Hmm ... I still don't recall making any claim to sainthood, nor any claim to absolute certainty on any particular issue. I've granted that there are those that deny global warming is an issue and don't go chasing every last one of them down in an attempt to convince them of the error of their ways. I acknowledge that on any issue you name there will be a wide range of opinion that reasonable people may hold and that someone that doesn't share my viewpoint isn't necessarily a moron or an idiot.
First, sainthood. The insulting post with no swear words in it. That was one of your miracles, a requirement for obtaining sainthood under catholicism. It's called a joke. As to specifically being one of the anointed, slightly less a joke, but still a joke. The anointed refers to pushy liberals that want to subject the rest of the population to their help, whether they want it or not. I have also already told you that I myself am included in my list of idiots.
You on the other hand profess "So much inaccuracy, so little time" as if it's somehow your responsibility to correct all of it and it does appear, to me anyway, that there is no room in your philosophy for anyone that has any belief that you don't share. And yet you then intentionally seek out those that disagree with you apparently just so that you can call them morons because it amuses you.
I call everyone a moron, posting in these threads isn't any active seeking on my part. It's a weakness, a pull I lack the discipline to make myself avoid most of the time. I see the offending title, read the offending thread, and comment on the offending posts. It's fun to argue, particularly when it's pointless. It's always pointless on the internet, although I've heard claims and rumors of people convinced by arguments on the internet.
The gun control bit. It's called a hypothetical. Being one of the anointed, I ventured a guess that you'd be pro gun control. Generally, people that are for state run health care, think we're going to destroy the world by returning a piddling amount of CO2 back to where it came from, and generally go stark raving mad when a right winger calls them names on the internet, are also anti gun because "guns" kill people. It's clearly a hypothetical regardless of your stance as I used if in a liberal manner.
Subject free, my question is, would you refute misinformation provided by a supporter of your side, or let it slide. If so, is that not equally dishonest as the spreader?
GW, bite me. If you're going to label me as food, you have to pick our own stuff. Right wingers don't eat foreign food after all. Also, it's been -25 here in Anchorage, I've been wearing shorts and an unlined leather jacket while walking to stores, and sweating while I do it. Pansy. 
Elemental Forums
Sins Forums
GalCiv2 Forums
