Schod Schod

MARKET MANIPULATION???

MARKET MANIPULATION???

manipulating the commodities market

wow, my market-analyzing number-crunching economy-adoring capitalist self just got a pseudo-sexual rush.
will there be an actual market facet to this game? as in can you manipulate a market thru supply/demand??? cause if you can (and if you can create monopoly, very important) well... this would be the dream for 1/2 of myself, the other half demands great strategy.
64,870 views 53 replies
Reply #26 Top
I've realized, that if a post is more than 4 sentences long, I don't have the desire to read it...



Sucks to be you.

Anywho, As I have asked before, please post where you(schem) are getting this info. You see very definate about most of what is going on, my "genius" posts or what not are only made when I have info. All the posts I have been putting up that you have taken apart are guesstimated so they are easily very flawed. Like always, the beta will set some things straight.

So plz, cite your info, I would like to read what you have read, on this game. at that point, I will post ideas based more on fact then ideas based on what others have said and what little info I have gotten from the site itself.

SchematicsninjaFebruary 21, 2007 23:27:52Reply #25when I'm in a post, there are no "battles". there are asswhoopings and ego bruises, never afflicted


You have a somewhat grand oppinion of yourself, make sure it isn't just a sturdy house of cards.
Reply #27 Top
please post where you(schem) are getting this info

many things from old boards.
I'm one of maybe 3 oldboardies left. and I can't get you any links, so dont ask for them.

apparently (grr) some of my data is outdated, which is no surprise. but its the best we have to run on.
I would like to read what you have read

too late
make sure it isn't just a sturdy house of cards

its as sturdy as a solid stone house built on a fault line
My logic is perfectly stable, so long as the base assumptions don't change(which, dammit, one has)

which makesme bring up the point. there are three resources, credits crystal and metal, apparently now, ALL races use ALL three. this hardly hurts Market manipulation, but instead of dramatically affecting 1/3 people, you will only be applying pressure to everyone. it won't exactly detract from Market strategy, but it will significantly change it.
Reply #28 Top
solid stone house built on a fault line


As far as I know, most stone things dont really stand up to an earthquake

I think those three are the common ones, and that the other resources are more for research and the flag ships and such, you know the 'important' materials.
Reply #29 Top
and that the other resources are more for research and the flag ships and such

I haven't heard anything about other materials. but after stardock injected all sorts of changes, who knows.
As far as I know, most stone things dont really stand up to an earthquake

nothing usually stands up in earthquakes

the analogy is that my logic works fine as long as the ground it stands on remains the same.
Reply #30 Top
But if its on a fault line then it doesnt remain the same for very long

Anyway, enough analogies.

What I was talking about where the primary and secondary resources. Or was that completly removed.

And anyways we might be looking at this all wrong. Maybe this isnt about resources. Who says that you cant culture bomb a planet with your goods. "Commodities" could be anything. Vasari crystal jewelry, TECs help save humanity bomds, Advent brain washing devices ect.
Reply #31 Top
But if its on a fault line then it doesnt remain the same for very long

well duh, that was the point.
and, no, not enough analogies!
What I was talking about where the primary and secondary resources. Or was that completly removed

gone, away, banished, over the rainbow.
Who says that you cant culture bomb a planet with your goods. "Commodities" could be anything

this is too complex to put into any game really.
I can see trade ships perhaps, but I dont see yourself saying "build 200 brainwash helmets and sell to TEC"
Reply #32 Top
The bounty sounds nice.

Seems like its time for me to assume the position of Economic Czar, wouldnt you say
Reply #33 Top
Indeed
Reply #34 Top
Thank you Lharrs
Reply #35 Top
gone, away, banished, over the rainbow.


I think I missed that announcement. Where do they discuss the new system?
Reply #36 Top
What I was talking about where the primary and secondary resources. Or was that completly removed

gone, away, banished, over the rainbow.


That has not been confirmed. The only thing Yarlen has said, was that all races uses metal and crystals. Not that it was the only resources.

And in the "A Guided Tour of the Sins Beta!" it was said

constructor frigate which allows players to mine asteroids for metal and crystals (the two non-money based resources needed to build things)


So nothing has been confirmed, about removing some of the others
Reply #37 Top
Aw... I didnt high-jack this thread

Ahh well,
See my theory is that we will have three basic resources(money, crystals, and metal) And each race will need more of one based on who they are. Advent ships will cost more crystals, Vasari ships will cost more metal, and TEC ships will cost more money.

Reply #39 Top
Eloquently spoken Multianna, you get to torture the next batch of Schem Clones

Now, about your links, they are disfuctional, so you will be punished.. just kidding.
Reply #40 Top
I dont click multianna links, they're booby trapped.
Reply #41 Top
And thats why I am disappointed these arent , they just say invalid address.
Reply #42 Top
see, thats why you will never get my valid DNA.
Reply #43 Top
The fact that you somehow conected those too just makes me earn for another good Schem clone to torture jk jk.
Reply #44 Top
my DNA is quite expensive, but I never let it slip without some... detering adjustments.
nothing is as good as the original (yours are a particularly bad batch)
Reply #45 Top
Still fun to torture
Plus, they agree with me and have started a socialistic colony, its quite interesting really.
I would say that these 'adjustments' served me well
Reply #46 Top
yeah, thats what happens when I lower their IQ by 200something points... people find the "low IQ" versions more agreeable (yours is probably around 120 IQ points)
Reply #47 Top
If I lowered your IQ by 200 points youd be in the negatives

120 IQ is actually in the high end of the 'average' precentile schem. Your a genious at about 180.

Now heres a lesson in IQ.

Even though it has Intelligence in its name, it does not necessarily define it. It mostly defines three things low congnative capacity, memorization skills, and knowledge priorly gained. It doesnt describe the persons Intellectual capacity, nor does it define its potential. I once knew a person with an IQ of 160 who was one of the worst students I have ever seen, its all about work ethic.
Reply #48 Top
Your a genious at about 180.

genius is classified as 130. ubergeniuses (einstein, newton) are the very highest at 180, very few people are beyond that.
If I lowered your IQ by 200 points youd be in the negatives

correct. because I already lowered my IQ by 200 before giving them to you, I'm sorry that I'm not above 400 IQ.
I once knew a person with an IQ of 160 who was one of the worst students I have ever seen, its all about work ethic.

I know. I would sooner higher the dedicated dumbass than the apathetic genius
Reply #49 Top
I would sooner higher the dedicated dumbass than the apathetic genius

Truer words have never been spoken
By the way its hire

correct. because I already lowered my IQ by 200 before giving them to you, I'm sorry that I'm not above 400 IQ.


By yours, I meant yours, not theirs. Should I give you a lesson in grammar next?

Reply #50 Top
By the way its hire

and "its" late.
By yours, I meant yours, not theirs.

"you" dont have access to the original and pure sample
sorry to dissapoint you, you only have the corrupted species.

and when you use clones grammar goes out the window.