Try truth more important than a "beauty"

If you wear a tag, your either a member of that guild or your lying to the people around you.

I have to say:

Ron Lugge, Psyy, you two are pathetic. Man up.

Compared to Paradoxant, whose first response was to schedule a new match, you're just miserable little worms. Your first response is to make ridiculous excuses, trying to hide how pathetic you both are. Lugge, your whole "threads of Sin" stuff is nonsensical. Nobody cares whether or not you recognize them as a clan, and nobody knows who are you outside of your tiny little community. Psyy is just a forum troll who doesn't play Sins.

It's nice how you respond to threads when you have no clue what you're talking about. It's nice how you represent your clan by dodging and behaving like terrified little children. Maybe consider a new game and forum to troll? Thanks.

LMFAO @ (and not with) HuntingX. Go check the last few pages of the game manual.

i sense a disturbance in the force :LOL:

Please, lets not bring that in. It automaticly raises the level of maturity I have to show the guy.

So, instead of firing back as I owe so richly desire too... oh, who the heck am I kidding? I just wish the forum rules allowed me to flame back! Or, better yet, that I could convey tone and emotion better through text!



I'm pathetic am I?

I, who openly declare my guild association rather than hiding it, who is more than willing to face anyone down in a 1v1, schedule permitting, am pathetic... because I dare oppose you and disagree with your... opinions?



Paradoxant is one person, I'm another. His response may have been to schedule a new match... so I don't have to. My response is to pick out the stupid little flaws that creep into others arguments, because thats what I'm good at. Simply because you can't counter my arguments is no reason to become upset with anyone except yourself.



I have no clue what your talking about, unless your reffering to the community recognized clan thread I started because someone asked me to. Having taken on that responsibility, it falls to me to fullfil it to the best of my ability.

If you don't like that ability, you can always find someone else who will take on the job, and that people would like to see doing it. (The latter being just as important as the former, so don't think you can just name your second account to do it.)



Oh goodie! Then you won't be wasting more of my time demanding recognition from me?



I'm already planning to let Zoomba know about this thread, but how about adding in LordKosc, Annatar, Sorceress, Monk, Kyro, and Yarlen to the people who know me? (In case you didn't catch that, that was another gamma tester, three forumites, a moderator and a dev... as well as the board admin at the beginning -- and don't miss Multi, who is also a gamma).



Wow, I'm sure the devs will be surprised that he didn't give them any help in the gamma test!



I'd be tempted to go with a line about "pot, kettle, black", except... that would require you to be halfway right. Alas, thats not true -- that would be a fun reply. I'll just have to settle for pointing out that my response was completely on point, after having read the entire thread. Whereas yours... "Ad hominem" ring any bells?



I represent my clan by being who I am. By being the person that made me a founding member.



Yes, please do go find another game and forum to troll, that would be very much appreciated.

Sarcasm is wasted on idiots. Let's post some items with quotes, and then analyze whether or not the statement was sarcastic. Beginning.... now!

Quote #1:
"Yo are we "community recognized" yet?"

Notice the quotations around community recognized. The post was a BAIT.

Which you then took by:

Quote #2 (you):
Again, old thread with no action, no attempts to recruit, and neither I nor anyone I've asked has seen you online.

So, neither you, nor your clanmates in GE, WHERE YOU WERE A FOUNDING MEMBER, have seen me online. Yes this must be true. However, this is instantly contradicted by the following statement:

Quote #3 (me):
Besides the fact that we spanked you guys in a clan match and posted the replay?

OOPS.

https://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/300017

Now continuing:
You fell for the bait, then got angry that you looked like a retard. That's too bad.

Clearly, my original post about being "recognized" was 100% serious and I CRAVE your recognition. But the fact that you couldn't understand the obvious sarcasm is indicative of your limited intelligence. I'm not ignoring your points, they're just all uniformly stupid. In fact, nobody in my clan wears a tag but me (and I RARELY do). Nobody. Using tags as any sort of "definitive" evidence is just garbage. I have many posted clan replays, and you will very infrequently eZ anything. We use the names we've always used, and some of my players are too lazy to create new ones. This just means we don't need the strange psychological comfort you find in tags, but this doesn't affect our ability as a clan, as your own chief pointed out. Basically, the ONLY thing you can fall back on is the "lack of tags," both you and psyy, and both of you are idiots

Further, just because psyy was in the "gamma test" doesn't mean squat to me. The game came out incredibly poorly balanced. He's done a great job. The Devs created a great basis for the game, and then had a bunch of idiots (or a tiny community of bad gamers) playtest the thing. And it failed. If you read his other posts, he clearly has no clue what he's talking about. Just because he participated in some test to get the game going, doesn't mean he has any idea about the game itself. So that he should butt into MY business, which doesn't concern him at all, is laughable.

Finally, MR. FOUNDING MEMBER. I expect you to be at the clan match on Wednesday. Because, as you said, GE is the definitive super awesome clan of Sins, and as the super awesome FOUNDING MEMBER of GE, you should be there. I'm sure since you're a FOUNDING MEMBER, Para will let you play. Am I right? Obviously, if for whatever reason you don't show up, at a time that Para said explicitly he would bring his 3 best, I can deduce the following:

1. You're bad at Sins and should not post
2. You're bad at life and are dodging a computer game to save your ego
3. You're awesome at life and everything HuntingX says is wrong

Wait does 3 follow?

As far as I'm concerned, if it's not an official match, we don't necessarily take it seriously. We like to try new strats and get some of our newer members some clan v clan experience for non-official matches. So after this next game, we will either hands down lose or hands down win. The scoreboard doesn't lie, and you were very good players in that match and you deserved the win. If you want bragging rights... then please, play us officially and win. We will have nothing to say in that case.

You guys need to communicate better...

We already set the match for this Wednesday at 7:30 Eastern. It was announced in the forums as well, I'd assumed that Para told you guys about it. I hope to see you there.

You can't even read can you? I'm not using tags as definitive evidence, my statement, in its entirety, was that not using them makes you less visible, which is less recognizable.

Yeah, the balance could have been better. But did you notice that the thing is incredibly stable, on most systems?



Or... 4. I'm at class at 4:30 PST.

That, and bringing our 3 best -- or 5 best -- doesn't put me in the game. I'm a good player; Eets, Lament, Haeso, Third are all great players.

Anytime you want a game with me, schedule permitting, feel free to ask. Maybe I'll win, maybe I won't.

But what I won't do is insult you for no reason but you managed to tick me off.

Edit:



Actually, its on the boards -- third was probably busy with the SF match thats been going on for a while, and his recent promotion of course.

Alright guys, play nice.  If you can't keep this thread civil, I'll be forced to close this thread.

Personal attacks are NOT ok.

OK now that that tiff is over (and if I had mod rights it would have never happened). Lets get back to business. I appear to have the ability to edit this thread again so there is a matter at hand to deal with. I still do not have a general consensus on the last two eZ games. So until I have a clear community opinion I will not add them to the list.

Result of our last game, which was "official"

The game minidumped and autosave and autoreplay didn't save ANYTHING for anybody. This has never happened to us before.

SO, here's where we were standing at the time of the minidump
HuntingX had 10 phase and had a maxed fleet up to the 5th fleet. TEN PHASE GATES. He was maxed with enforcers, sentinels, and carriers. Obviously, he was number 1 in fleet.
astax had 15 kodiaks and some lrms and whatnot
I had a small army at the time as it just got killed (something like 20 lrms and some light frigates). I lost a Kol but had rebuilt it and was sending it back out.

The GE players in TOTAL had
~50 LRMs
~30 Flak frigates
~10 carriers
~10 scouts
They also lost 2/3 of their cap ships (all akkans)

After the game, they said that their "winning" strategy was to fly their scouts into Hunting's planets and bomb all his research facilities and phase gates. Keep in mind that scouts have something like a five minute cooldown to bomb anything and that Hunting could easily... omg... wait for it... rebuild the labs! Plus the gates don't stop when the labs are gone.

They think they won. They think their small fleet and scouts would be enough to not only stop Hunting's RA fleet, but kill his labs and gates as well. Furthermore, they now refuse to play us a rematch because we were apparently too aggressive in asking for a rematch right away.

You can decide who would have won.

Oh, by the way, YES HuntingX is an asshole. He even admits it and seems to be proud of it. Does that matter when considering the result of the game? Of course not. The fact that none of us ended up with auto replays or saves is also very strange. Considering we were winning, I find it a little suspicious but I'm not making any accusations.

I didn't play the game, I have no info on it... yet let me point something out: scouts cost a mere fraction of a phase gate or lab, and can be built in mere seconds.

The problem with that argument is that when a vasari player gets RA and has multiple phase gates, money isn't an issue any longer. All he'd spend money on at that point is research and getting fleet size upgrade. For him to have to rebuild 1 or 2 labs isn't a big deal.

Keep in mind that 10 scouts costs 2000 credits and has a fleet cost as well. That means building scouts DOES present an opportunity cost to the one who builds them as they could have used their resources on getting more offensive ships. Not to mention that the 10 scouts are completely useless after they bomb one target as they have a cooldown of something like 5 minutes. In short, they're not a threat and honestly a waste of resources. They only really scare players that are afraid of losing any structures.

Sadly, I will not "call" a game at this point nor do I think I will in the future due to my involvement with the GE for conflict of interest reasons and to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. If a game crashed then reschedule it and chalk up the time spent to experience opportunity and intel gathering.

edit: whoops rong thed lol

We Are Nice Guys [WANG] have beted MAGOG clans and Aura of Honour (AOH) in 3 game (2 MAGOG and 1 AoH)! You can find victory celebrations and replays in this challenge thread https://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/306912/page/1 where we detail how MAGOG and AoH were touched by WANG. MAGOG tean did not show up for the first battel which means we beted them two times. The games went happen on april of 5 and 6. This means that WANG is undefeated by all Sins of a Solar Emperor clans and is the nicest and best guys in Sins of a Solar Emperor!

Do I see what looks like a "Ponyish" clan logo here?

@Spacecortez - confirmation by someone from AoH would be real nice.

https://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/304183/page/2

Yeah the AoH guy says it also the replays show EVERYTHING.

OK. Let me see if I can make this painfully clear...

1. I should not/will not check other threads and watch replays to check a report.
2. When making a report you should list the "challenger", "victor" & "date".
3. A member, preferable a leader from each clan should post IN THIS THREAD the results as reported are accurate.
4. Report the full name and tag for the clans. Note: if the name is ridiculously long I reserve the right to shorten it since the forum layout does not leave a lot room horizontally.

Now back to our regularly scheduled program....


Record updated.

Not to be picky or anuything but I think they'd prefer to be MAGOG rather than AGOG, unless MAGOG is too long. Also the challenger and defender for our matches is a bit ambiguououous since we posted a thread challenging everyone and they replied accepting our challenges even though we never addressed their clanz0rs by name.

Well details like that need to be worked out between the clan leaders prior to the scheduled game. There should some order to such things and "official" clan games should be well planned and not a casual pickup game type of endeavor.

Moreover I hate to say it but i want to be perfectly clear, if the clan leaders are not interested enough in getting organized and then posting results here then I'm not interested enough to update the record.

Anyway, I'll update the name.

Delete me - damn double post.