Phoon Phoon

Wrong Version Listed on my apps

Wrong Version Listed on my apps

Using the new method of downloading and installing your apps.

DesktopX Pro 3 is SUPPOSED to be v 3.50.018, however the actual file downloaded is 4.00.017. Please fix this as I refuse to use that worthless version. :)

The non-pro version is the correct download however.

Thanks

91,882 views 95 replies
Reply #51 Top

 

I'm just going to abandon DesktopX and use Visual Basic.

Reply #52 Top

my appologies to Doc for being a complete asshole to him in public.

( Issues worked out in private and I promise only to call him an asshole in private messages in the future ) :grin:

Reply #53 Top

;) ... and buy that Oragel. Makes all the difference in the world.  

(Still lurv ya mate. But if Po' finds out he'll shop us into oblivion. He's the jealous sort. And he sucks.)

Reply #54 Top

Meanwhile, back to waiting on the real DX4

Reply #55 Top

My bad, seems I posted on another thread when I should have posted here.  :blush:

Reply #56 Top

So I just received this email today regarding this ticket.

WTF? Why is it up to me to continue to communicate with you when you are doing nothing at all to correct the problem?

You simply choose to close the ticket due to your inactivity?

-----------------------------

This message is regarding your Ticket ID #GWC-818040. We are changing the status of this ticket to 'Closed' as we have not received a response from you in 48 hours. Should you wish to reopen the case, simply reply to this message and the ticket will be reopened.

   Subject: Wrong version listed on My Apps link
   Department: Activation / Account
   Priority: Support
   Status: On Hold
--------------------------------

Reply #57 Top

Quoting Phoon, reply 56
Should you wish to reopen the case, simply reply to this message and the ticket will be reopened.

(fyi that does appear to function properly.)

Reply #58 Top

Quoting DaveRI, reply 57
(fyi that did appear to actually work for me.)

I did just that Dave. However that action should not have even been necessary given the lack of action taken by SD on this 3+ month old ticket.

Reply #59 Top

Ya I just wanted to let you know it seems to be working, I had wondered a bit when I tried it.

Reply #60 Top

I'm wondering how I will be able to utilize the DX3.5 Pro let's say, a year from now.

Impulse is gone. It's a gamestop app and I am NOT a gamestop customer.

In my current environment I would have to now reinstall Impulse to archive DXPro 3.5 with no promises that it would even recover on a different system should this one crash.

My OD subscription expires in a few days. Impulse will be complete toast after that anyway.

For the life of me I cannot understand why you fail to fix this issue. 

Reply #61 Top

Makes me wonder about backups at stardock. Cannot believe there are no backups of old installers...

Reply #62 Top

BTW, just found a "DesktopX35_professional.exe" from December 2008 on my backup-harddisk. Could that one be of any value to anyone ?

Reply #63 Top

That might work with one little tiny exception.

I found that as well, but the serial number listed on my apps DOES NOT @#$%ing even work with it!

+1 Loading…
Reply #64 Top

Phoon, your issue is not being forgotten or ignored.  It's the first ticket we see most days.  I'll look for a specific installer for your needs but we don't want to clear your ticket (or the symptom issue) until we have a solutions in place in case it affect more people and we need a control.

Reply #65 Top

Zubaz,

Thank you for providing information that is something other than the email I received noted in Reply#56.

When one hears nothing at all on an issue then gets an email like that, it causes blood pressure to skyrocket.

No one has ever told me that you guys lost the installer. One would assume you had something other than what impulse offered.

I do have the file that c242 mentions in #62 but as I said, the serial listed on my download page does not work with it.

Thank you Z. I'll have to give you a pass on a couple spelling issues now... :)

Reply #66 Top

I'm a little hesitant to wade in, but I'm not sure I understand how the automated support system is intended to work and this might be a good place/time to get it clarified, Zu.

I've had this experience:

  1. I submit a ticket.
  2. I get an automated reply acknowledging the ticket (with the admonition to resist all temptation and to NOT reply to the acknowledgement).
  3. At some point thereafter I get a response from support requesting additional information or giving some instructions with a request for feedback.
  4. Within 48 hours I reply with the requested information or feedback.
  5. A few days later I get an autoreply saying the status of my ticket has been changed to Closed for lack of a reply within 48 hours.
  6. I reply to 're-activate' my ticket.
  7. A few days later I get another autoreply saying the status of my ticket has been changed to Closed for lack of a reply within 48 hours.
  8. Repeat steps 6 thru 8.

If I let a cycle go past 48 hours, a few days later I'll get an autoreply saying the status of my ticket has been changed to Closed for lack of a reply within 120 hours.

Mind you, all the while these email exchanges are going on, my problem is being actively worked on by support staff.  But I only know that through private emails or PM's outside the formal eSupport system.  I'd like to think that the above experience is not the intended course of events, but 1 thru 8 is what has actually happened, and it's hard to imagine my experience has been unique.  Those of us not brazen enough to nag SD staff outside the eSupport system must surely be confused and frustrated by the way this 'system' works.

(And, Yes, I know, eSupport hates me. :grin: )

Reply #67 Top

The support PEOPLE are great. The support SYSTEM is the biggest piece of crap I've ever seen.

Reply #68 Top

Quoting Phoon, reply 67
The support PEOPLE are great. The support SYSTEM is the biggest piece of crap I've ever seen.
Thanks for that.  :)
Quoting Daiwa, reply 66
I'm a little hesitant to wade in, but I'm not sure I understand how the automated support system is intended to work and this might be a good place/time to get it clarified, Zu.
The system works really well when we're not dealing with Impulse transitions (still) and eSeupport hiccoughs.  Earlier this week we were answering tickets withing an hour of getting them and talking about other projects we wanted to get done.  That lasted a day.  ;)

We're looking at eSupport updates, process improvements, and staffing modifications to provide better service because we really want to have people happy with their interactions with Stardock.  We also hate it when people are pissed at us.  Believe it or not, things are getting better on the back-end.  We don't talk about it much because it's a progression and no one is ever happy unless it's done.  It makes me nutty to announce something is getting done (like the CursorFX update) and then it takes weeks longer because we want the job done right . . instead of "right now".

Thanks for all the understanding you all have.  And thanks for helping out with the issues that come up in the forums.  I don't know what we would do without the community being a part of the team.  This really is the best place on the internet I've ever been a part of.  Thanks.

Reply #69 Top

I second Phoon's comment.  I've never encountered anyone at SD who wasn't entirely professional, focused and helpful, and I've been around since Jafo was a skinner.  ;) You guys are the best.  Thanks to all of you for listening.:*

The 'system' - ah, somewhat different story.  I hope the confusing aspects get sorted out soon.

 

Reply #70 Top

UPDATE:

Well, the latest BETA for DXPro (3.96 which worked just fine) no longer appears as an option to download.

DXPro 3.5 is actually there now but the serial number provided does not work. AHHHHHHHHHHHHH

 

Reply #71 Top

Phoon would be correct.

Reply #73 Top

Well, shoot.  Looking into it...

Reply #74 Top

It looks like Pro works fine, though Phoon may have had a bad serial.  I updated that for you, so take a look at your new serial and give it another shot.

DX Standard 3.5 is indeed having issues with OD serials, it seems.  Will let you know when I know more.

Reply #75 Top

Quoting Rosco_P, reply 74
It looks like Pro works fine, though Phoon may have had a bad serial. I updated that for you, so take a look at your new serial and give it another shot.

And mine? Pro won't activate for me either.