Why do liberals think they are so smart?

I've written about this many times in the past but one of the more off putting features of American liberals is their smugness.  If you disagree with them it is only because you are either ignorant or evil. This tends to result in them losing elections. Often.

I just read a very interesting blog about this that I thought I'd share here:

This conceit of liberals -- which sometimes I think is all that sustains them, and all that keeps them liberals in the first place -- that liberals have some sort of a monopoly on brains, wit, taste, and, yes, even basic humanity will be their undoing. It always is. They keep making the same mistakes over and over and over and over again, and we're the dumb ones.

They, the ones who have made the same ten mistakes every single election since 1968, are the smart ones. Right?

Let's check the list: Demean an opponent who you really ought to suspect might be rather intelligent as an ignorant boob, bordering on a genuine diagnosable moron, to such a degree that when the candidate speaks and reveals himself as reasonably intelligent, he actually seems to be nearly a genius.

Demean those who don't live in "cosmopolitan" cities as bumpkins who have nothing to contribute to politics or culture -- not their own ideas, their own aspirations, their own fears, their own traditions -- except for the votes they're expected to cast for the Democratic elites who scorn them.

And all the rest of it.

Now, after the fact, the left is convulsing and gnashing their teeth. How could we have allowed ourselves to so demean Sarah Palin as to turn her home-run speech into a genuine star-making speech by lowering expectations so much through our derision!?!

How could you have done that, you ask. That's not the right question. The right question is Is it even possible for you to avoid doing that?, because you do every. Single. God. Damn. Election. Cycle.

It works in my favor, and yet I'm still horrified to see you doing it every time.

Have you ever done anything else? Are you capable of doing anything differently? Even as conservatives snicker at you and tell you to your smug fat faces that you're making a gross strategic error, you continue doing so just the same!

We don't even bother to hide our snickering at you any longer. We don't bother to conceal this basic error from you -- we simply declare it. We don't have to hide this, we don't have to try to avoid tipping you off that you're making this mistake for the thirtieth time, because we know you won't listen anyway!

That's the truly delightful thing about this. We don't have to scheme with each other and say, "Quiet down, don't give the game away," when a fellow conservative points the error out. It doesn't matter! We can scream this from the rooftops for all the good it does you.

It's like we're fighting a war and we don't even have to bother coding our messages to the troops because we know there's no chance at all you'll even bother to pause to read our communications. "Don't bother us with your silly orders and tactics and strategies," you tell us, "We can figure out how to beat you silly people well enough on our own without any of your stupid-brained help."

You can? You sure about that? Well, whatever, buddy. If you think so. Seems to me you guys are 3-4 since 1994 -- a losing record -- but if you guys want to keep following the same game plan, be my guest.

Ultimately the liberals' sin is their smugness. Not even so much because most people recoil from the assumption of superiority, both intellectual and moral, by those who have accomplished nothing exceptional in life except for reliably voting and "thinking" liberal, as if casting a vote the "correct" way slaps 30 points on to your IQs and counts for 100 hours of community service and child mentoring.

No, the main problem with that smugness, that belief that you're sooo very fucking clever, is that you're actually not particularly clever at all, and the great gap between your personal estimation of your intelligence and the actual real-world measure of it is wide enough to stumble into and take a painful fall. Perhaps if you weren't so very convinced of your own innate entitlement to rule, you'd spend less time seething at a public unwilling to concede that rule to you, and less time trying to trick the public into voting for you by concealing your true beliefs, and more time trying to figure out what the public actually wants in its government, and how to provide with them with that.

You know the big difference between conservatives and liberals in terms of political acumen? You guys never see this stuff coming, because you're so convinced of your innate right to control other people's lives. You convince ourselves you're always the smartest guys in the room, and anyone who disagrees with you must either be so stupid or so luminescently evil they could never prevail in a campaign.

The Ronald Reagans and Sarah Palins surprise you, because you just can't even conceive of them. Your entire sense of self-worth depends on the proposition Liberal = Smart, Good, Conservatives = Stupid, Bad, so you can't imagine clever, good people opposing you.

You go into every election thinking the score is already 24-0 in your favor -- after all, you have nothing but vicious, racist, gay-bashing hobo-killing morons in your way. How can you, the Moral and Intellectual Elect of the Earth, possibly fail?

And yet you do. More frequently than you win.

Eh. I don't know why I'm bothering to tell you this. As you've demonstrated in every past election, you're not going to listen anyhow.

Ya fuckin' dunces.

Oh, and... Good job so demeaning her you half-convinced the public she was a drooling imbecile and yee-haw hollerin' bumpkin who'd embarrass herself on stage.

Sure, sure. Smart move.

A former beauty queen -- who could have imagined she might be comfortable in front of a large, critical crowd, and might in fact even thrive in the spotlight?

A former television sportscaster -- who would have predicted she'd have some poise and savvy playing to a camera?

Amen. I have run into this in discussions with family and friends when politics come up. I try to avoid talking politics because, like many of you reading this, I keep up with it very closely, I'm pretty knowledgeable on the topic.

Most people, left or right, aren't that up on the issues. Yet, despite their lack of relative knowledge on the issues, they will presume to be more enlightened or educated simply because they hold left wing views.

82,277 views 88 replies
Reply #1 Top

You know, I really don't keep up with political issues as much as other people on here, but I acknowledge that.  There's only so many hours in my day and political news is somewhere around the middle for me. 

Just curious though...you've posted avoiding arguing with friends and family alot...are they mostly liberal then?

A few of my friends are liberal, or what I would call liberal, but they don't seem to have the kind of characteristics described in that article.  Maybe they are just moderates compared to liberals you have talked to.

Reply #2 Top

Liberals never claim to have any common sense. Intelligence doesn't have to include wisdom.

Reply #4 Top

He's right...

Often I find myself arguing with a Liberal on a topic to have them point out multiple facts from the past (hindsight is 20/20, right?) with no facts as to why decisions are made.  When I say "Decisions are made based on evidence presented at the time.  Haven't you ever looked back and said 'Well gee, that was dumb... guess I should finish and follow through though since I started.'" and have them stutter while they remember a few times, but not want to admit that the real reference was a Middle Eastern Conflict.

Better, I don't think we'd actually be in this Middle Eastern Conflict (as I refuse to call it a war, regardless of what Congress agreed to... and I served over there before anybody gets up in arms) if we had finished the job in the first place.  The biggest issue is that we pulled out in the 90s, not that we went back in this decade.

That's what Liberals do... they make snap judgements, and implement policy, that then is had to be dealt with when a Conservative takes office.  By that time, the Liberal is out, after coasting on the Conservative Policies, and the Conservative is cleaning up the Liberal Fuckups (excuse my language).
Yes, Clinton did it... ALOT... that's why he got Impeached, and Bush never even had a slap on the wrist.  And I think that's why we're in the situation we're in today, as apposed to after 12 years of Conservatives where the Clinton Administration cruised afterwards.

PS: DemiGod is the shizzle.

Reply #5 Top

One of my friends told me yesterday "There's no logic in being a republican" thinking that I wasn't a conservative. I asked him "Why?" and his response was "No intelligent person could believe that the world is only 6000 years old."

It confused me. I mean, I'm not a relgious person at all, but I'm still a conservative. Which is something I explained (in a, gasp, logical manner) to him and then he acted bewildered at the mere concept of an atheistic conservative. The conversation then went towards me just being subconsciously racist and planning to vote for McCain/Palin was just a cop-out for not feeling comfortable voting for Barack Obama.

Apparently, in my friend's head (who said there's no logic in being a conservative), a conservative can't just disagree with some of Obama's positions on health care and his foreign policy but, instead, has to be subsconsciously racist. I also can't stand Biden's views on net neutrality, which is the only point my friend and I agreed on.

Reply #6 Top

Amen. So many of these liberals believe that you have to vote for the black guy, because he's black. Why? Why would I vote for the white guy because he's white? There's no difference, and the implication that there would be one is a step backwards. Ergo, I will not vote for Obama, because he's a non-religious religious-poser, ex-Marxist, ex-cocaine addict, and an ex-alcoholic, not to mention his politics. Even if I were racist, I wouldn't vote for him anyways.

Reply #7 Top

It's sort of like this Democratic relay race cartoon

-

Reply #8 Top

"Amen. I have run into this in discussions with family and friends when politics come up. I try to avoid talking politics because, like many of you reading this, I keep up with it very closely, I'm pretty knowledgeable on the topic.

Most people, left or right, aren't that up on the issues. Yet, despite their lack of relative knowledge on the issues, they will presume to be more enlightened or educated simply because they hold left wing views."

 

Seems to me you are really not all that knowledgable on politics. You simply repeat the same spin that the politicians of one party put on another. To truly understand politics is to understand both sides of the issues because they affect people in different ways.  Take a good look then you might notice there are both liberal and conservative elitist, both liberal and conservatives who demean others that have opposing views, intelligent people in both camps and dumb-asses on both sides of the fence.

Reply #9 Top

Seems to me you are really not all that knowledgable on politics. You simply repeat the same spin that the politicians of one party put on another

Point proven Brad.

Reply #10 Top

Why is it when a lefty states something it a "hard cold fact, yet when a righty says the same thing it's called "spin"?

The perfect example of the Liberal wing of the Democratic party is the behavior of Hillary Clinton in the primaries, She felt "entitled" to the nod for the Candidacy for a shot at POTUS. Her main resume was that she was FLOTUS and knew how things were run. This sense of entitlement is the basic stance of the Liberals, a simple sense of "I know what is best for you" and they {meaning the entire right wing} don't!

Reply #11 Top

Ergo, I will not vote for Obama,

You're 15.  You can't vote anyway.

Reply #12 Top

I'm pretty knowledgeable on the topic.

Yet, despite their lack of relative knowledge on the issues, they will presume to be more enlightened or educated simply because they hold left wing views.

Me smart. They dumb. Conservative good! Liberals bad!

Boooooooriiiiing.

I've read this argument a thousand times.

To this day, it still amazes me how completely fleeced folks are over the illusion of an election you'll be participating in. Essentially, you have the choice between Coke, or Pepsi. Which, at the end of the day, is no real choice at all.

Or, as a Russian fellow once said, you get to choose between

"the capitalist party, or, the other capitalist party"

Reply #13 Top

Essentially, you have the choice between Coke, or Pepsi

Nah - More like Dr. Pepper or Sprite.

Reply #14 Top

Quoting Dr, reply 13
Essentially, you have the choice between Coke, or Pepsi
Nah - More like Dr. Pepper or Sprite.

mmm Sprite... wait... Sprite's Republican isn't it?

 

Democrat's aren't less clever (or more stupid) than Republicans. The difference is, more Democrats pretend Republicans are.

Reply #15 Top

Dr Guy-

Nah - More like Dr. Pepper or Sprite.

You know, if you mix coke with amaretto it tastes just like Dr. pepper. And has a better side effect too. Sprite would have to be the republican drink, though, because that's all that the real party boss (Cheney) drinks. When he's not shooting his friends in the face..... Sorry, bad joke I know :(

Reply #16 Top

Seems to me you are really not all that knowledgable on politics. You simply repeat the same spin that the politicians of one party put on another. To truly understand politics is to understand both sides of the issues because they affect people in different ways. Take a good look then you might notice there are both liberal and conservative elitist, both liberal and conservatives who demean others that have opposing views, intelligent people in both camps and dumb-asses on both sides of the fence.

Nice that a liberal steps forward to prove Brad's point.

Being Brad's wife, I can assure you that he is very knowledgeable of both liberal and conservative political philosophies. Our bookshelves are filled with the books from authors from both sides.  Given that he designed The Political Machine and wrote the issue neutral descriptions, did the research on the issues I think your comment that Brad doesn't know much on politics bespeaks the liberal attitude that those who don't agree with them just don't know anything. You may not agree with his views, but he definitely knows his stuff.

And yes, his family is mostly left of center.

Reply #17 Top

Everyone believe's they're right and anyone who thinks differently is wrong. Hell, some poeple actually believe that anyone who isn't rich is stupid, lazy, or both. Elitism is everywhere and for the most part it just demonstrates ego as opposed to reality.

Reply #18 Top

Why is it when a lefty states something it a "hard cold fact, yet when a righty says the same thing it's called "spin"?

 

Totally untrue...Both sides spin every issue. And there are people in both camps that think their side contains the hard cold facts.

Reply #19 Top

Being Brad's wife, I can assure you that he is very knowledgeable of both liberal and conservative political philosophies.

 

Then why does he make posts that imply the same stereotypes that are simply the same drivel used by political pundits? The crap that comes out of the mouths of radio and tv pundits is not politics its entertainment at best something akin to that performed by circus clowns.

Reply #20 Top

Brad,

I've personally experienced both left and right people have those characteristics in the article you quote.  I've noticed both parties having their own characters that have that annoying unjustified confidence in their own correctness.

 

I mean, obviously, you're a bright guy to build up a pretty successful company.  So I think it's simply really easy to project personal experiences into some kind of universal truth.  Maybe you just happen to have more personal experience with leftists having that type of smugness?  I'm guilty of the same thing and it's really hard for me to force myself to step outside myself and notice that I'm doing that kind of projecting. 

 

Seriously, I'm not saying that to be uber-PC...I really haven't noticed just one side having representatives that are annoyingly sure in their own minds of the correctness of their views and the other side just doesn't 'get it'.

 

I've seen people from both parties say somethign or carry themselves in a way that makes me shake my head and decide to just get back to building my super cool robotech minatures.

 

-Rattasak

Reply #21 Top

Quoting MasonM, reply 17
Everyone believe's they're right and anyone who thinks differently is wrong. Hell, some poeple actually believe that anyone who isn't rich is stupid, lazy, or both. Elitism is everywhere and for the most part it just demonstrates ego as opposed to reality.

Some political philosophies are more prone to elitism than others. 

Reply #22 Top

Then why does he make posts that imply the same stereotypes that are simply the same drivel used by political pundits? The crap that comes out of the mouths of radio and tv pundits is not politics its entertainment at best something akin to that performed by circus clowns.

Sometimes...often times, stereotypes are true.  Moreover, if I have a different opinion than you, it does not, by definition, mean I don't know what I'm talking about.

Reply #23 Top

I mean, obviously, you're a bright guy to build up a pretty successful company. So I think it's simply really easy to project personal experiences into some kind of universal truth. Maybe you just happen to have more personal experience with leftists having that type of smugness? I'm guilty of the same thing and it's really hard for me to force myself to step outside myself and notice that I'm doing that kind of projecting.

Let me ask you this - how many times was the Democratic convention interupted by a right-winger attempting to disrupt it versus the Republican one?

In 2004, Bush's speech was interupted by a left-wing disrupter who snuck in.  In 2008, both Palin's and McCain's speeches were either nearly interupted or were interupted by left-wing disrupters. 

We hear all about Palin's 17 year old daughter getting pregnant. Meanwhile, Biden's son gets indicted on fraud and there's barelya mention of this even though it's happening right now.

By contrast, not since 1968 have the Democrats had problems from significant political agitators and that's because after 1968 they essentially joined the left wing movement themselves.

Why is it, whether it be on a college campus or a political meeting that conservatives are much more likely to be assaulted for their political opinions than liberals?  How many times has Michael Moore been assaulted on stage for giving a speech versus Ann Coulter?

When Bush was re-elected, we heard plenty about how stupid the American people are.  We heard about "Jesus Land".  And every Republican, whether it be Bush I or Bush II or Reagan or Ford or Eisenhower on down is always considered to be "stupid".

This isn't an issue of "projection". This is an issue of that is pretty obvious. 

As the article makes abundantly clear (which I didn't write) is that each election, liberals blow it by insulting the vast chunks of our population that don't share their political ideology.

Don't believe in human created global warming? You must be dumb or ignorant or brain washed.

Think everyone, including the rich should have their taxes cut? You must be stupid or just selfish.

Supported the invasion of Iraq? You must be an idiot or are some sort of chicken hawk.

Where is the right wing version of Democratic Underground or Smirking Chimp or Moveon.org?

Just compare the nastiness that Palin has gone through in a week with the treatment Obama has gone through. 

 

+1 Loading…
Reply #24 Top

We hear all about Palin's 17 year old daughter getting pregnant. Meanwhile, Biden's son gets indicted on fraud and there's barelya mention of this even though it's happening right now.

Yes, and dubbya knowingly lied in order to start a war that killed thousands and shredded your constitution to the point that he's basically a "unitary executive", what with warrantless domestic surveillance and now torture being back in vogue. And he said that if anyone in his administration was found to be involved in the outing of an undercover CIA agent that they would face the full force of the law. And then when that happened, he pardoned the fella right away. And what price did he pay? Articles of impeachment have been filed against him but will go nowhere. Clinton got a BJ and damn near got thrown out.

How many times has Michael Moore been assaulted on stage for giving a speech versus Ann Coulter?

How many times has Michael Moore advocated killing one's own countrymen, or invading muslim countries so that we can "kill their leaders and force them to convert to christianity"?

And every Republican, whether it be Bush I or Bush II or Reagan or Ford or Eisenhower on down is always considered to be "stupid".

Says who?? Eisenhower is one of my favorite U.S Presidents. Actually, if it weren't for that little business in which he okay'ed the coup in Iran (the after effects we're still living with today) he might just in fact be my # 1 pick. His speech on the Military-Industrial complex was prescient, and if he were here today I think he'd kick dubbya's ass in a heartbeat!

George Bush 1 is another of my favs. He was smart enough to understand that an alliance with Russia was far more important than an alliance with smaller eastern european nations, and so, he stayed true to his word and didn't expand NATO eastward after the fall of communism. GB the 2nd, however, seems to think that the world is a game of risk and has given up that alliance in order to get meagre territorial gains and place troops and weapons on the border with Russia, which is not a smart move by any stretch of the imagination!

As the article makes abundantly clear (which I didn't write) is that each election, liberals blow it by insulting the vast chunks of our population that don't share their political ideology.

On this one I agree with you 100 % However, you'd be better off using the word "democrats" here instead of liberals as the two aren't the same thing!

Supported the invasion of Iraq? You must be an idiot or are some sort of chicken hawk.

I supported the invasion of Iraq. I was fool enough to believe dubbya's speech about mushroom clouds and chemical weapons and remote controlled drone aircraft that Iraq was planning on using to deliver all those nasty WMD's to wipe us all out!

Where is the right wing version of Democratic Underground or Smirking Chimp or Moveon.org?

hee hee! Well, http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/*/index comes to mind right off the top of my head. http://blog.heritage.org/ is also another good one. There's lots out there which I'd be more than happy to come back with if you'd like!

Just compare the nastiness that Palin has gone through in a week with the treatment Obama has gone through.

I agree with you that Palin shouldn't have been smeared. No one, actually, should be smeared at all and there is no defense for it at all. However, Republicans are just as guilty. I seem to remember during the last election a bunch of Republicans wore purple band-aids to make fun of Kerry's purple hearts that he received after being wounded in combat.

Reply #25 Top

Sometimes...often times, stereotypes are true

But for every left winger who snuck into an rnc convention to disrupt it...there are millions who dont and woulndn't

And for every right winger that has blown up an abortion clinic there are millions who dont and wouldn't.

 

Some people fit certain stereotypes and other don't.  Personally I would say most dont particularly when it comes to political stereotyping. The most liberal people and conservative people that I personally know don't even come close to fitting in the political stereotypes that the pudits have created.