kryo kryo

Firefox 3 Sets World Record?

▼

Firefox 3 Sets World Record?

from JoeUser Forums

Following Tuesday's release of Firefox 3, and despite a couple of server downtimes (due to the huge demand), the Mozilla Foundation has announced that the new version of their browser was downloaded more than 8 million times in the first 24 hours of availability! Their claim to the record of most downloads in one day is still being verified by Guinness, but it's still quite an amazing feat.

Personally, I've only just gotten the browser this morning (I first tried during one of the above mentioned downtimes), but already it seems tremendously faster than Firefox 2. I haven't really had much chance to look into the new UI elements just yet, but at least most of my add-ons (all the important ones, anyway) had updates available, and so far they all seem to be working well.

What does everyone else think so far, especially those who weren't previously Firefox users? Is Firefox 3 going to make you switch from IE or Opera? If not, why not?

[more]

92,459 views 36 replies
Reply #26 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
I'm not gonna switch from Opera. It's just not good enough to give up Mouse Gestures and the mail client for
End of quote

Furthermore Opera 9.5 was released a few days before Firefox 3.
So I really don't see why I should switch from Opera to Firefox.
Siege of Centauri
Reply #29 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
Plug/Troll https://forums.wincustomize.com/315706
End of quote


Thanks andrew. That post completely made my day. 3.0 is a half-step back for me. I don't see how it is faster (is it because I have a high-end rig and the improvements aren't noticeable . . . ?) and I think the overall UI is terrible.

Maybe it'll take some time to get use to, but I'm considering using Opera regularly. I got use to Firefox, I can get use to Opera (which is just as fast, imho that's the most important thing).
Reply #30 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
All the spewing of this browser being faster than that browser is just mainly exaggeration of fanboys. I spent a week with each major browser not long ago in a personal search for one I liked and found there to be no discernible speed difference between any of them. They all take the same amount of time for initial load and then based on your speed, surfing can be almost instantaneous with any of them.

It really came down to compatibility and features. FF is still more bare bones when it comes to built in features, but if you don't mind installing plugins you can still get all the extras offered by Maxthon or Opera(the two most feature rich browsers).

Compatibility across the net is still in IE's court, though thanks to the last two versions everything else sucks about it.
Reply #31 from WinCustomize Forums Top
It really came down to compatibility and features. FF is still more bare bones when it comes to built in features, but if you don't mind installing plugins you can still get all the extras offered by Maxthon or Opera(the two most feature rich browsers).
End of quote

That's why I (and others) like it so much, the fact that it is so customizable and we can add so many features/themes to it through the plethora of addons available.
Compatibility across the net is still in IE's court, though thanks to the last two versions everything else sucks about it.
End of quote

If by that you mean INcompatibility in displaying pages and adhering to standards...then sure.


Reply #32 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
If by that you mean INcompatibility in displaying pages and adhering to standards...then sure
End of quote


lol. I more meant most sites seem to be coded with IE in mind over other browsers ;) . That doesn't mean that it will work right but it is supposed to. This site is perfect example of that. There's a big announcement at the top about the site not being optimized for use with FF3, yet it works a hell of lot better than IE does here, which I must assume would be the recommended browser to use since FF3 isn't.
Reply #33 from WinCustomize Forums Top
I believe the announcement simply means that since FF3 just came out in final, it might be a while before those "issues" get addressed. As for being coded with "IE in mind over other browsers" from what I've heard from a lot of developers, they spend more time fixing issues to work in IE since it seems to render things according to its own "standards." I've had to do that very thing on my own blog: if browser is IE, use this class, if anything else, use this one. Annoying.
Reply #34 from Sins Forums Top
I believe the announcement simply means that since FF3 just came out in final, it might be a while before those "issues" get addressed. As for being coded with "IE in mind over other browsers" from what I've heard from a lot of developers, they spend more time fixing issues to work in IE since it seems to render things according to its own "standards." I've had to do that very thing on my own blog: if browser is IE, use this class, if anything else, use this one. Annoying.
End of quote

I've seen sites that refuse to support IE. Maybe it would get them to use a real standard, not their funky made up one.
All the spewing of this browser being faster than that browser is just mainly exaggeration of fanboys.
End of quote

Not always. FF3 takes 1-2 seconds to start-up, vs. 6-7 for IE7. Logging in to Hotmail, takes about 2 seconds for FF3, 6-7 again for IE7. For me, at least. It's not much, but it adds up.

Extensions really are FF's biggest asset. I listed my favorites on the last page. Yes, I am a fanboy.
Reply #35 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
I've seen sites that refuse to support IE.
End of quote


And that's the only reason I have FF2 on my computer. Some websites are designed to intentionally crash IE, raising fanboy-ism to new heights.

I've actually seen another employee walk into where I work, ask to use the computer to look something up, then download Firefox onto it instead of using the IE that was already there. You can't tell me that he wanted faster load times (he used FF a whole 30 seconds) or extensions, or anything else. He simply refused to use IE. I use the site he went to all the time, and it works perfectly with IE.
Reply #36 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
As for being coded with "IE in mind over other browsers" from what I've heard from a lot of developers, they spend more time fixing issues to work in IE since it seems to render things according to its own "standards." I've had to do that very thing on my own blog: if browser is IE, use this class, if anything else, use this one. Annoying.
End of quote


So I have I. I've had to throw in extra code to get things to line up correctly. Eventually I just threw in a line about how the site is optimized for Firefox.

And I find Firefox much faster than IE. Same is true of Opera. Pages do not load instantaneously for me in IE. Yes, program load times for IE are quicker, I'm more interested in page load times. I'm surprised people don't find IE to be slower, but to each his own.