Design software weakens classic drawing skills

As both a fine artist and digital one I thought this recent article was very interesting, thought everyone here might find so as well.

(Reuters)
It's not a pretty picture.

U.S. art students spend so much time toying with computer graphics these days that many wind up without needed drawing skills, university instructors say.

Students are more comfortable manipulating computer graphics than doodling, drafting and drawing with pen on paper, and this has created a sharp decline in drawing skills in recent years, teachers say.

Additionally, tech-savvy students simply lack the initiative and persistence developed by drawing, resulting in uninspired work -- at least work on paper.

"I see an increasing passivity on the part of students," says Marc Treib, a University of California, Berkeley architecture professor who hosted a recent conference on the state of drawing in an electronic age.

Computer graphics allow artists to move briskly. By contrast, drawing on paper can be frustrating, forcing concentration, introspection and revision as an idea or vision takes shape. The process hones essential skills and sensitivity and personality that make artwork unique, instructors say.

"It doesn't happen right way," according Chip Sullivan, a professor of landscape architecture at the University of California, Berkeley and conference speaker. "Drawing to me is a sense of consciousness ... a spiritual existence."

Aspiring artists no longer need to spend hours with pen and paper. Now they may produce polished drawings quickly on-screen with software such as Adobe Creative Suite 2 by Adobe Systems Inc., which allows users to incorporate photographs, graphs, text and images for special effects to create electronic files for print, Web or mobile use.

TRADITIONAL DRAWING SELLS WELL

While art instructors may lament drawing skills of today's students, they are not dissuading students from developing digital skills. The trick is to improve drawing to develop a solid foundation for digital skills, says Charles Pyle, director of the School of Illustration at the Academy of Art University.

"If you don't draw and think well, your art career will be short and unpleasant," Pyle says. "The basics serve the digital end and give the kids a vastly superior portfolio when they leave here."

John Woodbridge, director of the San Francisco-based university's School of Computer Arts-New Media, says traditional art skills are important but students aspiring to become commercial artists must be conversant with software because employers say they want artists and "production people" capable of working with an increasing number of programs.

"You need to know coding issues, scripting, interactive design," he says. "It's a blurring of lines between design and production ... We're all wearing more hats these days."

Still, traditional drawing by itself can pay off. While students are shelving sketchbooks for laptops loaded with graphics software, collectors are snapping up drawings.

"There is a high demand for works on paper," says Alex Rotter, a vice president of the contemporary art department at Sotheby's in New York. "Some people prefer the sensibility of a drawing."

Price is another reason for the demand. Drawings are cheap compared with paintings and sculptures. Drawings by up-and-coming artists can be bought for about $1,000.

Drawing is easy on the pocketbooks of artists as well. Materials are inexpensive and it does not require much studio space, reasons an increasing number of artists are concentrating on creating works on paper.

"It's affordable," says Los Angeles artist Russell Crotty, noting he gave up painting in 1989 in favor of drawing as his primary medium. He adds: "All my shows can be all drawings, whereas 20 years or so ago that wasn't acceptable."
4,034 views 10 replies
Reply #1 Top

Nothing new.

AutoCAD [and its equivalents] did little for Architectural creativity and imagination, too.

The only advantage of CAD is with the computation/design of free-form and/or 3D spatial structures [trusses].....from the engineer's standpoint.

CAD won't replace a designer's imagination or spatial conceptualizing of form.....[if you can't think it - don't try drawing it]...

Reply #2 Top
I agree with ya Jafo. I even noticed this happening some years ago when I was taking all my courses. There are alot of graphics people (even then) that can't draw a simple picture with a pencil worth anything. I'm not say they are not good computer graphics people (just don't ask them to sketch something out real quick for you).
Reply #3 Top
My type teacher makes us write in typefaces. I've gotten good at Bodoni, Helvetica, Franklin Gothic and Futura (The only typefaces worth using ) It's good to be able to quickly draw something out for a client, than to bring a computer around and fiddle with it. Anyone can keyboard out some type.

I prefer to do work on paper, and then use the computer to give it that 'finished' look. People don't seem to realize that computers are a tool like any other. It would be foolish for someone to work only with charcoal, and completely ignore pencil, paint, etc.
Reply #4 Top
I was a board draftsman for quite a few years before desktop CADD became the industry standard & I've been doing AutoCad daily since verion 2.5 (I've got 2 drawings up right now) I try not to hire CAD operators who do not have drafting experience or at least some training in conventional drafting. The main reason is that when you draft you need to have a fairly good CONCEPT of how your going to lay out a set of drawings BEFORE you start. Conceptualizing is the most important aspect of design in my business. Without a good concept hours/days/weeks worth of work can all mean nothing in the end.
Reply #5 Top
CAD won't replace a designer's imagination or spatial conceptualizing of form.


Not true... the software I use has an imagination all of it's own. Why else would it keep putting toilets on roofs?
Reply #6 Top
I'm ten times better with a pencil than I am with PSP/Photoshop. Kinda difficult skinning with a pencil though...
Reply #7 Top
Kinda difficult skinning with a pencil though...

Yeah-- the eraser pilings really build up under my monitor...
Reply #8 Top
I'm ten times better with a pencil than I am with PSP/Photoshop. Kinda difficult skinning with a pencil though...


Are none of the graphical tablets good enough to emulate the 'real thing'?

I'm no artist, tho' I do CAD work from time-to-time and the tablets appeal to me even if I haven't actually tried one.


Posted via WinCustomize Browser/Stardock Central
Reply #9 Top
Not true... the software I use has an imagination all of it's own. Why else would it keep putting toilets on roofs?


Thats why those of us in the field that actually are building the product from those programs just have to wonder sometimes where all these profound concepts were originated from...LoL

Dont worry guys, when we build it, the toilet gets put in a more appropriate place no matter what the prints say..LoL
Reply #10 Top
I bet you could get a lot of drawing done on the toilet. We should start putting them all over the place.