JohnHusky JohnHusky

New war soon to come?

▼

New war soon to come?

Iran & Israel with US help

from Sins Forums
Just been reading a danish artikel about some tension between Iran & Israel
So are wo gonna see a new war soon?

It seems like Iran is making atomic weapons...
The US is trying to make Iran stop the production of this kinds of weapons diplomatically. But if it failes. The US havent denied an military action can happen.

This is going to very bad, if they got the nukes ready.

I think its only a matter of time before we see another war, the US is dragging its ppl into

What do you think is going to happen?

off-topic
125,032 views 62 replies
Reply #51 from Sins Forums Top
only if you want to claim that you're an idiot.
in which case I win.


Not necesarily, what is that makes you win?
Reply #52 from Sins Forums Top
the fact that you cannot support your arguement.
Sins of a Solar Empire: Rebellion
Reply #53 from Sins Forums Top
the fact that you cannot support your arguement.


But, I did.

Just in a different way.
Reply #54 from Sins Forums Top
you worked outside the parameters of the established debate...
thats not "in a different way". thats "for a different topic".
Reply #55 from Sins Forums Top
you worked outside the parameters of the established debate...
thats not "in a different way". thats "for a different topic".


No, it was still the same topic, just with a different view and definition.

You never specified what definition you meant, so by defacto rules of debate I could have used any definition I wanted.

Look it up
Reply #56 from Sins Forums Top
it would be if your definition was not so grossely different.
you defined hierarchy as a bunch of people in a line all begging to one man, thats a completely different topic from a bunch of equally begging at each other men in a bunch of parralel and convergant lines.
You never specified what definition you meant, so by defacto rules of debate I could have used any definition I wanted.

not if the usage is perfectly clear. if I was vague in which definition I meant (which, note I wasn't) then this defacto rule would hold.
Reply #57 from Sins Forums Top
not if the usage is perfectly clear. if I was vague in which definition I meant (which, note I wasn't) then this defacto rule would hold.


But, you never specified.
In a formal arguement, everything has to be specified.
Reply #58 from Sins Forums Top
well note: this is a forum, not a formal arguement.
and for once, dont cling to your ship if I've already sunk it.
Reply #59 from Sins Forums Top
well note: this is a forum, not a formal arguement.
and for once, dont cling to your ship if I've already sunk it.


I have already let the arguement die, I just wasnt going to be the first to admit it.

Reply #60 from Sins Forums Top
its not dead, I just won.
Reply #61 from Sins Forums Top
its not dead, I just won.


Very well, you can argue with yourself now
Reply #62 from Sins Forums Top
The fact that you didnt specify made the arguement open to my devious ways


only if you want to claim that you're an idiot.
in which case I win.




lol