Oppression

Government and Governance

February 9, 2009 7:08 PM from

GalCiv2 had a very rough allusion to oppression in that certain Government Types could raise more in taxes at the expense of requiring higher approval levels to stay in power. I think it'd be interesting to see this taken a step further, and allow rulers in Elemental to have varying levels of oppression on their people. Higher or lower oppression have different costs/benefits:

Oppression:
Pros:
Lower chance of rebellion
Can cut off trade to other kingdomes
Can conscript troops more quickly and more cheaply
More black market activity

Cons:
When rebellions happen, they're worse
Other kingdoms/empires won't like you as much, especially if they have low oppression
More black market activitiy

As always, thoughts and comments are welcome.

36,512 views 5 replies

Reply #1 February 9, 2009 7:52 PM from

Elemental Forums Top

wait, both pro and con are 'more black market activity' so... >_>; yeah.

I vote that less oppression means less black market activity, because more would be out in the open.

Master of magic had a tax system that would effect how happy people were with you, I figured there would be something similar rating happiness that would factor in by oppression (people can be oppressed and still be happy)

Reply #2 February 9, 2009 9:59 PM from

Elemental Forums Top

True, but it would be nice to see a slightly more complex mechanism than the one we had in GalCiv II where you simply had happiness, population growth and taxes; I really like how Ynglaur's suggestions enrich this aspect.

Another thing is to consider oppression in captured areas, which could work in a similar way as Centurion or Master of Magic as you mentioned it: some people are more resistent to oppression or will revolt faster. Or something a bit akin to Alpha Centauri, if we continue down the path of similarities: oppression is only possible if you have a sufficient force of troops on site.

Or how about a militaristic government type that allows for a high level of oppression (and conscripts of course Ynglaur) but it will cause a rebellion in areas where you lose a battle? Makes for a more riskier playstyle.

CursorFX - Customize your Windows cursor

Reply #3 February 9, 2009 10:21 PM from

Elemental Forums Top

I think a factor to include with the oppression vs. revolt is how many generations have been oppressed. If it goes from free country to iron curtain in 1 generation, there IS going to be talk of revolt. However, if over the course of many generations 'big brother' slowly closes his fist, then there won't be a sudden backlash of revolts, especially of there is strict oppression of free-trade with non oppressed peoples or new ideas that would bring thoughts of non-oppressed kingdoms.

Reply #4 February 9, 2009 11:26 PM from

Elemental Forums Top

I like Noctilucus' idea of oppression by geography a lot. Oppress some peoples, and coddle others.

I figured black markets can thrive at either extreme. Under very oppressive regimes, there's a strong incentive to avoid The Man. In very open regimes, there's lax oversight. It's probably lousy economic theory, though...:p

Reply #5 February 10, 2009 5:21 AM from

Elemental Forums Top

Landisaurus: that could be slightly harder to implement though; I like how it goes against GalCiv II's mechanic where morale would slowly decrease over time (in case you were in debt or too long at war).

Ynglaur: so the conclusion is that the black market always thrives? I think that's pretty much consistent with reality :p

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!