*grin*

I find it amusing that he wouldn't realize these things aren't difficult to see.

Pssst...I think he left..!

You are not the center of the world.

You are not the worst offender of Stardock -  by a far stretch.

If they wanted to ban you, you would not be able to post.

Your reasoning seems very self centerd and flawed.

Also you might ask yourself, if there are fanboys of Stardock, what did Stardock to get them?!

Hint: In my case many years of good games and stellar support.

If your experiance is bad, return the game and never buy of them again.

And, since you are posting the same old stuff agian and again and again, and i am bored of you, i request an ignore function.

Thanks.

Pssst...I think they banned him for reporting that their game is broken and that they ripped him off on the refund.

I think I smell a second dummy account

I wouldn't be surprised, really.

Stardock 2, Troll 0

On one hand thread should probably be locked, but on the other hand the troll may spread to other parts of the forum if it can't post here.

What is suprising is how much "Stardock" support this thread is getting... while there is a thread that is over 1 week old (still on the first page of Technical Support Forums) with 3 pages of comments about crashing, when failed to connect to another player, and there are ZERO "Stardock" responses to that thread about any kind of fix or even acknowledgment of the problem... How about we see some care for the customers that want to stick around and get things working instead of the ones that are crying and will probably leave either way.

Just a Thought

Bart.

You should read Frogboy's journals. At least half of the things in them are explaining this and similar issues.

The Demigod Journals link should provide the official updates you like.

Thank you

I work in the video game industry as a software engineer.  From a work point of view, I totally sympathize with Stardock and their employees.  However, from a consumer point of view, they drop the ball and that's pretty much a fact.  They're nice enough to give refunds which many game companies don't but regardless of that, their product didn't quite work as described - at least in the first couple weeks.

While the OP seems to have gone a little overboard in his raging out, he still does have a point somewhat.  In his mind, the game doesn't work _at all_.  Because of that, he feels he shouldn't have to pa a dime for it.  Not for the product itself and not fo S&H. 

The example you gave isn't like this scenario at all.  A more appropriate example would be one where you buy a product that barely works immediately after purchase.  The fact that Stardock is putting in a lot of effort to fix the issue is irrelevant to the fundamental problem that the product was broken.  A product is graded on its value at release and not on future promises.

I'm not complaining about this, mind you - I know some the woes of software engineering... especially when it involves desperate bug fixes directly after release.

@Schlista...

People acting like you only serve to validate/justify the treatment gamers get from companies like EA, ActiBlizz, Atari, Ubi and others - just stop it. Grow up and man-up. If not...