Holy crap, that armor looks familiar.  I know why, it looks like it belongs in a Dynasty Warriors game!

I suspect that key thing is to pay attention to the feedback of your beta testers and people like that who have actually played the game and seen how everything works, rather then that of random people on your forums who haven't actually played the game.

They haven't really shown much.

Yeah, Blizzard isn't the company that listens to concerns. Blizzard is the company that follows its own vision, successfully.

So they're changing aspects of the game. There is only one reason for doing so: they want higher sales. If you bought several copies of D2 and you are now expressing concerns of how the D3 game will be different and it shouldn't be, and you're on forums raging about it - that's the very essence of a sense of entitlement. You think the company owes you something, but they owe you nothing.

Realize and understand that when a company like Blizzard says they're not interested in feedback regarding X, then it's time for you to move on. Not dig in deeper.

PS. In case you didn't get it, D3 is just as much a sequel to WOW as it is to D2, in terms of target audience. They want WOW players to buy it, they want D2 players to buy it - but if they have to CHOOSE, they'll take WOW players any day. So while a "fan" might have bought several D2 copies (hell, I even did that), you are but a drop in the ocean compared to the WOW customers.

Edit: Just to be clear: Blizzard in a nutshell: follow the money. Anything else would be a betrayal of their owners. This might not work for every company! But it sure as hell has worked for Blizzard.

and now you just being silly...

Of course I played Diablo 2, more hours than I can count, and what you say just proves my point, you can have a lush and "tropical" setting and still have a very dark atmosphere which D2 had in spades. it's not about the environment you use it's how it's directed and portrayed.

This new art direction just looks like a cartoon, and thats hilarious considering the age of it's predecessor. It is obvious the original Diablo team is long gone at this point. Personally I am not looking forward to Isometric WOW. If you are more power too you. I'll be off playing real games. How many years are these two games apart? I would say at this point D2 actually looks better. Laughable....

It also seems that many of you played TQ and not the immortal throne. The wonders that expansion did for that game was amazing. (oh and don't forget the mods) I don't think your really qualified to comment on the game unless you did honestly.  You didn't experience all it had to give. I'd urge you to give it a shot if you yearn a hack and slash. Again I didn't like TQ, but IT was superb.
It wasn't necessarily fixing broken content, It was just a text book expansion pack that vastly improved the on the original game, and addressed most of the faults the original version had. This is what the best expansions achieve! How about GALCIV2? You wish TOTA never happened? Please.  If we got more of this type of content for games these days instead of the trickle of un-imaginative DLC  the game industry would be in a better place. I mourn Ironlore....

Really the same argument that immortal throne's content being in TQ's original release could be said for Diablo 2 and LOD. Add to that any game that vastly improves on the original version, lets throw Super Streetfighter 4 into the mix too shall we? Lets just say no games should ever have expansions or improve on the original concept shall we? Is this really a bad thing? You would prefer just a bunch of content adding nothing to the game other than more gameplay hours? .... uhh yeah no thanks, fresh and interesting is good.

If you think that every game should come out perfect, then you are a little out of touch with how the gaming industry works, You realize how much it costs to make these things these days? Some times stuff has to get pushed out to keep the company in business and start making some money so they are able to continue to improve the game.

How about Stardock just cease all patches and updates on elemental? Instead just copy and paste expansion content  without fixing the games inherent problems? As much as the original game should have been better, The current situation is by far preferable. (even though they are a unique situation)

It's seems people are really grasping at straws for arguments in this thread now, so I will leave it at that. I see Blizzards indoctrination of the gaming populace continues unperturbed...

as you were.....

Yeah WoW is becomming the base of every damn new thing; look at D&D 4th edition; if that`s not 'MMO, the pen&paper RPG' then I dunno what is.

Well really it's just that a lot of games have been embracing the concept of clearly defined class roles, where one class is designed to absorb damage, one to deal it, etc. This is something that has been around to some extent since the beginning, they key difference is that the role of the "tank" type class whose job it is to protect the more fragile characters has expanded a lot in recent games to involve more tools to prevent the opponents from running around them to attack someone else.

Regarding D&D, 3rd edition also had lots of people complaining that it was obviously designed to appeal to computer game players. I'm sure 2nd edition would have as well if there had been online web forums back then. Computer gamers aren't the only ones who hate and fear change to their favorite brands.

I dunno about that..I mean I survived the THAC0 years..who can boast such claim?...or want to go back to it...Oh God the debates!

But yeah- the typical MMO classes seems to be the norm- I suppose it`s part lazyness from the devs, part easy-does-it: I mean just put whatever type of character, and put Tank/healer/ranged DPS/melee DPs and people will get it: no need for a paragraph or two about what type of char does what.

Yeah, no wonder I stopped playing most 'redux' games: 'New' World of Darkness, D&D 4th, shadowrun 4th edition....the only game who seems to have passed the 4th ed mark without crapping all over was Call of Cthulhu, and even then it was just diffrent art and typo correction more than a whole re-doing of the system, which is why it`s the one of the rare game where everyone can have a diffrent edtion and we`ll still be able to play a game.

And saying WoW invented it all is because they`re the biggest, most successful of it`s kind: everyone remembers the Wright Brothers, who recalls What`s-his-name in England who flew in the air 10-20 years prior to them? 'least that`s my take on the matter.

I don't mind class roles at all either. I mean skill based or class based, those design choices in itself would not deter me from a game. There are plenty of other areas in the game for them to fk up a perfectly good idea anyway.

I want to believe the Demon Hunter will be more like a European Witch hunter....but DAMN me if that doesn't sound like Warcraft fan service if I've ever heard it.