You complain about everybody turning DG criticisms into anti Frogboy rhetoric, but when I criticize the QA team (with specific reasons, not just random trolling), you immediately turn it into a Frogboy issue despite the fact that I never mention the guy here and the post has nothing to do with him.
Legitimate criticisms against specific aspects of DG are not attacks on Frogboy. I dont think that I've ever said anything negative about Frogboy himself - the closest I came was saying that he was bound to get some of the blame for DG's flaws since he is the leader and the leader gets blamed for stuff that happens under him. And thats the worst I've said about him.
DG has some problems despite being a great game overall and having a ton of potential. The largest of those problems (IMO of course) is that there are a heck of a lot of simple and obvious bugs and difficulties every time something gets released. Some of these are understandable. I wasnt complaining at all about say the GeForce 7xxx bug (despite being affected by it) because I know that getting things to work on all setups is difficult and that everybody has problems upon release with some setups. But some of these bugs shouldnt have made it past QA - the random DG thing is simple and shouldnt have made it to the live version. The Favor Bug consistently showing up shouldnt happen.
Part of my job to to write software professionally, and I know that I would be in big trouble if I let bugs of this type consistently get into public stuff.
I appreciate SD's history in GalCiv and Sins. But having those two games work out well does not make criticisms of DG assanine. Are you honestly suggesting that DG's first few months is up to the standard that Stardock expected? I highly doubt that. I'm not saying that Stardock is a crap company - that would be assanine and you could use previous games as proof to show that that would be a stupid thing to say. I'm saying that DG's QA team has not done their job very well recently in DG IMO. And that has NOTHING to do with what great games Sins and GalCivII were.
I appreciate Frogboy's posts here and have consistently praised him for his efforts in doing this. But I think that DG also has some deficiencies that need criticism. I think that you guys need to stop interpreting criticisms of specific aspects of DG as criticisms of Frogboy. I also think that you need to understand that as a loyal SD customer, this games intial quality has NOT met my expectations and it has not met the expectations of many others (although your response time and work since release has met my expectations - I understand how much you have done since release and appreciate that ).
You guys have to be able to take specific and well constructed criticisms of apsects of the game as legitimate feedback and not personal insults to you or your CEO.
I understand that you guys are probably on edge because there have been a lot of trolls recently saying stupid things and personally insulting Frogboy. Yeah, you should be cracking down on those people. But I'm not those people and I've said a lot of good things about Frogboy and your company now and in the past. You cant call out posts like what I made as an example of the problems on these forums recently IMO. You complain about people blaming mean people in DG on Frogboy. Where have I said anything like that? I'm not even blaming bugs here on Frogboy - I'm blaming them on the QA team because I think they should have been caught. Dont call me out for things that others have done.
Frankly I find your response to me highly unprofessional for the reasons listed above. I give specific and thought out criticisms of specific aspects of the game and you call me out for criticising your CEO despite that fact that I never mention him and he had nothing to do with the issue. Thats not how things are supposed to work.