Might be something like gOS, http://www.thinkgos.com/index.html

For what it is worth, I would like ot see M$ get some comp. It has been the king for to long and simply sits on its ass now and charges outrageous prices for the basically the same tuff repackaged and forgets small things. For example, ever try to back up your Outlook files? Cant with the MS backup program. How many years has Office been out? It is really sad that I have to pay nearly $40 to a third party developer for the simple one click backup option.

google vs. microsoft is like bad vs. bad. google the purveyor of advertisements and collector of personal data against microsoft, the block bully.

if I read this all correctly, this google os is for those that spend most of their time on the web and would be able to access various productivity programs via the google site. (no database was referenced within the article). I guess that one would be able to save the files to their own computer or probably leave them on-line???

who in their right mind would give google (or any other company) access to business sensitive material and/or inadvertent personal data. google spys on it's customers.

how about support? google has NO support! ms support, obnoxious as it is, is far superior.

little unfair and mixing apples with oranges. been tempted to use outlook but never have but office has greatly improved. was using office 2000 and had to upgrade when we bought new computers as we misplaced the key. while I find myself adding functions to the customized toolbar (the layout is not intuitive) I am impressed by the improvements.

I suppose Google is expecting a big trend toward 'cloud' computing, which is quite possibly the scariest thought I've had all month.

As long as it's skinnable!

But given Google's history with prehistoric interface design, somehow I doubt it...

Hey they can go for it, I personally will not use it as I do not wnat my files kept somewhere else except on my Hard drives and the various media I have. I just do not trust GOOGLE as far as privacy issues. I only use Google Search period.

Cloud computing and a horde of computers controlled by one of the world's largest corporations..... Sky Net anyone?

I dont think I'm mixing "apples and oranges". The round about point was that being able to backup a primary file for a program is a fundamental function in my opinion, yet in six (I think)  versions of MSO that feature is still not an option! Hence my "sitting on its ass" comment.

As a supplemental OS on a supplemental PC . . I like it and wish Google much luck.

So long as it's skinnable eh?  Wouldn't matter that Google would use it to data mine and collect personal info/PC/surfing habits to its own advantage... not yours????  Not in this lifetime... not on my PC!!! Being skinnable does not make the Google OS any more attractive... certainly not more trustworthy... if you didn't trust a diamondback rattler before you dressed it in mink, why would you trust it afterwards!!!!

And how does using only Google Search protect you from Google snooping?\

On the WWW your PC and IP address is identifiable... the moment you submit a query to Google Search you compromise yourself and your privacy.... open yourself up to targetted ads based on key words contained in your search reference.  So yeah, use Google Search and Google Mail and they lay claim to your internet history for their own purposes.

This says it all......

And Using Google's OS would serve only to enhance its ability to spy on users. Not bloody likely!  Not Here!

I trade data for services with google.  I do it knowingly.  There is some data I don't/won't upload . . . but most . . I will.

As an additional bonus . . the more info I share with google . . the better their services are for me. 

I use the little grocery card the same way.  The more then ytrack my purchases teh better they can serve me and then I'll go back to their store.

Zubaz, you do realize that you're providing free marketing data to these stores. I do the same thing, don't get me wrong, but I don't think they are doing this to better serve us. I don't think their motives are altruistic or with you in mind. you're just a number to them that they can apply data to. how better to part you from your money.

There isn't a winner/loser here.  There's an exchange.  I controll part of that exchange though and am cool with it.  Right?

It's teh same with Google "services". 

Ah, but what if NOTHING is sacred to Google's new OS... and EVERYTHING is fair game???

I mean, given Google's spying reputation, are you really going to trust their new OS not to pry into data you'd rather they NOT see?

Or is that a case of the more you share/they track you, the more they know what to promote and what to withhold... in other words, limiting your choices to benefit themselves and clients rather than shed light on opposition goods and services.

Many people dislike Microsoft because it is so large and powerful in the OS world... some even going to the length of calling it a monopoly, yet Google is on the exempt list and they flock to it like it's some sort of God or something.  Like WTF is wrong with that???

I'll tell you what's wrong with it!  Google already collects and stores personal data illegally/without consent... something that law enforcement require a warrant/court order to do, and the more powerful Google becomes the greater chance there is that your personal data will eventually be used against you.... because Google is in the business of making money at ALL costs, including sinking various/certain individuals as a means to an end.  As it is, you can do a Google search on just about anyone and get information they'd rather you not see... info that should NEVER be made public knowledge, particularly withour consent.

Ah, but can't you see that by tracking your purchases (everyone else's) they csn stock shelves in such a way as to limit your options... sell what they want you to buy, rather than offer alternatives you otherwise may purchase if given the opportunity???  This is not servicing you or the general public... this is a few large companies using technology and other slimy practices to squeeze out smaller competitors, and Google hopes to expand its evil empire by offering a freeby to entice, then suck from users all it can to advance its goals

The fact is, Google never offers anything for FREE... there are always strings attached.  They may not always be obvious or visible, but you can bet your ass they're there.

What I want from an OS is something that will work - i.e. will be compatable with the various programs and games I choose to run. Unfortunately it sounds like google is pitching this OS at those people who don't care about such things, so I doubt it will prove any real competition to MS - my only hope is it acts as a small incentive for them to improve on windows more than they otherwise would.

I went and re-read the links in the OP.  Google very well may be able to find a niche in the netbook market just as some software developers have found a niche in the iPhone and similar devices. 

I don't see this much of a concern though in the larger PC market, but then what the heck do I know. 

Sorry starkers . . that argument doesn't fly.

Google is pitching this OS in the hope that people disgruntled with Vista will go to the new google OS instead of trusting microsoft again. They are counting on google's reputation for things that work, and that many people do not know just how much google spies on its users-on everybody.

The problem is you do not choose what data you "give" to google, to use your analogy, if you let the cops look around once they have your permission they can look anywhere. An OS could read everything on your hard drive and anything in memory, i'm already catious about giving microsoft that ability, giving it to google is just scary

Other possible issues with Google OS: http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/features/article.php/12297_3828841_1/10-Reasons-Why-Chrome-OS-Is-No-Windows-Killer.htm

Eventually like all things Mocrosoft will be a thing of the past. Something to think about. I don't think Google can do it but sooner or later someone will.

Hi Havent been around forever, but I'm back - and looking forward to continue being creative

Google have been successful with many things, and so have Microsoft. They have both created things that everybody use on an everyday basis. In my mind, can't it be kept that way? By creating a new operating system, Google are (possibly) making things complicated in that standards would have to change if everybody liked the new OS.

But by all means, I can't wwait to see Google's Chrome OS. Would like to see if they stick to their word about being clean, streamlined, and easy to use.

And best of all, it's free!

Yeah, but... so is linux. They basically took linux, and stripped out the meat. I guess it will be lightweight, but I can't see it being much more than that.

True - but then again, they haven't said much about the system itself, so we'll have to wait and see.

nothing is really free, you'll have to register with google and supply them with some personal information and you'll have to agree to their terms and conditions. devil will be in the details. Microsoft is the same is a sense, they have that validation process to ensure that my copy of windows is genuine. the information they collect along with that includes other ms product information which includes browser preference. personally, it's all about marketing and there is not much difference in the two in that respect.