Quoting iRedEarth, reply 52

Should we ask for something they would never do?

Isn't posting a question about if a request should be made in a place where the ones who would receive the request the same thing as making the request?

Could I think of a third rhetorical question?

Yes

Yes

No

 

Hahah, however I do agree, I think they should fix it first:)

Reply #54 Top

Wouldn't it be nice to find lots of fixes in it?

Reply #55 Top

No, it is ready barrings some bugs that are being ironed out. Its perhaps the best expansion for a game I have seen in years. 

Reply #56 Top

Isn't Crusade the fix?

Reply #57 Top

Ok the 2.0 isnt great you can always find bugs, and make patches, but what is broken it is a good game.