Microsoft SP 3

Should I ? Shouldn't I ?

So its official then ..... Assuming it has been tested extensively .......  Is it NOW safe to download from Microsoft Update page ? ..... And has anyone had any serious issues ?

If they had , does a system restore fix it all back the way it was ? ..Just wondering ...

 

14,130 views 50 replies
Reply #1 Top
No problems here! ;)
Reply #2 Top
Is it faster, better, safer ? Whats changed then,WebGizmos ?
Reply #3 Top
I had a complete system malfunction from SP3. There's been other posts on this. It may be limited to HP computers with AMD processors but, I'm not completely sure of that. When I tried to updtae to SP3 my system would no longer bootup.

I got the BSOD. I could not get any restore point to work, not even the one MS set just prior to the update. I had to do a complete system restore to SP2 and lost many hours of my time and work as a result. I right now have auto-update shut-off and will not download SP3 until MS and HP adress this problem and there is a specific a response from them that this SP is completely tested and safe for my computer.

Downlaod it and install it at your own risk just like MS states.
Reply #4 Top
It may be limited to HP computers with AMD processors but, I'm not completely sure of that.
End of quote


It's my understanding that despite being warned by MS, HP used the same image for AMD systems as they had created for Intel systems. VERY stupid on HP's behalf. They earned the malfunction honestly (or dishonestly) and were kind enough to pass it on to their customers. I'm really surprised this has not reared it's ugly head before now.
Reply #5 Top
I installed it about 2 weeks ago, and have had absolutely no problems. I just have a pretty basic intel laptop. I haven't noticed any differences in performance or anything else.
Reply #6 Top
It's my understanding that despite being warned by MS, HP used the same image for AMD systems as they had created for Intel systems. VERY stupid on HP's behalf. They earned the malfunction honestly (or dishonestly) and were kind enough to pass it on to their customers. I'm really surprised this has not reared it's ugly head before now.
End of quote


I'm unconvinced by this logic that it's HP's doing for the following reason:

MS writes the code that installs SP3. As I understand it, the problem occurs because this service pack installs an Intel chip driver and replaces my AMD chip driver. This causes the BSOD and looped booting.

I have numerous software apps that have no problem indentifying I'm running an HP computer with an AMD chipset. If these apps can easily do this so can MS. Therefore, MS has absolutely no business force installing an Intel chip driver on my AMD machine and thereby rendering it useless.

As you can tell Phoon, in my mind, the primary fault for this is MS.
Reply #7 Top
I'm unconvinced by this logic that it's HP's doing for the following reason:

MS writes the code that installs SP3. As I understand it, the problem occurs because this service pack installs an Intel chip driver and replaces my AMD chip driver.
End of quote


If this were true BDBF.. then ALL AMD chip PC's would be affected.
Sorry, this one is HP's doing.
Reply #8 Top
If this were true BDBF.. then ALL AMD chip PC's would be affected.
End of quote


Why? Your point doesn't address my contention, namely MS wrote the install HP didn't. MS is pitching the idea it's HP's primary fault. In my mind it's MS's primay fault because MS and only MS had the capacity to avoid the problem. To wit, test for Intel or AMD chipsets, install the new correct chip drivers as needed.
Reply #9 Top
Oh, I wanted to add HP denies the MS contention they used the same image for all installs. HP has indicated that isn't true, they used different install images for different computers.
Reply #10 Top

Users, led by Jesper Johansson, a former program manager for security policy at Microsoft and currently an MVP (Microsoft Most Valuable Professional) who works at Amazon.com, identified several causes, including one limited to HP-branded systems. According to Johansson -- and later, Microsoft itself -- HP used a disk image created on an Intel-powered machine to factory-install Windows XP on AMD-based PCs. Microsoft had advised computer makers against doing that as long ago as 2004.

An errant reference in Windows Registry for an unnecessary device driver -- "intelppm.sys," a power-management driver designed only for Intel-based PCs -- causes the XP SP3 upgrade to install that driver to AMD systems, said Johansson. That causes the PC to fail to reboot when it restarts after the update. Because most XP machines are set by default to reboot on a failure, the PC reboots repeatedly; some users have had trouble interrupting the endless reboots and regaining control of their computers.

HP did not explicitly admit the problem was its fault, but confirmed some details of Johansson's analysis. "The affected HP systems do not have an Intel driver loaded onto them, but there is a services registry entry that SP3 appears to be recognizing as an instruction to load the Intel driver, subsequently causing the failure," HP said in an e-mailed statement Thursday.

End of quote


Source:
WWW Link
Reply #11 Top
Just for some information here, I have a non-brand name pc with an AMD processor and when I installed it I got the endless reboot. So, based on that it's not just an HP issue. I read somewhere (and if I can find it again I'll provide the link) that the problem was with xp sp3 installing the intel driver even if you have an AMD processor which was causing the BSOD and the endless reboot. Just 2 cents or maybe 3! he,he
I did get lucky enough to be able to choose my boot device by pressing F8 while booting and then it would boot. SO...I was able to do a successful uninstall through ADD/REMOVE and uninstall SP3. RAD
Reply #12 Top
Haven't installed it yet but interested to see what responses there are about this.

Reply #13 Top
To wit, test for Intel or AMD chipsets, install the new correct chip drivers as needed.
End of quote


Read the above article. If a system image contains registry entries that say there are Intel drivers then the SP will install such. This is a direct result of HP using the wrong image which was cloned from an Intel system. It's not MS's fault that HP used a half assed shortcut instead of actually taking the time to build a proper image.
Reply #14 Top
Just for some information here, I have a non-brand name pc with an AMD processor and when I installed it I got the endless reboot.
End of quote


I had not heard of it occurring in non HP systems. Hmmm.
Reply #15 Top
I use regular registry cleaning software that is supposed to indentify and remove all invalid, obsolete registry entries. Do these software programs work? Who knows.

I think your source is a little to pro MS oriented and, although I will not take the time to research this further, I just bet there is other "analysis" about this that the problem is with the SP3 install.

From my standpoint, SP3 is no way until it will install without this horrible system crash. I saw a supposed fix for this posted but, I'm not one to experiment especially if it will cost me in excess of 72 hours of work to correct.

Sounds to me like more BS(from Intel/MS) to cause people to become disastified with their computers and want new ones with new problems. So long as they're Vista machines with Intel chips, that is.
Reply #16 Top
The freakin adds are back again for the zillionth time. I've a paid subscription through 2011 to WC for an add free WEB expience. I don't get that either but, it's an inexpensive subscription.

I wonder if WC records an advertising hit for these occurances and Google sends a little more scratch in. Ha ha Ha. :LOL: 
Reply #17 Top

I think your source is a little to pro MS oriented and, although I will not take the time to research this further, I just bet there is other "analysis" about this that the problem is with the SP3 install.
End of quote


All you have to do is google "sp3 amd problem". The instances of the endless reboot have been primarily confined to HP machines and other OEM (non branded) machines where they used an image created from an intel based system.

Sounds to me like more BS(from Intel/MS)
End of quote

Not from as many sources as you will find on a google search.


Reply #18 Top
The freakin adds are back again for the zillionth time. I've a paid subscription through 2011 to WC for an add free WEB expience. I don't get that either but, it's an inexpensive subscription.
End of quote


Must be a BS Intel/MS/SD thing... :LOL: 
Reply #19 Top
Guess I won't be updating to SP3 anytime soon, since I have an AMD processor on a homebuilt system.
Reply #20 Top
Ok Phoon let's be a little more realistic. Googling or using any search software is a manipulated product. Everyone in the industry has educated themselves in how to get these search engines to return "favorable" hits for their products. So, the average user should use some caution and get information from a variety of sources before reaching conclusions based on a WEB search.

So how about COMPUTERWORLD? Are they a competitive source for info. Here's a link. WWW Link Numerous industry experts from other companies say the problem is with the MS installer. I agree. MS wrote a defective installer that has adversely affected all AMD based computers. At least according to MS and other sources all AMD based computers were affectd.

By the way I used Yahoo and searched Windows XP Service Pack 3 only. After wading past the MS hyped links I found the COMPUTERWORLD listing.
Reply #21 Top
yeah, this whole internet thing is one big conspiracy created by Michael Moore and Bill Gates. It's just terrible.
Reply #22 Top
Phoon, Thank You for the info and a link to the article. I now understand why my HP AMD computer could not install SP3. I thought it was me!!! ;p 
Reply #23 Top
yeah, this whole internet thing is one big conspiracy created by Michael Moore and Bill Gates. It's just terrible.
End of quote


Na, I'm no conspiracy theorist. Just know when there's millions and even billions of dollars at stake, Google will produce a first page hit that is best for it's own business as best it can. Furthermore, there are quite literally positions at companies for WEB experts and search engine experts because there is money to be made by keeping one's company's interests protected. Big companies have WEB PR workgroups for a reason Phoon - money.
Reply #24 Top
MS wrote a defective installer that has adversely affected all AMD based computers.
End of quote


Maybe I really was just lucky, but I had no problem what so ever updating to SP3 on my AMD-laptop (Sony), which uses the Sony-OEM version of XP-Home. :NOTSURE:
Reply #25 Top
Maybe I really was just lucky, but I had no problem what so ever updating to SP3 on my AMD-laptop (Sony), which uses the Sony-OEM version of XP-Home.
End of quote


Not sure of all of the parameters but, MS has advised all users with AMD based machines to not install SP3 at this time.