Great trailer.  I hope the game lives up to the quality I've come to expect from Stardock!

Did not like parts of the trailer

1) Liked:

a small prologue - i hope that besides random maps there will be a single campain with a good plot and cinematics

2) Did not like:

How the battle on terrain was pictured, a single marrine got out of his capsule and took two shots at something, then another marrine took two shots at two lonely enemy soldiers (seemed to be an invasion army)... well not too epic i would say. of course it is mainly the matter of money but i would picture a full scale assult on enemy possitions with air defense shotting down arriving landing parties, then a huge wave of tanks, marrines, hellicopters piricing throught enemy defense lines.

you should realy learn from blizzard how to creat such movies. these really increase the desire to play

And that was not bad but could be better:

The disign of the ships - flying squares are not bad but in my case i would like to see something more... well may be elegant. some models looked good, but some seemed to be taken from some old fiction books.

The battle at space again could be more epic - there was no resistance for invading party, no drama. it looked like we knew how would win eventualy

Stardock doesn't have the experience or the resources to do something that Blizzard can afford and has been doing for along while. Blizzard quality level videos would be more than epic though.

That is why I give such an advice.And yes the resources do matter thought more money invested in marketing of a GOOD game really turns later a profit for the brand

GC1 and GC2 are good games, and i am afraid that nothing new will be added in GC3. My decision on purchasing the game will be mainly based on some NEW interesting features available in the game also as remaining and improving old features (such as building and constructing ships). not on the quality of the movie.

Fantastic trailer. Really looking forward to this game. Just a couple of more teasers and I may buy the game in advance.

The GalCiv series never had multiplayer before. So, how does adding it not introduce something new to the game?

True, but that is a whole other discussion of whether multiplayer adds something new, or not.

There's no reason to be disappointed in a game which is yet to be released, lets wait and see what they come up with.

I'm sure I will spend some time in the future playing it  

Trailers are wasted on me. I pre-ordered without even reading a word about the game. Well, one word I read: GalCiv3. That's all I neeed to know. Call me a fanboy, I'm OK with it.

Other then that, thanks for the awesome trailer. 

SotS is a completely different kind of game.  The worst thing they could do to galciv is turn it into a completely different game.  You might as well complain that you can't pilot fighters like a space combat sim.

Very nice trailer. So much evolved since GCII trailers. ¿Same animators of the SoSE? Very similar shaders. 

I can't imagine having 8 friends who have the time or inclination to play a weekly regular game from start to finish, probably over several weeks.

I have to say I think you're wide of the mark there if you think people know more than a couple of other people who are prepared to play a multi-player game at the same time, outside of forum-arranged games. Forum arranged games are the norm in other deep strategy games, like Europa Universalis IV.

I volunteer for multiplayer testing duties

The problem is that random people on the internet are lying, cheating, exploiting, whining little children that suck in general.  It's why I hate MP games.   Forum arranged or friend arranged games are the only way to go.  Unfortunately, no one I know would ever want to play a tbs game.