I tried to help only because your just going to change your name again and come back as everybody's best buddy...agaaaaaaaaain. Oh and then you'll go postal ...agaaaaaaaaaain. This way if you kept the name I would know to avoid you.   

Did you even read my comment?

Again, chances are you are just DOING IT WRONG ...or have been cleverly unlucky enough to get the 'under construction' message [whatever] each time you have tried.  Neither means it is a conspiracy.

Get a grip.

One of MY fave sites...on which I am a member now tells me I have an 'invalid IP' [or something] and denies my access.

I don't call it a conspiracy...I call it typical technical cock-up...and speak with the site owner direct....he hotlinks me to the files I'm after anyway.

Why?

Probably because I'm not an ass who blames the world [or an individual] for the 'shit' in the phrase 'shit happens'.

Joe User is not into censoring free opinion, nor is any other site hosted/owned/managed by Stardock.

Usually....when I find I can't do things that others can.....I blame my OWN incompetence, not the others their good fortune/opportunity.

Try waiting awhile....and log in again and see if it works.   Perhaps it's a cookie thing.....or a firewall/AV access issue.

I really do not find the inability [temporary or not] to create a Blog on JoeUser to be that much of an earth-shattering issue in which to tangle one's knickers....

True, but Jafo is very into editing dirty words out of postings...and I'm shocked as shit to see him use the word shit so many shitting times here!

It's context versus gratuitous usage.

Mine was the former...yours is the latter....

Don't forget....'free opinion' is not quite the same as 'free vocabulary'...

So, Mr Zubaz...What exactly should I do? I've complained several times via "reply" posts to someone elses blogs...no answer. I've sent e-mail to Stardock...no answer. I've witnessed several other people getting blogs here when I couldn't. So, Mr. Genius, what would be YOUR course of action?

Your problem (creating a blog) is real. Your tone was a rant. If I were Stardock, i'd tell you to create a blog somewhere else and stick it where the sun don't shine.

What I would do . . especially if I had issues with the company that hosted the site . . .go to blogger; two minutes and you'd be set.

I've taken the issue even further by having a friend from a different part of the country try and start a blog. That didn't work either. So, what is happening here?

BTW, this line moves you into the world of true craziness in my opinion. Brad and Stardock know your friends and are blocking them too? IT's time to up the meds.

regarding the 1st pic in #28 what did you click that took you there?

regarding your login - was it one created by you or did you use your WC/SD login in?

that would either be 4 or a total of 11 words depending on how you look at it.

and FYI: the "Readers Digest Large Type" is quite unnecessary.

I've been noticing odd referals from the galciv community. It is possible that the blogs he points out are being created outside the usual JU means. Didn't someone say that if you sign up for a personal page at WinCusto you are automagically created a JU Blog?

If you look at the moron's screenshot, you'll see that there have only been 9, count 'em, 9 blogs created at JU in the month of June. For a site that gets this kind of traffic, do you think that is normal? Either the scary, mindreading conspiracy filters on new blogs are working overtime, or there really are problems here and there.

Someone just let their paranoia show for a bit. It is admirable that he has the self-confidence to stand in public and declare the fact that his ass is pimply and fat, though. Kudos to the conspiracy nut with the healthy self-image.

Didn't someone say that if you sign up for a personal page at WinCusto you are automagically created a JU Blog?

That's how I got mine.  Signed into JoeUser using WC login/pw and voila - My Blog Page.

If you look at the moron's screenshot, you'll see that there have only been 9, count 'em, 9 blogs created at JU in the month of June. For a site that gets this kind of traffic, do you think that is normal?

Ok, I admit it! I am the guilty party! I have been reading the minds of all those applicants and denying them! Yes me! Emperor of the world! I can wipe them off the map with a single mouse click! Yes, I am that nasty neocon!

Now that you have found me out, come and get me!

(Great analysis Baker! Thanks! I just felt like being a turd. )

lol I for one love these threads

It brings out the funny in everyone.

It brings out the funny in everyone.

I resemble that remark!

No argument here.

What do ya mean, funny ?

Let me understand this cause, I don’t know maybe it’s me, I’m a little f****d up maybe, but I’m funny how? I mean, funny like I’m a clown, I amuse you ? I make you laugh…

I’m here to f****n’ amuse you ? What do you mean funny, funny how?

How am I funny ?

Baker,

LOL You've just quoted from one of my favourite scenes in one of my favourite movies.

>> JOY! <<
Haven't seen a thread like this in AGES... Ku...

>> Carry On <<

Didn't someone say that if you sign up for a personal page at WinCusto you are automagically created a JU Blog?

For someone who is very concerned about getting a blog, he doesn't read comments very well.

I have said this, and then he goes on, then I ask if he read the comment, and then no response. Hopefully he got one set up. Although I would prefer it if he said something once he does, so we can stop and move on.

>> JOY! << Haven't seen a thread like this in AGES... Ku... >> Carry On <<

So what're you saying here....we need a weekly bitch fest for amusement, entertainment?

Yeah, me too...gotta have something doing since giving up all the vices that could get me into trouble.

geez, I can't believe people are still responding to this whiny assed drivel

oops

Hey, that's great! You all are clearly fair minded individuals here! I give you pictures and you call me a "moron". Cool. I complain and you think I should wear a tin foil hat and up my (med's?). I'm guessing someone or, two is/are familiar with this concept. So, thanks for the advice. I'll by some more Advil.

Of course there is the "I must be doing something wrong". Oh, and then there is the "Change your name again and be every body's friend" statement. Well, NightTrain, I have been just as critical as I have been giving. I have also clearly said that my former online name was coreyjames66. I changed it because I was censored. I was embarrassed. I was a big pussy and, I should have pissed and moaned all over the web like so many others. Frankly, I typically give your work the lower end of my ratings. With the possible exception of, when your work is compared to others that are clearly flawed.

Jafo, you disappoint me. But what else is new. Zubaz, I don't know what to say to you...other than, I saw the picture. I know you love her. So, I know you have a heart. Still, I don't understand you on this subject. If it were your daughter getting treated like I am being treated now, you would likely be knocking down doors. But, obviously, I can find myself a "tad" contrary to popular opinion. Looking back, I should have never related your story to my family. You wouldn't do the same for me.

You all claim to "want to see proof". I give you it. You call me a "moron". You insult me. Not one of you stood up and said...."how did he get those pictures"? Not one of you even insinuated that I may have any point what-so-ever. No.

So, since I'm such a moron...besides posting a screenshot of an e-mail I sent nearly a month ago...in spite of any evidence to the contrary (which no one has offered), I'm going to go out of my way to disrespect this site and, any site related to it.

Good old Frogboy is mysteriously absent in this whole discussion. But I'm the one under scrutiny for not answering (meowythepurball?)(And I need medicine?) quick enough?

If you all don't want to see what is clearly represented in your monitors, that is your problem. I haven't seen any evidence to the contrary. No pic's showing how you did what I did. (My being such a moron).

I will give JoeUser credit. You clearly show both sides of the isle. (Sarcasm in the truest sense) Democrat's are equally as dominate as Republicans. You also show how you are above the "opposition".

So, one final picture. Not that your eyes will see it for what it is.




I'm pretty sure I gave ample notice that I was unhappy with this situation. Of course I received absolutely no response.

It reminds me of a story I once heard.

-An aroused naked man gets caught, pants down, in his own house with another woman in their bed. She asks him "What the Hell are you doing?"

He say's "nothing!"

She points out that he is naked, aroused and, in his and, his wife's bedroom with a naked woman.

He answers, "What are you gonna believe? Me? Or, your lyin' eyes?"

I know, it's just so much easier when people disappear. Well, I'm not gonna. Not now, not ever. So get used to it.

PC (P.S. NOT YOUR FRIEND (Happy NT?)

"I know, it's just so much easier when people disappear. Well, I'm not gonna. Not now, not ever. So get used to it."

Which basically proves how pathetic you are, in my opinion. IF this was true, and the site actively through some sort of brain scan weeded out Liberals from signing up... why would you hang out here? Why would you want to be on a site that refused to answer your emails because of your political stance?

Either you don't believe your own paranoia, and you are hanging out hoping to be proved wrong, or you really do believe it and you are basically insane for wanting to be in an evil place full of people who don't like you and who are just going to keep abusing you every time you post. Come on, if you really believe this stuff, this is the last place in the world you'd want to be.

You won't catch me over at DU because they delete any conservative post as a matter of policy. Read their terms of use. You can see Liberal bloggers posting on JU, and yet somehow we have the brainscan technology in place to prevent them from signing up. Somehow I've seen them abuse Brad over and over for weeks before he finally banned their sorry asses.

Like other paranoid conspiracy theorists, you believe we have to disprove what you haven't proven. I don't have to disprove the existence of alien anal probes until someone has offered something to prove that there's any reason to believe they occur in the first place.

When you can tell me how any website administrator can determine a person's politics before they even sign up, THEN maybe we'll talk about me going off and getting screenshots and crap. In the meantime, I'm not interested in wasting my time showing you pictures that DON'T have bigfoot in them.

In the meantime, I'm not interested in wasting my time showing you pictures that DON'T have bigfoot in them.

Hey, Baker, I'm not aligned or influenced by any political persuasion, nor do I subscribe to conspiracy theories, so can I see 'em....pretty please. Oh, and those you have WITH bigfoot in them....

and oh, what about those pics, audio/video tapes suggesting government cover-ups regarding UFO's, alien visitors and time travel....those proving a secret terrorist plot coming from within the kindergarten fraternity to overthrow the democratic free world.

Damn governments....think we can't handle the truth, and now we've got the private sector dictating what we can and cannot say....what we can and cannot hear. It's true, they're all out to get us, suppress free thought and treat us like mushrooms by keeping us in the dark and feeding us bullshit.

No, no. I only collect the pictures that prove Bigfoot doesn't exist.

You know, the ones you take on vacation that don't have Bigfoot in them, or the portraits you have where Bigfoot isn't doing little finger-antennae over your head, etc. I even hear that there are anti-Bigfoot websites on the Internet where you can pay to look at people doing dirty things with each other that also don't have Bigfoot in them, and therefore prove the non-existance of Bigfoot.

Come to think about it, ALL of the stuff I have would be proof of the non-existence of Brad's Liberal Detection Device, since I don't have any pictures that feature it. After all, a screenshot of an error page is proof of a Republican conspiracy.

If anyone can think of better proof that JU isn't able to covertly determine people's political stance, please feel free to let us know where to look. I'd hate for the mountains of evidence posted by Mr PC to go unanswered...