Hate

Is It Really A Crime

Hate
Is It Really a Crime

In the past couple of years “Hate Crimes” have been becoming more and more in the fore front of the news. We continue to hear about the different things that happen to someone based on their color, sexuality, ethnicity, cultural background, etc. Television programs such as the “Law and Order” series use the term “Hate Crimes” at least once in every program. We hear the term used to a great extent in local and national news broadcast. But, what does the government (USA) base its laws on? The following information was taken from the FBI’s web site on the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR).

2006 Hate Crime Statistics http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2006/index.html

“Incidents and Offenses: The UCR Program collects data about both single-bias and multiple-bias hate crimes. For each offense type reported, law enforcement must indicate at least one bias motivation. A single-bias incident is defined as an incident in which one or more offense types are motivated by the same bias. A multiple-bias incident is defined as an incident in which more than one offense type occurs and at least two offense types are motivated by different biases.”

“Offenders: Reporting agencies identified 7,330 known offenders in 7,722 bias-motivated incidents in 2006. In the Uniform Crime Reporting Program, the term known offender does not imply that the suspect’s identity is known. The term indicates that some aspect of the suspect was identified, thus distinguishing the suspect from an unknown offender. Law enforcement agencies specify the number of offenders and, when possible, the race of the offender or offenders as a group.”

“Victims: In the Uniform Crime Reporting Program, the victim of a hate crime may be an individual, a business, an institution, or society as a whole. Nationwide in 2006, law enforcement agencies reported that there were 9,652 victims of hate crimes. Of these victims, ten were victimized in two separate multiple-bias incidents.

Location Type: Reporting agencies may specify the location of an offense within a hate crime incident as one of 25 location designations. Information regarding the location of the 7,722 hate crime incidents reported in 2006 indicated that:”

31.0 percent happened in or near residences or homes.
18.0 percent took place on highways, roads, alleys, or streets.
12.2 percent occurred in colleges or schools.
6.1 percent occurred in parking lots or garages.
3.9 percent happened in churches, synagogues, or temples.
2.5 percent took place in commercial office buildings.
2.1 percent occurred in bars or nightclubs.
11.0 percent occurred in other or unknown locations.
13.2 percent of the incidents occurred in the remaining specified location categories (e.g., public building, air/bus/train terminal, convenience store) or in multiple locations

The question here is what do you the average Joe think of when you hear the words “Hate Crime?”

Can we really in act legislation on how someone feels toward a specific race of people, someone’s ethnicity, or sexuality, etc?

Are we going in the wrong direction with hate legislation; is there another direction that would be better then filling up our jails with offenders of “Hate Crimes.?

Hate crimes are being placed ahead of other crimes. One example is if you go out and throw a brick through the window of a store, and cause other damage to this store; should you be brought up on vandalizing and destruction of private property or a hate crime incident. First, let look at race, you are a Black and the store owner is Koran. Second, let look at the neighborhood, it considered primary Black. Third, as there been a problem in the past with Black on Koran crime, or the other way around? And, finally what is the greater offense, Hate or Vandalizing?

The greater question is was the vandalizing done because of hate or just someone being mean? How do you determine what crime was committed? Now I understand hate crime when dealing with specific groups (skinheads, etc.). For example: What I am really looking for is how do they determine if a rape was a hate crime, or just some idoit out to a muse himself/herself?

After reading through the tons of information on this topic it is still unclear to me as to the determining factor in what makes a hate crime. If you want to learn more about this subject go to “Google” and type in “Hate Crimes.”

Here is one last thought; is the term “Hate Crime” becoming the new term for “Terrorism.?”

Lee
3,507 views 4 replies
Reply #1 Top
Hate becomes a crime when one person or group puts their thoughts and/or words into action(s) of hurt against another person or thing. Hate is a word that gets thrown around alot and is misused often by most people. It's become ok to say "I hate you" or "I hate that guy" or "I hate that food/color/movie/tv show" etc., etc. It's used in that type of context to display a very strong dislike for or of someone or something. So IMO, what I said in the beginning!
Reply #2 Top
Here is one last thought; is the term �Hate Crime� becoming the new term for �Terrorism.?�



Interesting point! I've not noticed it, but it could very well be if the authorities wants to downplay something that we (the public) shouldn't get all hot and bothered over - who knows!
Reply #3 Top
Can we really in act legislation on how someone feels toward a specific race of people, someone’s ethnicity, or sexuality, etc?
End of quote


No. But we can and do create legislation that controls what actions can be performed, by designating such actions as 'hate crimes'. If I as a white man beat up a black man in the street it's an offence that would at one time have been categorized as assault. Now it's a 'hate crime'. Take the recent case of the so-called 'Jena Six' as an example.

They assaulted a white youth - but their actions were designated as some type of resistance to the 'hate crime' involved in the original cause celebre - which had something to do with blacks not being allowed to sit under a specific tree. Or something like that. I paid very little attention to the original cause of the beating because I was far more interested in the outcome - which was that six thugs were feted as heroic warriors of the struggle against racism, despite the fact that they were nothing of the sort, being nothing more than petty criminals.

Now imagine that six whites do exactly the same thing to a black youth. Instantly, and beyond doubt, we have a 'hate crime'. 'Hate crime' was born out of Liberal White Guilt, and is nothing but a linguistic marker for a shift in cultural preferences. White assaults on blacks were once considered to be no more than an informal means of disciplining the Uppity Nigger, without the time and cost of involving Courts and Law Enforcement. Now Black assaults on Whites are considered to be a means of promoting the 'struggle for Black Consciousness' and a means to punish Evil Whitey: who after all did as much and far worse to the anscestors of the 'Jena Six'.

Liberal White Guilt being the pernicious nonsense that it is, lip service is paid to the universal principle that 'hate crime' is supposed to embody - no one is allowed to say or do anything hateful to anybody, ever - but when was the last time you saw or heard such grossly brazen exploitation of an assault by Blacks on Koreans? Or Koreans on Blacks? Or an assault by any other racial group on any other racial group?

No. 'Hate crime' is reserved as a designation that primarily describes Black/White relations - though the occasional Whining Jew will also make use of it to dignify his or her personal set of resentments, fears, and grudges.

It's not an attempt to legislate how anyone should think or feel on the topic of race. It's an attempt to appease the past by distorting the present.
Reply #4 Top
EmperorfIceCream. . .some very good point. This is the type of respond I was looking for when I put this together.

What is sad about Hate is that we have to find a way to legislate against it; we as people are suppose to know better then to hate. However, can legislation really make us not hate someone because of race, sex, sexuality, etc? Not really. You just cannot legislate against human feelings.

Lee