Draginol Draginol

Ambition for Ambition’s sake

Ambition for Ambition’s sake

As some of you know, I started out in life with relatively little. It’s one of the reasons I don’t tend to be the most sympathetic person towards people who spend their entire lives being poor. 

Americans who are chronically poor, in most cases, can look at their own poor choices as being why they’re in the state they’re in.  The remaining are people who are physically more mentally disabled and those people I have endless compassion for.

Being wealthy doesn’t mean you’re better than others. It just means that you have managed to adapt yourself to the social/economic conditions of your environment.  That happens to be a skill I’m reasonably good at.

For me, wealth has never been a goal. Freedom is the goal. I want to be free to do what I want which requires a threshold of wealth to be obtained. Beyond that, I don’t care. I’m not heavily motivated to build empires of wealth just for the sake of building empires – particularly if it results in some loss of personal freedom.

Different people have different levers that motivate them. Some people crave respect. Other people crave adulation. Still others use wealth as a score card to live a life of achievement. And there are of course people who crave material wealth because that’s what makes them happy.  For me, it’s what I said, freedom. I want to do what I want to do.

I’d argue that I have a form of narcissism. Not the self-love kind but rather excessive self-ego. I do care about other people and how what I do will affect other people but I relentlessly pursue my own personal agenda.

A normal company of our size wouldn’t have its CEO out on the forums mixing it up with customers. And for good reason – I’m pretty rude and unprofessional. When I get into the mud with some disgruntled customer, it makes me and my company look amateurish and it costs us money in terms of business.  Clearly, since I know those things and will still continue to hang out on the chat channels and the forums chatting with other users rather than using an alias or having “handlers” do that sort of thing I must have other priorities  and I do – being able to do what I want.

In my experience, most people who are wealthy are people who have become extremely adept at doing what they are doing. And what they are doing produces wealth that enriches them.  What happens, in many cases, is that the means becomes the end – their ambition becomes the goal rather than the means to a concrete objective. It’s a path that I think leads many people to have regret later in life.

Some people, which we’ll generally call “losers”, look at the most successful people and think they’re greedy. If only that were the case. The most successful people are often people who are achieving for achievement’s sake with money being the scorecard. That is what I am trying to avoid. 

Sometimes, when I get busy, I will nearly forget why I’m working so hard. Because I happen to be so good at what I do, new opportunities arise to do even more – the ambition starts to become an ends unto itself.  So I have to remind myself why I do this – freedom.  The freedom to live my life as I see fit. To able to be the husband I want to be for my wife and the father I want to be for my children without having to compromise.  It’s often a delicate balance between sticking to ones goals and controlling the urge to let ambition take over.

10,046 views 29 replies
Reply #26 Top

Quoting SlyDrivel, reply 20


My idea is a little different, though it certainly overlaps. I think Frogboy and me have different personalities. As a CEO, he probably likes to take charge. I am ok with taking charge, but I enjoy solving problems more. I really missed my calling as an engineer. Whereas Frogboy sees success as being at the top of a big company that creates great computer games, I see success as creating a great computer game. In the end, I probably got the raw deal on personality. But what can you do?

End of SlyDrivel's quote

I didn't take what you wrote as insulting so don't worry.  

But I don't I communicated what my motivation is well enough.

What you seem to describe is a motivation for power. That's not my motivation. I don't care about being in charge of a company.  It's much more basic than that: I want to do what I want to do. 

 

Reply #27 Top

Quoting Draginol, reply 24


I don't think I'm a particularly good game designer, I'm just a very very experienced gamer so I tend to have a feel for what game mechanics will work in practice.

End of Draginol's quote

 

I'd say that's what makes a good game designer to me: understanding what game mechanics work and create a balanced game.  And having really good AI helps in the games you guys make alot too because they are mainly strategy games (as opposed to FPS's or an RPG game).

 

 

Reply #28 Top

Out of curiousity, what other game designers would you consider good also?  I consider Sid Meier another really good designer because of the mechanics and balance he gets out of his games (not including the games that just have his name on it for marketing).  Molyneaux I would consider not good because his ideas outweigh his actual implementations usually imo.

Reply #29 Top

What you seem to describe is a motivation for power. That's not my motivation. I don't care about being in charge of a company. It's much more basic than that: I want to do what I want to do.
End of quote

Interesting. I can see what you mean. You worked hard so that if you wanted to change your company and start creating great computer games, then you could do it. You had the freedom to do that. And if tommorow you had another idea, you could run with that. That sort of freedom takes a lot of effort.